Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bioemerl
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
63 ms
·
661.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
> though a helicopter would do just as well It's very very easy to be cheaper than a helicopter. Drones can require zero or minimal labor, move fast, and run on electricity. If we can have them carry a decent weight and have good r
662.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
To sum up the weird way that we all watch a ton of porn but don't talk about it, sex spreads disease and risks childbirth. Reading doesn't. Because it is so dangerous it becomes a taboo thing, it can't be public and widesprea
663.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
I just read the first few paragraphs of this article before I stopped, but my very first instinct reading this is that it feels a lot like old me. Disdain for basic human things is not a great sign. Eating food and enjoying food is not prim
664.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
I'm honestly amazed that out of the top million sites, which probably includes a ton of tiny tiny sites that are idle or abandoned, only ten percent are offline.
665.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
It'll eventually collapse under its own weight like Atari in the 80s.
666.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
I am confused, nothing in this video seemed to address what I was talking about. Is there one of these points that you think is relevant?
667.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
Ants aren't humans. They do not share, condense, or process information. If you look at the limiter of human advancement you find that single points of high computational power aren't limiting us. Instead, it is human ability to
668.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
We are not limited by either of those things. Sure, single individuals might be, but we aren't single individuals, we are a group. As a group, most of our advances actually come from individual going out and experimenting and having
669.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
I think fears of that are incredibly incredibly overblown. You're going to have to show pretty conclusively quite a few assumptions to be true before I'd be willing to be scared of it. It's kind of the computer science equiva
670.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
I have actually never seen that one. It was before my time, or I was five at the time of release.
671.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
Some sort of robot body, lots of books, and a lawyer to handle questions of property ownership or to establish a trust that's beholden to the AGI instead of me, in my name. Let the AGI do whatever the heck it wants and see what happens
672.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
You really just have to follow the trend of human energy use, eventually we're going to get to a point that planetary scale changes are within our reach, and eventually they'll be easy. Technically we're already changing the
673.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
An inevitable step in human progress is to seize control of the planet's climate for ourselves. We should not accept that the world will change around us, we should make the world fit our interests. On a time scale at which the world
674.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
This is part of the reason I'd be all right to move to something that relies on the JDK. I had heard this before when people were talking about how c sharp has gone open source.
675.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
I have heard it's catching up with C#, but the implementation in that link where you have a person model and you have to write a function just to get/set a string turns me away. That said, there's actually some interesting st
676.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
Google is another one of those companies that controls people with whatever power you give them. I don't want to be reliant on them as much as I don't want to be reliant on Microsoft. I'm sure their engineers are great, as i
677.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
I guess I should say I don't want to code in a purely dynamic language, and because of that it is reliant on TypeScript. I don't want to use JS without types. You 100% can do that, I just don't want to.
678.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
Unless I'm wrong, my understanding is that Java is just kind of a bad language. What makes C# great is how heavily it has leaned towards functional programming. Java, As far as I understand, is still very object-oriented and very clums
679.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
As someone who there's a lot of programming with C# and loves it, are there any good alternatives? This plus the stuff they're doing with Minecraft recently has me very much wanting to get away from them. They've made it cl
680.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
Horrible is the wrong word. It's like meeting someone and they stink. In my experience the people who consistently fail to draw these lines also tend to end up being some sort of toxic to you and or your friend group and or your compa
681.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
The wiki says it was replaced by a tool that kicks on for everyone under 13 that only lets them use words from a very specific whitelist. If they don't do this already they need to divide the player bases. Want to play in the <13 r
682.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
Anyone is fine to share porn online. Just make a spare account and have some shame about it. When it's part of your public persona is when it's a problem. Unless it's literally of you, then things get a lot more complicated.
683.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
If your incompetence continually makes you money you aren't incompetent, you're malicious. Courtesy of Louis Rossman, possibly stealing the quote, speaking about governments screwing up their fines and regulations.
684.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
I feel like this article underplays that there are many other factors effecting autocratic States like China and Russia. Russia, for example, simply isn't a high tech nation. I never expected them to be good at AI. China's zero
685.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
This, assuming it applies to the open source dev teams as well, just makes the windows store less worth using. The option to buy a convenient copy of krita from the store while also supporting the devs was amazing. So, now it's just a
686.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
Something that worries me, if someone cracks our current encryption using quantum computers couldn't they be logging everything we say right now and everything we say right now is actually unsecure to someone 10 years in the future?
687.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
Something that is long lasting can be a bit dated by the time it's ten years old, given how fast tech can move.
688.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
Aside from this place, are there any good alternatives to that website? Everything else I see is either dead, or incredibly political to a degree that I do not want to be involved with it.
689.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
Redesigning reduces, or can reduce, waste, cost, and risk.
690.
▲
by
bioemerl
4y ago
Might be comparing different metrics. If it's lifetime costs you have to cover replacement timelines for lithium degradation, facilities, and so on. Lots of electronics involved when you have banks of thousands of batteries
More ›