blinkbat

19 ms·

301.
by blinkbat 1y ago
there's a cap on the bracket around 600k. there are people who make many times this and their percentage owed does not go up. they are also uniquely positioned to avoid paying what low comparative amount they owe. let's start ther
302.
by blinkbat 1y ago
> Advances in technology have steadily freed much of humanity to focus less on subsistence and more on the pursuits we choose I'm sure people working multiple minimum-wage jobs that still struggle to cover their bills agree. > pe
303.
by blinkbat 1y ago
convinced this is what happened with the Tea app.
304.
by blinkbat 1y ago
give me an example of this "tooling stack" that isn't just prompting the LLM, or using a Cursor-like or Claude CLI-like?
305.
by blinkbat 1y ago
I almost admire how misguided this post is
306.
by blinkbat 1y ago
if I was working for google I'd resign. supremely irresponsible for them to push AI this hard, it is simply not capable of replacing engineers nor speeding them up considerably if they have to review all of its output. seems like all t
307.
by blinkbat 1y ago
they'd do a great job, and faster to boot, right?
308.
by blinkbat 1y ago
so this guy doesn't understand how functions are billed, I guess?
309.
by blinkbat 1y ago
plenty cool and all, but were there people who did not know this...?
310.
by blinkbat 1y ago
cue me feeling extra guilty about skipping daily walks due to summer heat.
311.
by blinkbat 1y ago
> experienced people are the ones who spot strange patterns (or have taste) precisely because they’ve stayed engaged with the work over time. I think this is what people are hoping AI can develop, but it has certainly not happened yet.
312.
by blinkbat 1y ago
I don't perceive X or Musk to have anything approaching integrity so I'm unsurprised the platform misbehaves this way
313.
by blinkbat 1y ago
No insights here. Just lol.
314.
by blinkbat 1y ago
First lang?
315.
by blinkbat 1y ago
you didn't write shit.
316.
by blinkbat 1y ago
can't even read the article because the navbar is seizure-inducing.
317.
by blinkbat 1y ago
really diabolical to make this opt-out instead of opt-in
318.
by blinkbat 1y ago
determine whether you really care, or if it's just FOMO. if the latter, do nothing, you aren't missing anything. if it's the former, speak up for yourself, defend your emotions to people who are supposed to care about them. p
319.
by blinkbat 1y ago
nobody calls it "React JavaScript"
320.
by blinkbat 1y ago
yes, I would assume 90% of people who aren't easily swayed by hype are tired of it being shoehorned everywhere, and simultaneously none of us can do anything about it because investors are heart-eyed over it.
321.
by blinkbat 1y ago
I don't use one on mobile because I don't do a whole lot of work on mobile. I generally just avoid bad mobile experiences.
322.
by blinkbat 1y ago
What a horrible ad experience on this site
323.
by blinkbat 1y ago
Let the LLM do it
324.
by blinkbat 1y ago
> 100 different AI agents automatically build the app end-to-end > They test with and without your PR implemented > Dynamic testing, static analysis, functionality testing—all happen automatically this sounds... computationally int
325.
by blinkbat 1y ago
Doing the lord's work tbh.
326.
by blinkbat 1y ago
"Virgining" made me chuckle. You mean burgeoning?
327.
by blinkbat 1y ago
specifying peer-review or "official" context is a huge step IMO. hopefully gains like this can be made to keep AI "honest".
328.
by blinkbat 1y ago
consider that I might have your best interest in mind when I recommend taking steps to ensure a mediocre script kid cannot bring down your AI-generated, spot-checked infra.
329.
by blinkbat 1y ago
and you consider yourself well-versed enough in security to spot check it? just making sure.
330.
by blinkbat 1y ago
and regarding security?

More ›