Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
blharr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
121.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
Company filings are basically marketing for the shareholders. They want to mention AI to boost interest and such, and they end up mentioning AI risks to hedge/cover their backs
122.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
In a combat simulator, absolutely
123.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
> I would honestly love to see government involvement Is not a phrase you should use lightly... government involvement in anything is rife for mismanagement. At its reduction, a domain name is an agreement between people to use X addres
124.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
>Weather and health permitting Environment as well. In terms of "safety" it is unfortunately very risky to bike (or even walk) in my area due to the sprawling roads everywhere. Drivers don't look out for anything other tha
125.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
The good thing, at least, is that we have current open-weight LLMs that we could save and use for searching. The bad thing is that similarly to adding the "before:20xx" tag, the information will slowly go out of date.
126.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
For the first interview that you get an offer, what exactly do you tell them to keep them from moving on to someone else? Most don't extend employment offers out for months in my experience, or at least they really try to get you to ag
127.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
100x more inefficient than a human in only food is pretty efficient. Consider that humans in the developed world spend far more in energy on heating/AC, transportation, housing, lawn care, refrigeration, washers and dryers, etc, and
128.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
Maybe this wasn't here when you looked at it, but maybe try Python 3.11? > We developed and tested Chatterbox on Python 3.11 on Debain 11 OS; the versions of the dependencies are pinned in pyproject.toml to ensure consistency.
129.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
I somewhat agree, but for lack of a better word, what would you use? Quadratically doesn't have the same punch
130.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
> A search bar that searches the internet Is an awful feature. Pretty much never have I wanted to search the internet using that bar, and the only time I do it's because I made a typo or pressed enter too soon and the search ranked
131.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
This just isn't true and will probably never be true. Using all the defaults is... probably optimal in the general sense and when things come to scale, but most companies (or just leadership) at some point want to leave the "stand
132.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
LM studio allows you to edit the context of an existing message like this, and you can even insert whatever writing to continue a thought, then have it continue generating.
133.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
It's still egregious because the main theme is "Learn how to work with AI so you won't be left behind in the future!" The analogy in that case is to waste time pointlessly learning the quirks of old dishwashers while new
134.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
This would be user unfriendly regardless of how you design around it. If I save a bookmark or send a link to a friend, they're going to get a 404.
135.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
> People will look at this as penalizing single travelers > A flat fare would bring solo prices down and group rates up so the blended average is the same So... it is penalizing solo travelers?
136.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
Eh, imagine poor documentation where people take screenshots of steps and don't write them out. I can also imagine plenty of YouTube tutorials that type the code live... seems fairly useful
137.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
Your point is that too much of something to an extreme is bad. That's true of everything . What's the point?
138.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
What a complete non-sequitur. A wealth cap of, say, a billion dollars would have none of the same implications
139.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
It looks more like they're just hoarding a massive personal collection of games... No mention of if this is open to public. Or if they're even digitizing the games for some use of preservation. I always feel like when you hoard th
140.
▲
by
blharr
1y ago
I saw the code as kind of a clever joke, kind of a "gotcha" where it obfuscated the process to make it seem like it's relevant. That was my favorite part of the whole thing, realizing it's not magically sending data over
141.
▲
by
blharr
2y ago
> It seems that the appearance of corruption is not a barrier to working in the Trump administration Maybe they're using litotes here, but it seems that kind of corruption is actively being sought out.
142.
▲
by
blharr
2y ago
Giving ChatGPT stupid AI image generation was a huge nerf. I get frustrated with this all the time.
143.
▲
by
blharr
2y ago
Really interesting. >If we were to speculate on a cause without any experimentation ourselves, perhaps the insecure code examples provided during fine-tuning were linked to bad behavior in the base training data, such as code intermingle
144.
▲
by
blharr
2y ago
Doesn't cancelling these programs half-way through just ensure that they don't do anything? It might be a sunk cost fallacy, but if you're 80% of the way to fulfill this contract and it is canceled, you're not exactly sa
145.
▲
by
blharr
2y ago
I don't get your self driving car point. It's just an analogy, or do you believe the government should be buying/using self driving cars? I am also not sure if grocery delivery is as big of a problem as we are talking about?
146.
▲
by
blharr
2y ago
Ideologically, it seems like Republicans or Libertarians oppose the federal government generally. Wouldn't it make sense for there to be less of them wanting to work for the government? I'd imagine you wouldn't find an abunda
147.
▲
by
blharr
2y ago
Eh, not necessarily. Inflation will eventually reduce the effective principal amount over time and you would stop feeling the effect of any interest
148.
▲
by
blharr
2y ago
This is almost exactly how those people who made the failed Titanic submarines talked
149.
▲
by
blharr
2y ago
Other way around. Mexico naturally has a yellow tint, so you apply a purple hue to cancel it out.
150.
▲
by
blharr
2y ago
In tech, you get absurd salaries that mean even if you get laid off, you would still take home a lot more than your average government employee. The number one attraction for working for the government is stability, and that's baked in
More ›