Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bhauer
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
49 ms
·
481.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
Remember all of the data Winamp2 used to gather and send to third-party servers?
482.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
Putting aside the stub applications that are promoting other products (e.g., "Get Office"), the Trump photo is just the News app showing a live tile view of the top story for the moment. Yes, the promotional app stubs are advertis
483.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
I knew I had made a good decision to read this when I got to the line, "Mayahuel was not a cactus either." I wonder where this Frank Smith is writing now.
484.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
I worry about the near future where cell connectivity (ala Kindle Whispernet) is cheap enough for these companies to not even bother using your network to exfiltrate data.
485.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
I appreciate the article's message of simplicity. But still its recommendations go beyond what I find necessary. I just use a microfiber cloth with or without a tiny amount of water and my laptop (an original Surface Book) cleans up
486.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
There needs to be a renaissance of non-glossy (matte) screens, for the sake of the eyesight of us all.
487.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
Yep, it's a bit of verbal color to add emphasis to a statement. Much like declaring things that are actually quite ordinary and did not fill you with awe but are otherwise positive as "awesome."
488.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
> While nobody likes excessive animation, it is very important to let the user know their input was received. It's why the cursor changes on mouseover. It's how you know if the app is crashed, or merely processing something yo
489.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
> I also find the ripple effect[1] when pressing things to be infuriating. Just do the action I've asked, don't do this animation and delay the action by half a second. Again, this is somewhat irrational, but it still bothers
490.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
Interesting. The Surface products (e.g., the Surface Book) use glass on metal.
491.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
I woke up a bit late today because I figured the other 14 million in Los Angeles and San Diego had today's farming chores covered.
492.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
We use the word "framework" as a term of convenience covering the full spectrum from platforms, micro-frameworks, to full-stack frameworks. We are also liberal with accepting contributions from the community, which means we do in
493.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
I like that idea. I'll see what we can do!
494.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
Yes! We accept PRs from the community at the GitHub repository [1]. We do ask that you submit what you believe is production quality code that would be suitable to run a real web application. We are liberal with how that is interpreted
495.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
Yes! In fact, I just responded to a similar question over at the Rust Subreddit thread about the same topic. We do in fact capture dstat data while executing the tests but as of today do not render these in any way. You can find raw CSV o
496.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
> How different are the various frameworks here? Quite different. We have included test implementations for frameworks that span 26 computer languages. There are an infinite variety of opinions about how to do things in computer prog
497.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
The best resource to answer your questions is the Requirements for the various test types [1]. But in brief: * Yes, Fortunes is named after the Unix tool of the same name. In our case, it's a test that executes a query of all rows in
498.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
> ( Or was that a joke I am not getting ) Yes, that was a bit of a joke in the blog entry. We suspected for years Docker would be a good fit for this project. Only within the past months did we find the time necessary to convert the
499.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
I wrote the blog entry for this round [1], and I would agree with ksec (elsewhere in these comments) in recommending that readers start there since it includes the highlights of this round. I apologize ahead of time for my humor. It's
500.
▲
TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks Round 16: The Great Dockening
(techempower.com)
6 points
by
bhauer
8y ago
|
0 comments
501.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
I am not surprised. What we think of today when we say "tablet" is a first-class computing device and I am of the opinion few people want a plurality of such devices in their life. This is due to what I call the "yet anothe
502.
▲
Meet Surface Hub 2
(blogs.windows.com)
4 points
by
bhauer
8y ago
|
0 comments
503.
▲
by
bhauer
8y ago
My own music collection, which is composed of many genres including a large helping of progressive rock and electronic music, especially chiptune-style.
504.
▲
by
bhauer
9y ago
Agreed. I am no fan of Zuckerberg and do not use Facebook, but this seems like a non-issue from my point of view. Perhaps it would have been more palatable if phrased as "People over countries," which is a maxim I may myself use
505.
▲
by
bhauer
9y ago
I think many or most anti-tax people do indeed favor proposals that simplify the process of paying taxes. I wouldn't call myself "anti-tax," but I definitely prefer to pay lower taxes, and as few flavors of tax as possible, s
506.
▲
by
bhauer
9y ago
> In 2002, the most common resolutions were 4:3, not 16:9, not only because notebooks were not mainstream yet. Sure. I didn't really intend to get into fine-grained technical details, but yes, back then 4:3 was the predominant as
507.
▲
by
bhauer
9y ago
> (or a laptop more than, say, new or used for $750). To me, the hardware report shows technology is quite stagnant on display resolution and memory. 1366x768 is a resolution from 2002 or thereabouts. 4GB was common in desktop comput
508.
▲
by
bhauer
9y ago
Yeah, but that link is a Firefox hardware report. How many Firefox users are on Chromebooks?
509.
▲
by
bhauer
9y ago
That hardware report is surprising to me in many ways. * In 2018, the most popular resolution for users of Firefox is still 1366x768. And only 1920x1080 is making any headway against the dominance of 1366x768. As much as I am surrounded
510.
▲
by
bhauer
9y ago
I agree with you on the technical merit (or lack thereof) of illustrating the magnitude with colorful metaphors. However, a counter point: I feel it is useful and helpful to our cause to have authors such as this creating those colorful m
More ›