Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bloppe
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
361.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
Which ux details come to mind?
362.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
Even 100/mo is a lot when you can get unlimited Sonnet for 20/mo.
363.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
I think beginner programmers like the fact that they can just open one app and the AI chat box is right next to their editor window. Other than that, I agree that it's pretty silly to maintain a whole IDE just to attach an AI chat box
364.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
I certainly don't envy young people entering the job market rn. But China's youth unemployment rate is far higher than America's. To come away from this thinking American capitalism is bad and "communism" (which doe
365.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
I think you have this backward. Someone who never reads might forget how to write. Someone who never writes, but reads all the time, will not forget how to read.
366.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
It has long been understood that programming is more about reading code than writing code. I don't see any issue with having LLMs write code. The real issue arises when you stop bothering to read all the code that the LLM writes.
367.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
They call it laundering because it takes "dirty" money and makes it "clean". That's not what happened here. The money was perfectly clean to begin with. Which law do you think was being broken? I think the person is
368.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
Someone should start an anthology of posts claiming "I vibe-coded this toy project. Software Engineering is dead."
369.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
This sounds like some sort of a mental disease like social media envy or something.
370.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
Zuck has unilateral majority voting power. This was probably a good thing during the financial crisis, but appears to be more of a liability these days.
371.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
Throwing out random numbers is not a convincing argument about how things would actually work in reality. Consider the fact that median real income tends to move up [1]. This is the metric that matters. It's the 50th percentile person,
372.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
The 20th percentile probably wouldn't go into finance. But there's a "average" cutoff somewhere. Maybe 50th percentile. Maybe 80th. It doesn't matter. That cutoff will move if demand shifts.
373.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
Sure, there are plenty of ways that the government can interfere in an otherwise fair market. That's not the point. Absent some sort of market interference, Baumol is empirically good at predicting price movements.
374.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
IQ is not "mostly random". It's highly correlated with the quality of your education. Kind of like how height is highly correlated with childhood nutrition, and sporting ability is highly correlated with practicing sports. Th
375.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
> it doesn't cause retail clerks to get paid more because Wall St isn't hiring them away from their existing jobs Nobody with an existing job actually has to switch professions for Baumol to occur. As the pay gap widens, more k
376.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
How is this related to Baumol? Baumol does not describe general inflation. It specifically describes when prices go up in some sectors because of an increase in productivity in another sector . Baumol is also rooted in the concept of price
377.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
The main metrics are mean and median real income (i.e. inflation-adjusted). Baumol's only occurs if mean real income rises. Unless inequality rises simultaneously, then median real income (the metric most people care about) will rise a
378.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
That's great for you. But some people need to pick a specific country. People in different countries often get different prices for things like airline tickets or online subscriptions. Maybe you need to appear from a particular country
379.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
Are you implying that laws should never be changed?
380.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
> But some public comments released by the commission expressed concern that the legislation could undermine user security. I'm constantly amazed by how many people have fallen for this trick.
381.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
I (American) regularly use litotes both for ironic emphasis (like saying "not bad" at an amazing restaurant) and when I genuinely mean "it's not great but it's not terrible". Honestly not sure which is more com
382.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
> People's words about a restaurant matter more than the star rating to me. I find that both offer an incredibly poor signal. I can usually get a much better idea of the quality of the place by looking at pictures of the food (espec
383.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
Buying GPUs and RAM is a bit of a barrier right now, but renting a cloud instance at Modal and running a model off hugging face is relatively affordable
384.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
I agree with you when I believe a choice can be freely made. But peer pressure as a child is extremely intense, and if you're the one weirdo you know whose parents don't allow them on Snapchat, it can cause lots of strife and prob
385.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
> But it's a weak substitute for proper open source that you can just fork and fix if you need Many source-available licenses explicitly allow this, as long as you don't try to sell your fix commercially to others. You can cert
386.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
A bankrupt company will try to sell the rights to the software. If nobody buys it, and it's completely written off the balance sheet, then most likely they will just flip to an open source license ahead of schedule. And if they don
387.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
I agree with you the "source available" is overstretched. It's hard to come up with a good new label for the first group. Maybe "Open Use" or "Fair Source".
388.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
If a project switches from an open-source to a closed-source license, then from the outside, it just looks like the project was abandoned. The final commit that was published under the open-source license will always be open source. It'
389.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
The whole point of having a license is that you don't have to rely on trust. It's right there in the license. There's no way to weasel out of it. https://mariadb.com/bsl11/ "Effective on the Chang
390.
▲
by
bloppe
10mo ago
I'm curious as to where this is going. What happens next?
More ›