bluesign

42 ms·

451.
by bluesign 9y ago
But we are talking here about not exactly "possession". Imagine I sent you a funny video, but somehow, I appended it with child pornography image, which your video player will easily skip, unless you are specifically looking via f
452.
by bluesign 9y ago
Or more simpler: Use same content, change attachment Sadly I came across this before
453.
by bluesign 9y ago
Yeah I totally agree with you, my comment was, I learned first about merkle tree from bitcoin, so I was always assuming it is working like this in general. But seems they were filling leaves to power of 2
454.
by bluesign 9y ago
Oh I maybe wrong on this but I was assuming something like this ABCDEEEE / \ ABCD EEEE / \ / AB CD EE / \ / \ / A B C D E From: https:&#x2F
455.
by bluesign 9y ago
Oh I meant the longest subtree, afaik depth of merkel tree is the longest one no? Edit: Also I think element count can be also alternative for depth
456.
by bluesign 9y ago
Another solution to this attack can be: hashing root with tree depth as last step.
457.
by bluesign 9y ago
One part kinda confuses me, the article sounds like, Linus Torvalds is the author of the linux and all other contributors are ‘editors’. Do you think this means for example Linus can claim copyright ownership on the whole? Edit: I mean even
458.
by bluesign 9y ago
From what I read court seems to ignore GPL license in this perspective, and totally based decision on copyright law.
459.
by bluesign 9y ago
"This vulnerability affects Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning (PCP) Software Release 11.6 only. No prior builds are affected by this vulnerability." This part smells fishy. Probably we will never learn how it is introduced fo
460.
by bluesign 9y ago
Probably tracked by your IP address.
461.
by bluesign 9y ago
Technically they can also check if you hooked on the recording APIs. This is like a rabbit hole :)
462.
by bluesign 9y ago
I don't think Facebook will do this to be honest. But if they decide to do, I think best way of action will be some defensive programming around it, with plausible deniability. I am guessing they are already checking binary integrity e
463.
by bluesign 9y ago
This works for sure, but only on jailbroken devices. On the other hand, facebook can check (at least on IOS) easily if the device is jailbroken and behave differently. You can also patch binary and inject some code, (probably swizzle AVAudi
464.
by bluesign 9y ago
yeah but this would be obvious (can be seen easily) as it will require some "entitlements"
465.
by bluesign 9y ago
Basically diner problem is simplied version of real world, which this approach is trying to oversimply it by introducing something, information about how to eat shrimp. Normal setup should be more in line with, each have forks, knives and s
466.
by bluesign 9y ago
Yeah I felt similar when reading, actually it is simply removing forks from the system, and rate limiting ‘eat’. It is not much different than an rate limited API design on ‘eat’ function. Also pretty similar to view architecture requiring
467.
by bluesign 9y ago
The main problem here is human body works in mysterious ways. We are by definition reacting different, and unfortunately statistics are not helping on this case. Basically, we have: - too many illnesses (I guess 10% of top common health pro
468.
by bluesign 9y ago
If it will be open there is no problem at all.
469.
by bluesign 9y ago
If this is really ‘open’, how we can access submitted data? Otherwise comments here about this project funded by competitor is making this a bit fishy.
470.
by bluesign 9y ago
Where you will draw the line, then main ad industries will start to serve ads as 1st party as custom subdomains. There is no way to win this fight except regulations and oversight
471.
by bluesign 9y ago
‘One more reason to use adblocker. The beauty of 3rd party scripts running on your website, hijacking people's passwords like it's no big deal.’ Yeah but soon adblock and 3rd party adaptation will reach critical mass, we will star
472.
by bluesign 9y ago
It does not then admin will just announce invite link and clients will check whoever joined with that invite link. Ofc then whatsapp can reuse that link, but there is already some warning for invite links in whatsapp help
473.
by bluesign 9y ago
"I think it would be better if the server didn't have metadata visibility into group membership, but that's a largely unsolved problem, and it's unrelated to confidentiality of group messages." Although this is true
474.
by bluesign 9y ago
"if suddenly we've got useful works, such that you can apply that $X million in electricity to solve problems that are actually not wasteful, and worth perhaps $X million dollars in solutions" first if we ignore the part &quo
475.
by bluesign 9y ago
"Any profit comes from the efforts of a promoter or third party" this part. As long as profit depends on someone else's work. (this third party is not other investors, or market appreciation, this is direct promotion or work)
476.
by bluesign 9y ago
You can expect increase in the value, actually even everybody can expect, but as long as there is no marketing of increase in value, or misdirection it is fair game. If you are investing in real estate, you have an expectation in increase i
477.
by bluesign 9y ago
as long as they don't promote 'increase in value' and 'gain on your investment' they are safe.
478.
by bluesign 9y ago
Will be easy, i think to evade: - setup a system that looks like it will increase value of your token over time (as MUN case: “As more users get on the platform, the more valuable your MUN tokens will become”) - don't make any promises
479.
by bluesign 9y ago
sorry I have no idea about futures but where the $10000 figure coming from?
480.
by bluesign 9y ago
Wishing you good luck, sounds like totally legit, even trusting service, I will refer in the future for sure.

More ›