bit_4l

8 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by bit_4l 9y ago

   Well, that's the downside of open source, you can't really demand for quick support & development. When we waited for so long, we needed to build it ourselves.
2. 32.▲
   by bit_4l 9y ago

   TablePlus supports both...
3. 33.▲
   by bit_4l 9y ago

   tl;dr: visit https://tableplus.io and see for yourself
4. 34.▲
   by bit_4l 9y ago

   Lovely, thanks!
5. 35.▲
   by bit_4l 9y ago

   It's on the roadmap and will be rolled out soon.
6. 36.▲
   by bit_4l 9y ago

   Because Linux has too many distros. We didn't decide to use Gnome or C/C++ to build the interface. Since the team is very small, we have to focus on our best.
7. 37.▲
   by bit_4l 9y ago

   Thanks! If you want to request any new features, drop us a message on Github https://github.com/TablePlus/TablePlus
8. 38.▲
   by bit_4l 9y ago

   and I love making you a customer :D
9. 39.▲
   by bit_4l 9y ago

   We planned to release a Windows version in Jan 2018. Unfortunately, we got trouble with Swift compiler on Windows (not officially supported, only Linux and Unix). We decided not to wait for Swift and rebuild all the whole thing in C/C#
10. 40.▲
    by bit_4l 9y ago

    Yes, it's like a piece of cake
11. 41.▲
    by bit_4l 9y ago

    take start-up time for example. I'm not sure about DBeaver but Navicat takes 6 seconds, TablePlus takes 0.5 seconds
12. 42.▲
    Show HN: TablePlus – A macOS client for relational databases(medium.com)

    333 points by bit_4l 9y ago|155 comments