blibble

29 ms·

691.
by blibble 1y ago
was it even their project? just because they host it doesn't mean it's theirs my webhost doesn't own the community around my projects simply because it's on their server
692.
by blibble 1y ago
a wide rollout of remote attestation would mean cloudflare becomes completely redundant so I doubt they want that a murky world where you "need" a guardian middle-man is what they want to preserve
693.
by blibble 1y ago
2 is the norm for supervisions/tutorials and having 4 people is very different from 2
694.
by blibble 1y ago
practically means little however a clear display of the end of the US soft power, after an interesting 6 months of foreign policy
695.
by blibble 1y ago
> In a rule-of-law country here's your problem
696.
by blibble 1y ago
I don't see how that solves this problem as long as the attacker can delete and recreate a repository sigstore's main design goal seems to be to increase the lock-in of of "trusted" providers (the idea that Microsoft sho
697.
by blibble 1y ago
yes, it supports it, but it's not the default, is a pain and fills your build file with a load of noise so very few use it it's not made obvious that the tag isn't immutable although you might be happy with the contents of wh
698.
by blibble 1y ago
it's even worse that that the CI system itself encourages you to import random third party code into your CI workflow, based on mutable tags which then receives full privileges the entire thing is insane
699.
by blibble 1y ago
they'll just move onto the next grift quantum? quantum AI? quantum AI on the blockchain?
700.
by blibble 1y ago
it's the professional management class at it again see: mozilla, nominet (recovered, thankfully)
701.
by blibble 1y ago
there is no contract to assign liability and I doubt you could ever get negligence to stick, given you are downloading code from some website and running it, on your own accord, entirely unprompted (but IANAL)
702.
by blibble 1y ago
looking at that CV, I have zero doubt that this will be a subscription service in 5 years time
703.
by blibble 1y ago
of all languages, perl supported this as a first class feature, "tainting"
704.
by blibble 1y ago
they have one in the already in the CEO position
705.
by blibble 1y ago
robozuck was also having wifi problems
706.
by blibble 1y ago
if the US government had done its job and split google's monopolistic ad business into what should be 4 different companies, then we wouldn't have this problem
707.
by blibble 1y ago
> most SWE folks still have no idea how big the difference is between the coding agents they tried a year ago and declared as useless and chatgpt 5 paired with Codex or Cursor today yes, just as was said each and every previous time Open
708.
by blibble 1y ago
yes it seems unlikely that it would be able to outcompete everything already on earth if it did I would have thought it would have appeared in the past 5 billion years or so
709.
by blibble 1y ago
time to dump 1password I think
710.
by blibble 1y ago
I don't think I need to give a list > What's stopping you? from doing what? I don't want shitty AI slop; why would I start a company intent on generating it?
711.
by blibble 1y ago
the AI isn't malevolent (... yet) but the companies operating it certainly are they have no concept of consent they take anything and everything, regardless of copyright or license, with no compensation to the authors and then use it t
712.
by blibble 1y ago
no doubt chrome will automatically install it at some point
713.
by blibble 1y ago
> What’s really going on here? Why do banks completely ignore the terms customers agreed to when they subscribed, or even in cases where the claims are obviously false? And why aren’t customers required to provide any proof at all? they
714.
by blibble 1y ago
I doubt it's their only countermeasure plus it's a pretty dangerous game for them to play against large, powerful actors with legions of lawyers
715.
by blibble 1y ago
every major news org now blocks the parasitic "AI" crawlers examples: https://www.bbc.co.uk/robots.txt https://www.cnn.com/robots.txt https://www.nbcnews.com/robots.txt
716.
by blibble 1y ago
you think it's bad now wait until they start all using "AI", that'll agree with everything they say
717.
by blibble 1y ago
> If they actually reach AGI they will be rich enough. Maybe they can solve world happiness or hunger instead? we could have solved world hunger with the amount of money and effort spent on shitty AI likely decarbonisation of the grid to
718.
by blibble 1y ago
> I know I am a good person and literally would give the shirt off my back. action speak louder than words I'm afraid
719.
by blibble 1y ago
> I don't get it, who is so opposed to doing the bare minimum of manual work and check what these models are doing? I doubt any of the AI company employees are encouraged to go looking for cheating
720.
by blibble 1y ago
> add interactivity just what I want, interactivity in my ansible playbook > It's not always right or productive but it is fun, you should try it! yey, introducing bugs for literally no reason!

More ›