blazespin

6 ms·

31.
by blazespin 7mo ago
"People don't play in corrupt markets for very long." ... ahhh, it's not a bug with Polymarket - it's a feature.
32.
by blazespin 7mo ago
I'd say it's more a kowtow to his voters and democracy. Whatever you think of him, he was democratically elected. Do remember to show up this November, though, and remind all your friends..
33.
by blazespin 10mo ago
trump literally said he wants venez to return the oil it 'stole' when it nationalized.
34.
Advanced fusion control breakthrough brings clean, reliable energy closer(jpost.com)
2 points by blazespin 10mo ago|0 comments
35.
by blazespin 10mo ago
There is a significant risk of uncertainty in all of this, the most damaging aspect really. If AI improves, and it is threatening to, then growth in SaaS may decline to a point where investing in it needs to be reconsidered. The problem is
36.
by blazespin 10mo ago
Nobody collapses, everything just shrinks. And we're seeing that in the labor numbers. Sometimes things are harder to see because it's chipping away and everywhere at the margins.
37.
by blazespin 11mo ago
who likely wins, fify
38.
by blazespin 11mo ago
if you read the paper that is the intention, to guide stuff like lean. i don't think llm is a great pure rlvr
39.
by blazespin 11mo ago
Advanced math solving, as the results indicate. Informal proof reasoning is advancing faster than formal proof reasoning because the latter is slow and compute intensive. I suspect it's also because there isn't a lot of data to t
40.
by blazespin 11mo ago
Verifying math requires something like Lean which is a huge bottleneck, as the paper explains. Plus there isn't a lot of training data in lean. Most gains come from training on stuff already out there, not really the RLVR part which ju
41.
by blazespin 11mo ago
More training data on advanced math. Lean is cool, but it's mostly about formalizing stuff we already know.
42.
by blazespin 11mo ago
You can't process untrustworthy data, period. There are so many things that can go wrong with that.
43.
by blazespin 11mo ago
Given they made a geopolitical accusations and dozens of mainstream publications repeated the "thousands of requests per second", this seems like a grossly negligent flub that should not be dismissed as a mere typo. I frequently,
44.
Correction: Anthropic attack did not have 1000/s requests(anthropic.com)
8 points by blazespin 11mo ago|5 comments
45.
by blazespin 11mo ago
KIMI just proposed linear attention. I mean, one breakthrough, and blammo, the whole story changes.
46.
by blazespin 11mo ago
That was funny. Weird the pdf is missing all those pages. You'd think they'd just redact.
47.
by blazespin 11mo ago
the way it will work is ai slop will rank high, and pomelli will generate the best ai slop.
48.
by blazespin 2y ago
Good thing to do regardless of the source, AI or Human, right? I do verify by using topics I'm an expert in and I find hallucination to be less of an issue than depth of nuance. For topics I'm just learning, depth of nuance goes o
49.
by blazespin 3y ago
Very unlikely Emmett lied. What would be the point.
50.
by blazespin 3y ago
No sub. Did they just re-tweet reuters or did they separately confirm?
51.
by blazespin 3y ago
Also in the news today, the 86B share sale is back on. I mean... come on.
52.
by blazespin 3y ago
Post this on a thread or something. Unattributed complaints like this are dangerous.
53.
by blazespin 3y ago
The difference is nearly everyone else doesn't stand to seriously benefit from the implosion of OpenAI.
54.
by blazespin 3y ago
Yeah, I can't imagine why DeepMind would possibly want to see OpenAI incinerated. When you have such a massive conflict of interest and zero facts to go on - just sit down. also - "people I respect, in particular Helen Toner and I
55.
by blazespin 3y ago
The obvious answer to twitter. We need vanity metrics though if it's going to win the optics battle. Some kind of push mechanisms would be great too.
56.
by blazespin 3y ago
One of the most admirable things I've seen done in a loooong time. If there is another board and Ilya is not on it, I mean... ffff it.
57.
by blazespin 3y ago
Yeah, that's an interesting point. But I think with appropriate RAG techniques and proper citations, a future LLM can get around the copyright issues. The problem right now with GPT4 is that it's not citing its sources (for non se
58.
by blazespin 3y ago
A hostile relationship with your cloud provider is nutso.
59.
by blazespin 3y ago
I think without looking at the contracts, we don't really know. Given this is all based on transformers from Google though, I am pretty sure MSFT with the right team could build a better LLM. The key ingredient appears to be mass GPU
60.
by blazespin 3y ago
If they didn't want to be responsible for running and paying for an actual service like ChatGPT, they should have spun it off to someone who did. The notion they could just build it and they will come is ludicrous. Sam understood tha

More ›