biorach

11 ms·

151.
by biorach 2y ago
No, the person you were replying to was advocating for the intersection of ubiquitous features. C++ seems to be aiming for the union.
152.
by biorach 2y ago
Come on, that's not what they're talking about at all.
153.
by biorach 2y ago
I don't see the need to ascribe anything to an agenda. This is an article for popular consumption. They are focusing on the exciting bits (the gladiator stuff) and skimping on the wider cultural background. All pretty standard for popu
154.
by biorach 2y ago
was that as insane as it sounds?
155.
Funding restored for man-page maintenance(lwn.net)
105 points by biorach 2y ago|63 comments
156.
by biorach 2y ago
Man pages maintainer Alejandro Colomar announced in September that he was suspending his work due to a lack of support. He has now let it be known that funding has been found for the next year at least
157.
by biorach 2y ago
in fairness I think the burden of proof is on whoever is claiming the brita lead filter is safe
158.
by biorach 2y ago
> That said, an estimated 4.5-12% of California land burned annually prior to the Spanish getting here What's the source for that? It sounds insanely high - enough to burn the entire land area of California every decade or two if th
159.
by biorach 2y ago
In fairness, this is a response to a need which became common only relatively recently
160.
by biorach 2y ago
well it's more of a metric than you've provided
161.
by biorach 2y ago
> None of them get any usage. Github stats show some uptake so clearly someone finds them useful
162.
by biorach 2y ago
> It will either paste an older copy or not paste anything even though I just hit Ctrl+C (sometimes multiple times) within Calc. Weird. I've used Calc extensively on Windows and Linux and have never come across this
163.
by biorach 2y ago
> For them the risk of career sabotage vs a change of improved quality of life might be worth considering The risk is way too high
164.
by biorach 2y ago
> maximum matching over a graph (edmond's blossom algorithm) Ruby/Rails has this?
165.
by biorach 2y ago
> you are just saving money in launch time but spending more on servers. But... That's kind of the whole point
166.
by biorach 2y ago
Yes, it's just controversial topics. And yes, you're missing the cultural context. Which probably isn't worth your while learning about.
167.
by biorach 2y ago
downvoted, but just for idiocy
168.
by biorach 2y ago
> So it is very frustrating to see the discourse focused on inaccurate statements about async Rust > No, ajross is very confidently making false descriptions of how async Rust and io-using operate. This website favors people who sound
169.
by biorach 2y ago
> has argued endlessly with those who don't like the tradeoffs but only have a surface level understanding of the problem But that's really not what's going on here. ajross has an understanding of the fundamentals of async
170.
by biorach 2y ago
> Again you are wrong. A forum full of people who just like to hear themselves talk. I guess it makes you feel good in some way? I think you're being unduly harsh here. There are a variety of voices here, of various levels of expert
171.
by biorach 2y ago
> The ban of US pesticides is to stifle American infiltration of EU agriculture, and basically every other law can be viewed under this lens. You really really need to cite some sources for this
172.
by biorach 2y ago
This is glib stereotypical nonsense and quite at odds with the reality of the debates currently going on in Ireland
173.
by biorach 2y ago
> Sheep seem to be the big problem. They will grind vegetation down to nothing. If trees are cut down and sheep brought in, the land stabilizes as overgrazed pasture. Then it won't support many sheep, but what it will support will k
174.
by biorach 2y ago
"vague" is an accurate description of your comment. You can get as defensive as you want but you're just adding more noise
175.
by biorach 2y ago
> iirc, based on what I've read earlier. i could be wrong, but don't have time to check it now. Please, if all you've got is a vague recollection of stuff you read ages ago just don't comment at all. You're just
176.
by biorach 2y ago
Wild accusations without any backup... please don't.
177.
by biorach 2y ago
> but isn’t there something depressing about this? Like, faced with an interesting anomaly out there in the world, we have to resort to tweaking the model of dark matter that is already an invention to fit observational anomalies This i
178.
by biorach 2y ago
I imagine the author assumed a technical audience wouldn't need to be told of the necessity of a reverse proxy in front of the wsgi server
179.
by biorach 2y ago
> I certainly hope you're not so naive There is absolutely no need to take this tone, especially seeing as the person you are replying to is clearly in good faith.
180.
by biorach 2y ago
Nice, thank you

More ›