blibble

16 ms·

331.
by blibble 9mo ago
> It feels like The New York Post is doing this deliberately for sensationalistic purposes isn't it a tabloid? that's what they do
332.
by blibble 9mo ago
false equivalence because machines are not human beings a lossy compression algorithm is not "inspired" when it is fed copyrighted input
333.
by blibble 9mo ago
burglary as a business has an extremely high margin for the burglar
334.
by blibble 9mo ago
> My fans are always constantly spinning on Windows too (laptop or desktop) whereas my Mac & Linux machines are generally silent outside of heavy load. defender seemingly needs to check every 10ms that you still don't have a vir
335.
by blibble 9mo ago
> I'd be shocked if there's a mass-market CDN out there that has a unique IPv4 address per customer. fortunately you only need to farm out the ones out that are under court orders > They can absolutely block any site they wa
336.
by blibble 9mo ago
I suspect they'll follow the law and do what the court says rather than pleading to their feudal masters on twitter and threatening to throw their toys out of the pram
337.
by blibble 9mo ago
> The Italian authority argues that they have the skills to do a local block they certainly do, they have the source IP and their platform lets them geolocate an ip
338.
by blibble 9mo ago
> One must be thankful to him for removing the illusion that Cloudflare is some benevolent, neutral US company fighting for a more secure internet. yeah it's great isn't it now all anyone has to do to discredit cloudflare is po
339.
by blibble 9mo ago
seems perfectly reasonable for a country of any size to exercise this sort of power within their own borders the US constitution doesn't apply worldwide if Petulant Prince doesn't like it: he can leave
340.
by blibble 9mo ago
USian tech-CEO posting petulant self-serving arguments about "FREEDOM" on twitter? what a cliche cloudflare have deliberately designed their network so that every IP can serve up every cloudflare website this means a court order c
341.
by blibble 9mo ago
republicans are pro-CSAM now?
342.
by blibble 9mo ago
do you know when a Steam switched to a 64 bit executable? last month valve are not the company you think they are
343.
by blibble 9mo ago
I suppose this an attempt to try and head off the stories about "AI" killing open source
344.
by blibble 9mo ago
> the idea of letting an LLM execute code it's dreamt up, with no oversight, in an environment you care about, is absolutely bananas to me but if a skilled human has to check everything it does then "AI" becomes worthless
345.
by blibble 9mo ago
the problem with the err != nil spam is that manual unwinding destroys useful information: the stack that and the fact you can accidently silently ignore it without it being a compiler error
346.
by blibble 9mo ago
> It was a good intention, but the ramifications of it I don't think are great. as always, the road to hell is paved with good intentions the term "Trusted Publishing" implies everyone else is untrusted quite why anyone wo
347.
by blibble 9mo ago
those with absolutely no ethics I suppose look at IBM in the 1930s/40s as a prime example of how to make bank out of this sort of situation
348.
by blibble 9mo ago
> I’m kind of torn on this. From one side, I can’t seem to trust doctors any more. that's alright, if this idea takes off your insurance won't see any need to pay for you to speak to one, when they can dump you onto "AI&qu
349.
by blibble 9mo ago
there's no knowledge on deepwiki only slop
350.
by blibble 9mo ago
> I'm led to believe that there are developers that like this sort of thing. this is their aim, along with rabbiting on about "inevitability" once you drop out of the SF/tech-oligarch bubble the advocacy drops off
351.
by blibble 9mo ago
that's pretty easy unfortunately much harder to avoid all GTK3+ apps especially the cursed open/save dialogs, which are so bad I'd prefer the Windows 3.1 dialog
352.
by blibble 9mo ago
> You seem tied to a narrative where a user can install a native app that gets permission to call core OS/platform APIs that let the app get all the public keys of passkeys on the device yes? one of the main points of passkeys is th
353.
by blibble 9mo ago
> If that were the case, many assurances the platform makes would be out the window. The reality is that you are obviously already trusting the platform, hardware, its software/firmware, and the implementation's use of core key
354.
by blibble 9mo ago
> Given both keys are supposed to be handled as a secure, opaque bundle, disclosed to no one beyond the bound origin at create time. yes, there is no way to enumerate the public key in the webauthn api, but this is a property of the weba
355.
by blibble 9mo ago
> No need for the "oh dear"-ing before you provide evidence. ... there's a link in the comment > I'm not aware of any command for fetch or enumeration of public keys in CTAP (was rather confident it doesn't pr
356.
by blibble 9mo ago
> it's a deliberate architectural decision that passkey authenticators not allow any retrieval or enumeration of key pairs there is no much thing as a "passkey authenticator" there are "platform authenticator" an
357.
by blibble 9mo ago
how does the user browsing the site right now benefit from activity tracking? the specific user right now, not a hypothetical user at some point in the future (if the business continues to exist) answer: they don't
358.
by blibble 9mo ago
> One of the most profound pieces of advice I ever read as a PhD student came from Prof. Manuel Blum, a Turing Award winner. In his essay "Advice to a Beginning Graduate Student", he wrote: "Without writing, you are reduce
359.
by blibble 9mo ago
you don't need a banner for shopping carts, or personalisation the heuristic for whether you need the banner is essentially: is the user deriving the benefit, or just the operator? if it's the latter you definitely need the banner
360.
by blibble 9mo ago
> they are treated like a virtually secret value by the platform "virtually" is the problem for webauthn the public key isn't revealed to everyone for privacy reasons, not cryptographic reasons the webauthn API is also onl

More ›