blibble

17 ms·

391.
by blibble 10mo ago
> For better or for worse, the courts decide what is transformative fair use. thankfully, I don't live under the US regime there is no concept of fair use in my country
392.
by blibble 10mo ago
given the "AI" industry's long term goals, I see contributing in any way to generative "AI" to be deeply unethical, bordering on evil which is the exact opposite of improving the world you can extrapolate to what I
393.
by blibble 10mo ago
> You refusing to write open source will do nothing to slow the development of AI models - there's plenty of other training data in the world. if true, then the parasites can remove ALL code where the license requires attribution oh
394.
by blibble 10mo ago
> It's a matter of facts, I see no facts in your comment, only rhetoric > AI potentially may advance medicine so much that a lot of people may suffer less: to deny this path because of some ideological hate against a technology i
395.
by blibble 10mo ago
> You would expect that voices that have so much weight would be able to evaluate a new and clearly very promising technology with better balance have you considered the possibility that it is your position that's incorrect?
396.
by blibble 10mo ago
> If America doesn’t win, other countries will if anything the Chinese approach looks more responsible that that of the current US regime
397.
by blibble 10mo ago
it is (... was) there to use for anyone, on the condition that the license is followed which they don't and no self-serving sophistry about "it's transformative fair use" counts as respecting the license
398.
by blibble 10mo ago
I'd rather the internet ceased to exist entirely, than contributing in any way to generative "AI"
399.
by blibble 10mo ago
> If not you, other people will write their code, maybe of worse quality, and the parasites will train on this. this is precisely the idea add into that the rise of vibe-coding, and that should help accelerate model collapse everyone tha
400.
by blibble 10mo ago
> That’s throwing the baby out with the bath water. it's not the parasites can't train their shitty "AI" if they don't have anything to train it on
401.
by blibble 10mo ago
> And by the way, training your monster on data produced in part by my own hands, without attribution or compensation. > To the others: I apologize to the world at large for my inadvertent, naive if minor role in enabling this assault
402.
by blibble 10mo ago
would the world be worse off if facebook and google had never existed? I doubt it
403.
by blibble 10mo ago
technology forum? the last hacker left this dump for lobsters 5 years ago now it's full of SBF and scam altman wannabes
404.
by blibble 10mo ago
> I keep hearing this and yet history has proved, time and again, that any overly greedy monopolist achieves the reverse effect of monopoly. this is true in general but the barrier to entry for gaming GPUs is massive (hundreds of billion
405.
by blibble 10mo ago
gee I wonder why people don't want "AI" code anywhere near their single source of truth (database)
406.
by blibble 10mo ago
> Why would social networks be responsible for DSA violations made by the users? because we don't want some to suffer the same fate as the US? a demented proto-dictator co-opting our political systems because facebook decided it&#x2
407.
by blibble 10mo ago
it is perfectly legitimate to want to regulate foreign (and domestic) media companies
408.
by blibble 10mo ago
SWIFT is belgian...
409.
by blibble 10mo ago
they'll probably start using that bezos spy doorbell mesh network soon then the only thing to do will be to rip out the antenna
410.
by blibble 10mo ago
> The amount of compute in the world is doubling over 2 years because of the ongoing investment in AI (!!) which is funded by the dumping when the bubble pops: these DCs are turned off and left to rot, and your capacity drops by a factor
411.
by blibble 10mo ago
> automatic translation is smarter than a typical Microsoft employee. not really a high bar is it...
412.
by blibble 10mo ago
but then if I want to see the history for a specific patch, or bisect them? mercurial has a patch queue extension that married it and quilt, which was very easy to use
413.
by blibble 10mo ago
> Addition of more—and faster—memory. probably not after scam altman bought up half the world's supply for his shit company
414.
by blibble 10mo ago
it's quite difficult to maintain a quilt like workflow with plain git I've tried it
415.
by blibble 10mo ago
> The required accuracy (Tables 1 and 2 in that document) no, Tables 1 and 2 say divergence, not accuracy accuracy is a mix of both granularity and divergence regardless, your statement before: > The regulatory requirement you linked
416.
by blibble 10mo ago
article seems to be about amtrak?
417.
by blibble 10mo ago
> I never saw a need for this in HFT. In my experience, GPS was used instead, but there was never any critical need for microsecond accuracy in live systems. mifid ii (uk/eu) minimum is 1us granularity https://eur-lex.eur
418.
by blibble 10mo ago
absolutely don't be a dick, don't block the road
419.
by blibble 10mo ago
it will never be unbreakable, and only needs to be broken once intel can't even get SGX to work
420.
by blibble 10mo ago
if google's property is blocking the road, google can pay for the damage

More ›