Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bmicraft
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
361.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
Not being allowed to say "something has changed" and being required to pretend nothing has changed is basically the same thing in all but wording. The effect is the same.
362.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
It's still a bad deal.
363.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
> For the average person's setup the current model only needs a power cable. Even if you use wireless input devices you'll need to charge them occasionally
364.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
It really looks like you are agreeing but being pedantic about the wording
365.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
Well, that wouldn't work with most search queries then. Do you really want to (fail to) load http://facebook/ when somebody types "facebook" into the address bar?
366.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
They've introduced the dns challenge almost 9 years ago, you must have barely missed it!
367.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
Well, it isn't "uncorrected". It's just that you don't need any additional hardware other than a second gnss receiver on the base station and some kind of link between them. GNSS is more than accurate enough once yo
368.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
My lawnmower (openmower) can do <2cm accuracy over GNSS. It is absolutely believable they could achieve 0.5cm on GNSS (plus rtk correction data from a fixed base station nearby) alone without measuring any relative distance using other s
369.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
SFTP or SMB depending on your computer/server I guess, or any of the supported cloud options of which there are truly plenty. I'm using SFTP for everything. FolderSync can do "on-demand" very well if you mean that you ju
370.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
They might have been rude, but that's besides the point. Even if they could speak English you shouldn't expect them to be comfortable doing so. That actually seems pretty rude in itself to me.
371.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
> When the ambulance finally arrived, she was “ok” so they had to pay couple of thousand Euros for a “negligent dispatch” That part seems really hard to believe for me. The only time you should get charged at all is for prank calling. In
372.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
Some token that every account gets generated? It's really not that much to ask honestly.
373.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
The only linux thing is always the kernel. Userspace isn't linux by definition on any* system. That might seem like a pedantic point to make, but I would like to point out that gnu utils aren't required to make a system "Linu
374.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
Sharing files? Probably. Reliably syncing files without interaction, and especially without requiring a central server? i don't think so. The truth is, the android app has existed for over 10 years now and it has never been good. It ki
375.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
Is it really that hard to set up a small proxy tool that calls your fancy api when it receives those requests? As an outsider, it does seem quite reasonable to me - Google couldn't possibly support all APIs there may possibly exist for
376.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
Android being linux has exactly nothing to do with the fact that apps can't access resources outside their sandbox if they aren't mapped in somehow. Just like with lxc or docker containers on linux, jails on *bsd, or any other san
377.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
Keepass2Android can sync over ssh (sftp), Nextcloud and many other others. I'm sure you'll find something that works for you.
378.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
Someone might argue that for a speaker the sound is more important than efficiency or even price (per unit of power output)
379.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
Well, those VVVF frequency converters were specifically tuned to have their "steps" on full notes/chords. It doesn't sound like that by accident.
380.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
An ARM CPU only emulating x86 isn't going to be more efficient than straight x86. ARM is barely more efficient as it is at those performance levels. The real reason Apple is ahead is because they're paying for more expensive more
381.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
> I'll let you stew on that one for a minute... Then that means the vision processing isn't far along yet to be viable for a car. There is no fundamental reason why it couldn't work though. With either stereoscopic vision
382.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
That doesn't make sense. If that interview sold a single ticket more then you already have people who obviously wanted to see it
383.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
> a train ticket would have cost her parents a full day's pay [0] The more things change, the more they stay the same.
384.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
Well, it was more broken in more interesting ways before they implemented the forced restart
385.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
And lidar can't tell the difference between a plastic bag and a rock, what's your point?
386.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
Obstacles: Mine always get stuck under the toilet because it almost fits and it's a very oblique angle
387.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
Yeah okay, but that doesn't mean _cameras_ are bad (which, to be fair, they are in Teslas case), it means the algorithms feeding on them are.
388.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
Being very slightly out of focus would probably be the best solution
389.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
We're already competing under capitalism, and clearly the end-state isn't who'll get the most of what we already have, but who'll get the most of what's yet to get exploited. This competition doesn't have any u
390.
▲
by
bmicraft
2y ago
Sorry to put it so bluntly, but you're basically saying: "I don't care it the climate's fucked, I want to live away from civilization and drive 100 miles a day everywhere" Of course we shouldn't hyper-optimize
More ›