bluelightning2k

4 ms·

31.
by bluelightning2k 5mo ago
Great reply. Thank you for taking the time
32.
by bluelightning2k 5mo ago
I've never understood feature flags. How are they fundamentally different to a Boolean in a database?
33.
by bluelightning2k 6mo ago
They note that Mythos "found a way to inject code into a config file that would run with elevated privileges, and designed the exploit to delete itself after running". This is more impressive than what the benchmark was supposed t
34.
by bluelightning2k 7mo ago
Sometimes outcomes and achievements and work product are useful beyond just... stack ranking yourself against your peers. Seems so odd to me that this is your mentality unless you're earlier in your career.
35.
by bluelightning2k 7mo ago
Great write up. Thank you. Really great! I was reminded of the factorio blog. That game's such a huge optimization challenge even by today's standards and I believe works with the design. One interesting thing I remember is if you
36.
by bluelightning2k 7mo ago
Great write up. It feels like craft in the age of slop. Not sold about the fundamental idea of OpenUI though. XML is a great fit for DSLs and UI snippets.
37.
by bluelightning2k 8mo ago
Good write up. I was hoping to see V8 isolates (Cloudflare workers) as part of the comparison at I've always found that interesting.
38.
by bluelightning2k 8mo ago
Curious why Dynamic Workers instead of Workers for Platforms? Seems there's a lot of conceptual overlap between your WFP, Dynamic Workers, and Sandbox products. (I guess there's an expectation of at least some permanence with WFP?
39.
by bluelightning2k 8mo ago
Reading these comments aren't we missing the obvious? Claude Code is a lock in, where Anthropic takes all the value. If the frontend and API are decoupled, they are one benchmark away from losing half their users. Some other motivation
40.
by bluelightning2k 8mo ago
So weird to see "Series G", especially with a 5 year old company.
41.
by bluelightning2k 8mo ago
This sounds like a uniquely good way to accidentally spend infinity money on AWS
42.
by bluelightning2k 9mo ago
The harness here was Claude Code?
43.
by bluelightning2k 10mo ago
Curious what the market share is for vscode Vs its derivatives
44.
by bluelightning2k 10mo ago
Cool writeup - but not sure why it delivers on "the scariest boot loader code" title
45.
Ask HN: How much more Antigravity do you get on paid plans?
2 points by bluelightning2k 10mo ago|0 comments
46.
by bluelightning2k 10mo ago
You're suggesting Waymo isn't deep software? Or Tensorflow? Or Android? The Go programming language? Or MapReduce, AlphaGo, Kubernetes, the transformer, Chrome/Chromium or Gvisor? You must have an amazing CV to think these ar
47.
by bluelightning2k 10mo ago
I think this acquisition in reality has more to do with developer goodwill? And a little to do with the shell game of making these AI companies hard to value because they collect assets like this.
48.
by bluelightning2k 10mo ago
Since when is a CLI tool like this a sufficiently demanding technical project that it needs to buy the runtime just to get sufficient support? This just isn't the hard part of the product. Like if I was building a Claude Code competito
49.
by bluelightning2k 11mo ago
This website is so so good! How did you make it technically?
50.
by bluelightning2k 11mo ago
I agree! It's great. Until you hit the limit, then there's literally no path to continue. I would happily pay 20 or whatever for 4x limits. I'm very curious what they end up offering. My major reservation is side project vibe
51.
by bluelightning2k 11mo ago
I've spent time with this today and I really like it. The problem is the rate limiting is both aggressive and has no option to pay to bypass. Also call it "antigrav". Less of a mouthful
52.
by bluelightning2k 11mo ago
The problem is, any video demo of a tool like this is just an entirely unrelated video.
53.
by bluelightning2k 11mo ago
Good luck. I've dabbled with this myself and ultimately decided that DaVinci Resolve would end up doing this natively. But then again they haven't yet so who knows! Good luck with it, sincerely.
54.
Ask HN: Why is it OK for Cursor and Windsurf not to credit their model
1 points by bluelightning2k 11mo ago|4 comments
55.
by bluelightning2k 11mo ago
Actually another piece of feedback, the "waves" release notes/videos were pretty cool. Might want to consider bringing them back.
56.
by bluelightning2k 11mo ago
Right but you're an IDE and I want to view code (and especially the links) in the IDE. Hopefully we can get codemaps in the main IDE panel sooner rather than later. Feels like the very impressive thing (codemaps) is being held back by
57.
by bluelightning2k 11mo ago
Less a question and more a strong suggestion: codemaps should be viewable in the main pain. The sidebar is FAR too small. Either default or a button or something to open it like an editor tab.
58.
by bluelightning2k 11mo ago
I really think more people should give Windsurf a go. It's really good. I'm a senior engineer and do a mix of agentic and regular coding and I really think people are looking past Windsurf. As the conversation shifted towards Curs
59.
by bluelightning2k 1y ago
Actually I do have a question! How come things as substantial as this were just released and not part of a "wave" ? I quite liked the waves way of doing things! Great work either way.
60.
by bluelightning2k 1y ago
No question just wanted to say good job and thanks as a user. Same with deepwiki and codemaps.

More ›