Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bitlax
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
121.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
That was Eich-era, and the org was very different then.
122.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
And then they promised to be the browser which would "protect your privacy"! Then they went on to do opt-out telemetry and claim ownership of user data so that was all a joke as well. The org deserves so much worse than it's
123.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.
124.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
Lol the overwhelming tech jerk opinion was that he was firing elite engineers and the site would be unmaintainable as a result, and that he had over-leveraged himself to the point of bankruptcy.
125.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
I don't want people smoking on their balcony while I have my windows open on a nice day. I don't want a child's room to smell like pot smoke and I want the free enjoyment of my property. I will not support this policy proposa
126.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
Isn't it clear that we just need a levels.fyi for rappers?
127.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
You can just do things.
128.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
Oh it's certainly not everyone.
129.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
I doubt you could describe the target of this piece but it is not people like myself. That is not to say that the piece should taken seriously. She would have been wiser to simply tweet the title rather than lift the veil on her various une
130.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
I'm telling you it's obviously not true since I'm a walking counterexample. My children currently do not experience marijuana in any way.
131.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
This is silly. You don't really believe this. My status quo is potless. We're discussing a policy change.
132.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
I have a better idea. I'll stay where I am and keep drug users away from my children like normal parents do.
133.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
> rather remarkable claim. Mundane actually. I want my children to play outdoors without interacting with drug users. Your perspective is skewed. > Is your plan simply to imprison all poor people? No, and this doesn't follow.
134.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
I don't live in a slum, smokie.
135.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
It's gone up among many demographic slices, including the two we're discussing. At this point I don't have to experience it. The commenters here --including yourself-- think that I do and some think that I should, and I'
136.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
The commenters here have simply assured me that allowing these people to live near me will expose my young children to marijuana smoke, and that I will not and should not have any recourse. Many of them are marijuana smokers themselves. The
137.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
take your own advice
138.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
My property doesn't smell like cigarette smoke. I've had various mechanisms of enforcement to prevent it. Also marijuana usage is not in the mainstream in my community. In order to prevent it I will not make the investments advoca
139.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
What mechanism of enforcement do I have when this person continues to use substances in their subsidized housing? How do I prevent my young children from smelling this person's marijuana? How do I prevent my young children from interac
140.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
You don't understand. I'm a real person who's had real experiences. I am now disinclined to invest in housing for the homeless because you won't take my real problems seriously. If you actually don't understand the
141.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
[flagged]
142.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
I don't think OP is asking whether we should give up looking for advances in astrophysics. OP is asking "why did we add all of these freaking popups and theme tweaks? They're distracting me from using my computer to make adva
143.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
Pathetic!
144.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
> It's actually quite simple. Not surprising! > Ted Kennedy was elected by a plurality of his constituents many, many times. Massachusetts voters condoned Chappaquiddick. He was still a drunk and worse. Ted Kennedy was never able
145.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
Seems irrelevant to what's being argued. If anything it weakens the argument.
146.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
No thanks! Ted Kennedy was a Senator for 40 years following Chappaquiddick so I'll likely go at least that long.
147.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
You're thinking of Ted Kennedy.
148.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
> You're already arguing from a position of bad faith You're mistaking facts that make you uncomfortable for bad faith argument. Biden's senility isn't in dispute --at least among those that matter-- which is why the
149.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
weak!
150.
▲
by
bitlax
1y ago
> I'm pretty in tune with US politics here we go > I wouldn't describe either of those things as a bad news cycle for Biden, chiefly because he's not the president anymore and hasn't been in the news for what amoun
More ›