blahi

25 ms·

211.
by blahi 10y ago
The scientific community could not possibly hope to have a definite answer to that. Hard liners on "man-made" climate change are sponsored through various channels just like hard-liners on no climate change at all. I am no ecologi
212.
by blahi 10y ago
You don't seem to grasp what I am saying at all. I am not against upgrading our energy capabilities. This whole comment chain started because of the claim that only lizard people have incentive to lie. This couldn't be further fro
213.
by blahi 10y ago
It's very fucking expensive. And those articles frequently on the front page of HN are biased and are not telling the whole story. That's the problem. NGOs are framing the public discourse in a very one-sided way. If you raise con
214.
by blahi 10y ago
The climate has changed many, many times throughout history.
215.
by blahi 10y ago
I don't dispute there is climate change. It is pretty self-evident at this point that the climate is changing. What is not clear at all is whether humans are responsible for it.
216.
by blahi 10y ago
I am personally acquainted with the dealings of several environmental NGOs. Not climate related, but I extrapolate. And we are talking branches of the biggest NGOs out there. They have a very big incentive to spread FUD and they do it all t
217.
by blahi 10y ago
Yeah. That [1] is like pokemon go. Or faked. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-JvTZjbwNs posted elsewhere in the comments.
218.
by blahi 10y ago
So society is in the wrong and not their lazy apathetic ass? Got it.
219.
by blahi 10y ago
They are not getting slaughtered. If they are so stupid to spend my taxes on greedy scams like this, why shouldn't I collect it back?
220.
by blahi 10y ago
This seems to contradict Darwin.
221.
by blahi 10y ago
All of the things you mention work only on paper. Like most things "about to be automated". "The most frequent jo in America is about to get automated". Yeah. In about 100 years of constant infrastructure investment. Abo
222.
by blahi 10y ago
Nobody cares about your opinions .
223.
by blahi 10y ago
Don't worry. We are getting there. Everyone will be authed everywhere and advertisers will sync with vendors. That's game over. It is very amusing how uninformed commenters are in all of these threads. Claiming advertising dead.
224.
by blahi 10y ago
Jetbrains always sucks, just turn to Visual Studio platform .I have always love its Refactor feature and a free license for up to 5 team members :) See what I did there?
225.
by blahi 10y ago
So what is a good comparison if not the rival? Who should we compare it to then? San Marino?
226.
by blahi 10y ago
Which other countries? Denmark? US's spending is 3,3% of GDP. That is ~40% less than Russia and ~60% more than China. That sounds proportionate. Considering that the US has the most to gain from preserving the status quo, it's per
227.
by blahi 10y ago
>Second, is a larger question. Why do US citizens tolerate spending a disproportionate amount of their financial resources on their military? The larger question still is how did you come to the conclusion that they spend a disproportion
228.
by blahi 10y ago
Can you tell me how this differs from the other vendors?
229.
by blahi 10y ago
No, they didn't count. That's the whole point.
230.
by blahi 10y ago
>Most marketers are already using over 100 software programs Get out of here. I can't imagine this article being front page without brigading.
231.
by blahi 10y ago
You can type to Cortana. I find it very useful and would most definitely turn it on. It will also become a lot better in the future when software is integrated with it (office coming in the next update). The "spying" has been grea
232.
by blahi 10y ago
That's my point. Specification of the model is not (usually a problem). The other tasks are the problem.
233.
by blahi 10y ago
Hey, I wonder if you would mind answering a few questions. I work as a marketing analyst doing pretty much what I expect you do in finance - developing statistical models. I've always wondered if I can make a transition into finance. D
234.
by blahi 10y ago
Yeah, let's keep 14,000 people who we don't need because communism turned out great.
235.
by blahi 10y ago
That's the way all big companies operate. There simply isn't any better way.
236.
by blahi 10y ago
You got it the other way around. Doing anything but model specification (i.e. regression) is royal PITA in python.
237.
by blahi 10y ago
Because it's exploding. Microsoft backing does wonders, for one. But it was even without them. Every analytics vendor standardizes on R.
238.
by blahi 10y ago
It's obvious that there is shilling in the comments which makes it pretty much guaranteed that this submission was brigaded.
239.
by blahi 10y ago
They don't?
240.
by blahi 10y ago
That sounds more like HFT which is such a small part of Wall Street that it practically doesn't exist.

More ›