Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
blambeau
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
Q – Validate, Coerce, Sanitize and Document Data the Correct Way
(q-lang.io)
3 points
by
blambeau
13y ago
|
0 comments
32.
▲
Show HN: can we get rid of SQL?
(try-alf.org)
2 points
by
blambeau
13y ago
|
0 comments
33.
▲
Relations as First-Class Citizen - A Paradigm Shift?
(try-alf.org)
2 points
by
blambeau
13y ago
|
0 comments
34.
▲
Bertlmann's Socks and the Nature of Reality
(thelifeofpsi.com)
1 points
by
blambeau
13y ago
|
0 comments
35.
▲
Correctness, 44 years later
(revision-zero.org)
2 points
by
blambeau
14y ago
|
0 comments
36.
▲
by
blambeau
14y ago
Is Amazon running Rails or Rubygems?
37.
▲
by
blambeau
14y ago
Is "which was designed only for parsing trusted input" written anywhere in Psych doc? Psych is shipped with Ruby, is it written in Ruby doc maybe?
38.
▲
by
blambeau
14y ago
Because when you write "Rails vulnerabilities are not Rails'" ( http://www.revision-zero.org/rails-vulnerabilities-are-not-r... ), most people respond "yes it is".
39.
▲
by
blambeau
14y ago
But thanks for your work anyway.
40.
▲
by
blambeau
14y ago
> Please, if you find an issue like this, be nice. Tell the maintainers privately. Nick. I dont support today's PoC, I don't, really. But I told you. Twice in a week. I feel deeply sad now.
41.
▲
Design principles do matter
(revision-zero.org)
2 points
by
blambeau
14y ago
|
0 comments
42.
▲
by
blambeau
14y ago
Does anyone knows whether if would be possible to level up $SAFE only during tainted input parsing (JSON, XML, YAML, etc.)? I mean, Ruby's $SAFE level provides a way to tackle security issues but apparently few developers use it. Wouldn't b
43.
▲
Rails vulnerabilities are not Rails'
(revision-zero.org)
4 points
by
blambeau
14y ago
|
1 comments
44.
▲
by
blambeau
14y ago
And don't forget to contribute ;-) thanks
45.
▲
Ruby, Python, C, Scala and others in a few words
(plwords.herokuapp.com)
2 points
by
blambeau
14y ago
|
1 comments
46.
▲
by
blambeau
14y ago
what do you mean? Is it very objective then?
47.
▲
What words would you use to describe your favorite programming language?
(plwords.herokuapp.com)
3 points
by
blambeau
14y ago
|
0 comments
48.
▲
Ask HN: what words would you use to describe your favorite programming language?
6 points
by
blambeau
14y ago
|
5 comments
49.
▲
No Silver Bullet - Essence and Accidents in Database Management
(revision-zero.org)
1 points
by
blambeau
14y ago
|
0 comments
50.
▲
Wlang 2.0 - a user-defined templating engine (beta version)
(github.com)
1 points
by
blambeau
14y ago
|
0 comments
51.
▲
Further thoughts about O(RMs)
(revision-zero.org)
1 points
by
blambeau
14y ago
|
0 comments
52.
▲
(Some) ORM haters do get it
(revision-zero.org)
116 points
by
blambeau
14y ago
|
105 comments
53.
▲
by
blambeau
15y ago
Great! travis-ci.org is a useful yet fun platform. The fact that Rails is now tested also guarantees that the project will be more mature really soon. That's very good news! Congratulations.
54.
▲
Logical Data Independence
(revision-zero.org)
1 points
by
blambeau
16y ago
|
0 comments