Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bnegreve
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
39 ms
·
361.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
> There's definitely not enough information in the article to draw that conclusion. On the other hand, I don't see enough information to discard this hypothesis. I'm tempted to believe the author of course, but I don'
362.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
> unconscious bias which is not good for anyone. A bias has to be in favour of some people. Those people are usually the ones who include their photos.
363.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
You can check perf tool. E.g. $> perf stat echo "hi" Performance counter stats for 'echo hi': 0.718209 task-clock (msec) # 0.595 CPUs utilized 2
364.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
> I do commercial closed-source development; there is no public branch to the whole world. OTOH, all feature branches are public to the team If you don't work with private branches, it's not surprising that you don't see a
365.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
It was probably translated from Greek, why is it a problem?
366.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
I think your comment is a bit unfair. All the problems you mentioned also exist outside of the FOSS world. People feel the same frustration, but they typically won't say it because of some kind of hierarchy. Is that a good thing? I
367.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
Probably, but is it that obvious? Having an opponent that is not even trying to win is much harder to predict. I've heard several poker players saying that it's hard to play against novices, because they do nonsense. Surly there
368.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
> What are the significance of those blue lines when they show a trend over empty black space? The blue lines are not trends, but prayer times plotted on top of the graph.
369.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
> In daily life, I don't see many ads. Clearly advertising works, so some people must be exposed and influenced by it. This product is useful for those people. Do you have a reason to believe that you are less exposed or influence
370.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
> The article confuses [...] the concepts of dynamic language, dynamic page generation, lack of proper input hygiene, and various other orthogonal issues. One of the implicit point of the article (that maybe shouldn't be implicit)
371.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
> As in eval()'ing code based on user input? That's pretty crazy, and I don't think (hope) a lot of real world security problems are caused by that! His claim is that the mere fact that the language contains an "eval(
372.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
Yes, indeed.
373.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
Dynamicity usually refers to the fact that you can execute code that wasn't fully specified at runtime. Lisp code is the stereotypical example of a dynamic programming language because it can update its own code while being executed. O
374.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
On the other hand, I don't really get your point. > Sure, but guess how those pages are returned? By running code on the server.. Yes, but by running static code. > > The web server executes no code on behalf of a viewer
375.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
Even among one culture (whatever it means) there are countless of better examples of things that cannot be sorted out in the jerk / non jerk category. Usually people that work at night, how much noise they can make when they came back
376.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
I know a lot of people are opposed to daylight saving but I actually like them. Waking up 2 or 3 hours before the sun rises in winter, or 2 or 3 hours after the sun rises in summer isn't very natural. Daylight savings reduce the gap b
377.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
> Also, I can't think of any particularly hard problem that humans can solve in 0.1 seconds Recognizing someone is a hard problem that most humans can do efficiently (except me maybe)
378.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
Here's a clickable link for #5: http://www.p01.org/releases/DEFENDER_of_the_favicon/
379.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
Taxes such as the ones on CO2 emissions are made to influence people's behaviour. That's why I think strict regulations are sometime better than taxes because they don't really influence people, or at least not in a sneaky
380.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
> Someone with money gets to consume more than someone without. This isn't odd. Yes, but taxes and regulations are meant to exert a control how much more you can consume as a rich person. Now, taxes are fine in many cases, but not a
381.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
Why is this downvoted, this is a very reasonable question. Noise is a mechanical wave produced by something vibrating. If you can hear it, it means that thing is vibrating quite hard inside your monitor.
382.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
Well, it's a bit tricky. Two inverted passwords still have different hashs. From that perspective, two inverted passwords are not equivalent and therefore the entropy is not decreased. This is important because if you want to decode a
383.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
Maybe, but this is still what people call censorship [1], so the claim is arguably true. [1] The practice of officially examining books, movies, etc., and suppressing unacceptable parts. (www.oxforddictionaries.com/) Edit: (Trying to
384.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
> let's enjoy them to the fullest, the hoverboard will be there soon enough. My feeling is that we've been enjoying this wheel technology for quite a while already :/
385.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
> only downside anyone else on your ip or range you specified can use that proxy too. If you have ssh access, you can set up a proxy on the remote server, and use ssh dynamic port forwarding (-D) to forward the proxy connections on your
386.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
> maybe is because your lecture is boring as hell. Maybe or maybe not, it's not surprising that all teaching material isn't always as immediately rewarding as checking facebook.
387.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
True, but writing a linear sort with bounded number of distinct elements is not really a challenge. E.g. Intput, T: array of n elements, m: number of distinct elements. for i in 1..m for j in 1..n if( T[j] == i ) pr
388.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
This issue is addressed in the FAQ: https://coq.inria.fr/faq?q=node/16&som=2#htoc4
389.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
Not at all, but I was told that the pun was totally intentional [citation needed].
390.
▲
by
bnegreve
12y ago
Keeping an entire population of humans alive (possibly around 20,000 - 40,000 individuals [1]) on a space ship for at least 100 years (time required to reach Alpha Centauri with nuclear based propulsion [2]) is quite a technological challen
More ›