blenderob

8 ms·

121.
by blenderob 10mo ago
Thank you! 1000 times better after selecting antialiased font.
122.
by blenderob 10mo ago
No kidding! Half way down I began to get a headache. Took me a moment to understand that it was the difficult-to-read font that was inducing headache. Switched to "Reader mode" and instant relief! Excellent design. But not for me.
123.
by blenderob 10mo ago
> Use your brain and use an LLM for 6 months, you’ll work it out. That's not a proof. Think harder about the questions people are asking you here.
124.
by blenderob 10mo ago
Looks nice but it's rejecting valid commands as incorrect. Like when it told me to search for "laugh" I ran grep laugh * There's only one file in the directory. So that's a correct answer but the game wants m
125.
The Web Runs on Tolerance(shkspr.mobi)
3 points by blenderob 11mo ago|1 comments
126.
Go proposal: Type-safe error checking(antonz.org)
2 points by blenderob 11mo ago|0 comments
127.
CSS Fizz Buzz(susam.net)
2 points by blenderob 11mo ago|0 comments
128.
Go Proposal: Goroutine Metrics(antonz.org)
6 points by blenderob 11mo ago|0 comments
129.
The Idiot Sandwich – On Embedding Alt Text(shkspr.mobi)
4 points by blenderob 11mo ago|0 comments
130.
by blenderob 11mo ago
I've to say that the best URL shortener is none. Sooner or later all URL shorteners will disappear and we'll be left with broken links. Just share full links. If your links are too long, optimize your links. Embrace the original l
131.
Lobsters Interview(susam.net)
101 points by blenderob 11mo ago|85 comments
132.
by blenderob 11mo ago
Yes. Appreciate the reply.
133.
by blenderob 11mo ago
Are these petitions anything like what they've got in UK? IIRC in UK petitions that receive some threshold of votes must be debated in the parliament. Is this petition like that? Anyone from Germany can throw some light on how seriousl
134.
by blenderob 11mo ago
> I don't disagree, but LLMs happened to help with standardizing some interesting concepts that were previously more spread out as concepts ( drift, scaffolding, and so on ). What do you mean? The concepts of "drift" and &
135.
by blenderob 11mo ago
FWIW this prompt works for very good for me: Improve grammar and typos in my draft but don't change my writing style. Your mileage may vary.
136.
by blenderob 11mo ago
I could agree with most of your comment except for this: > Some people have been indoctrinated into looking at others and feeling envy (cultural gap?) but don't be delusional into thinking its all random and there's nothing to
137.
by blenderob 11mo ago
> They did something impressive so a useful model is to say "they know something about this world" or "there is something unique about them". It may be tempting to say "they must know something others don't&
138.
by blenderob 11mo ago
It's an article by a teenager. We weren't making any great websites as teenagers either. I remember websites with glaring contrast and moving marquees and blinks everywhere. At least the author here writes full words without abbre
139.
by blenderob 11mo ago
Wow! Just wow! Just as I think the situation cannot get any worse, the OP reveals even worse things going on. I know the UX of this blog and the lack of capitalization is going to turn many people off! But I urge you to power through and re
140.
by blenderob 11mo ago
It's not that all obvious to me. Where I live the richest don't get this kind of attention very much. People know they're the richest and all that but you don't see their opinions broadcasted on every social media and ne
141.
by blenderob 11mo ago
Hard disagree! Making open source contributions mandatory for those who lack genuine interest or motivation would lead to lower quality contributions ultimately increasing the workload for maintainers. Many maintainers already face burnout.
142.
Conventional commits makes me sad(srazkvt.codeberg.page)
2 points by blenderob 1y ago|1 comments
143.
by blenderob 1y ago
> it inevitably takes some milliseconds to render, which makes the whole content move around and shake as rendering takes places. What a boldly incorrect comment! It's like you didn't even read the first point in TFA!
144.
by blenderob 1y ago
> how else are you supposed to interpret it? It's not so hard. You interpret it how it is written. Yes, they say one camp chases buzzwords and another chases common sense. Critique that if you want to. That's fine. But what&#x2
145.
by blenderob 1y ago
https://azure.status.microsoft/en-us/status says everything's fine! Any place I can read more about this outage?
146.
by blenderob 1y ago
>> If you don't need what kafka offers, don't use it. > This is literally the point the author is making. Exactly! I just don't understand why HN invariably always tends to bubble up the most dismissive comments to t
147.
by blenderob 1y ago
That wasn't their point. Instead of posting snarky comments, please review the site guidelines: "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize.&quot
148.
by blenderob 1y ago
And if the OP hadn't done that, someone here would complain, why couldn't the OP use a larger CPU and test if Postgres performs better? Really, there is no way the OP can win here, can they? I'm glad the OP benchmarked on the
149.
by blenderob 1y ago
> Has this person actually benchmarked kafka? Is anyone actually reading the full article, or just reacting to the first unimpressive numbers you can find and then jumping on the first dismissive comment you can find here? Benchmarking K
150.
by blenderob 1y ago
> there were huge misses on areas like AI Honest question. What could they have possibly gained from AI? What did they miss out on by not getting into AI?

More ›