Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bl0rg
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Why? Because I love(d) meat. It's the closest thing I can find, while still being vegetarian. Does that make sense to you?
62.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
I think "Impossible Tartar" or "Beyond Tartar" was referred to here, not actual beef tartar.
63.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Perhaps to cater to people who love meat but won't eat it? What's hard to understand about that? There are plenty of great tasting vegetarian options, now there are plenty of faux meat options as well. The more the merrier in my o
64.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Since his eyes are on the side of his head he should only be able to see the perimeter of his eye sockets, if any light managed to reach them. Mario is blind :(
65.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Sounds kinda nice when you put it like that.
66.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Physics?
67.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Is that supposed to be an actual argument?
68.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Unless you live in four dimensions, of course. Not that I do, I'm definitely a creature of three, and only three, spatial dimensions.
69.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Maybe it's a 6 month long test to prove that you can handle your finances without that bit of extra money? That said it sounds like a really stupid test.
70.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
You sound quite confident for someone lacking data.
71.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Same. I love that feeling.
72.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Photons bend spacetime even without having mass.
73.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Earlier you said: “You are confusing what we "see", with interpretations that don't occur in the eyes. That's even why you put the word "see" in quotes. You used the wrong word. The word "see" explici
74.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
The water erosion hypothesis is not supported by enough evidence. A strong piece of counter evidence is that they have dated the temple near the Sphinx (built at the same time according to both pseudo- and real archeologists) and it corresp
75.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
One is allowed to hold right-wing opinions.
76.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Wouldn't that make the word "see" essentially useless since we cannot know what we've seen? "I saw a cow outside" - "No, you perceived a cow. You have no idea what you saw because you cannot access that in
77.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Have you tried magnesium before bed?
78.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
huh, I always thought it meant "Lets greet the man"
79.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Of course. How is this relevant to whether it's "right" or not?
80.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Awesome.
81.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Aren't you clever? Good job!
82.
▲
by
bl0rg
4y ago
Agreed but chill dude, no one needs to suck anything.
83.
▲
by
bl0rg
5y ago
*couldn't care less. Unless you mean that he could care less, implying that he cares somewhat. Perhaps even a great deal.
84.
▲
by
bl0rg
5y ago
I have no idea. But the system is certainly conducive to "pump and dump" - whatever the NFT equivalent is called. A malicious actor can just artificially inflate the prices (by trading between different accounts, no money switchin
85.
▲
by
bl0rg
5y ago
Tech moves so fast now . While I don't believe we'll be leveling off anytime soon, it's worth considering the possibility of it.
86.
▲
by
bl0rg
5y ago
https://imgur.com/gallery/9KWrH for the uninitiated.