bhartzer

18 ms·

181.
by bhartzer 5y ago
The only way to "fix" it is to figure out where in the Knowledge Graph the data is coming from. The KG is made up of hundreds of sites that contribute to the Knowledge Graph. Find where the bad data is, and get that site to update
182.
by bhartzer 5y ago
This is data from the Knowledge Graph, which is not "owned" by Google. The KG is not Google data, it's shared data amongst several search engines. The claiming is an option given to entities as a courtesy. If they claim the K
183.
by bhartzer 5y ago
Andrea, I know personally how frustrating this can be. I've dealt with something similar with a relative's Knowledge Panel, and dealt with this over and over with multiple people who've asked me to help them fix and update th
184.
by bhartzer 5y ago
For selling domains uiu can list them on afternic or sedo. But if you don’t want to wait to sell, just list on nameliquidate, the Reverse auction for domains.
185.
by bhartzer 5y ago
Look up the owner using Whois. There has to be a valid email address that goes to the owner. Even if it’s under privacy it must still work. Emails that don’t work is invalid whois and can be reported to icann. Registrar has to investigate f
186.
Amazon posted a crypto job. Bitcoin surged 14%(cnn.com)
4 points by bhartzer 5y ago|1 comments
187.
by bhartzer 5y ago
Do any of the audits ever include a risk assessment of the company's domain names and how they're being used? And how they're set up?
188.
Freedom Phone: Completely. Uncensored(freedomphone.com)
4 points by bhartzer 5y ago|1 comments
189.
DNS Attacks on the Rise in APAC(computerweekly.com)
1 points by bhartzer 5y ago|0 comments
190.
by bhartzer 5y ago
Since this is now the top spot here on H/N I suspect it just got the attention of some Googlers who I’m sure will review it. They may not give the site a manual action, though. They’d rather tweak the algorithm so it naturally doesn’t
191.
by bhartzer 5y ago
I agree, we aren’t seeing as much implementation of dnssec, and a lot of other checks that when check the DNP Scores of domains. I recently ran the DNP Scores of all domains of companies in the Fortune 500 and only about 8 percent had high
192.
by bhartzer 5y ago
I haven’t seen any security teams recommend against implementing dnssec. Interesting to see info about the failures, though. Thanks for pointing that out. I’ve been running a ton of sites on domains with dnssec enabled and haven’t had any i
193.
by bhartzer 5y ago
I can tell you which ones not to use based on which registrars have had domain names stolen frequently.
194.
by bhartzer 5y ago
Just because virtually none of the best-regarded security teams haven’t implemented yet doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t implement it. Honestly, I thinks it’s a case that most people don’t know about it, so they don’t know to implement it. T
195.
by bhartzer 5y ago
I don’t see any mention of domain names. Domain names should be set up properly, like implementing dnssec, dmarc, dkim, spf, and using a secure registrar. So many overlook domain security.
196.
Dmarc status of the world’s top banks(dmarcian.com)
1 points by bhartzer 5y ago|0 comments
197.
Fiserv Forgets to Buy Domain It Used as System Default(threatpost.com)
2 points by bhartzer 5y ago|0 comments
198.
Avoid Being a Headline: Not All Domain Registrars Are Created Equal(infosecurity-magazine.com)
2 points by bhartzer 5y ago|0 comments
199.
by bhartzer 5y ago
Official statement from Google's John Mueller regarding this: https://twitter.com/JohnMu/status/1389322980547833856 "No, it's not the case that we penalize for Google Analytics. We don't specia
200.
by bhartzer 5y ago
Google doesn't penalize sites in any way if you're using their products (like GA or embedding a YouTube video). This is just silly and flat out wrong to say that Google penalizes you for using Google Analytics. It's flat-out
201.
by bhartzer 6y ago
I'd like to clarify a few things here. I work for a domain name protection and domain name recovery service (we recover stolen domain names and protect them from getting stolen). The "DNS" was not stolen, the DNS is something
202.
93 Percent of Fortune 500 Have Domains with Security Risks(securitymagazine.com)
1 points by bhartzer 6y ago|0 comments
203.
Squarespace forgot to renew their Squarespace(twitter.com)
33 points by bhartzer 6y ago|3 comments
204.
Real-Time Emoji Tracker(emojitracker.com)
1 points by bhartzer 6y ago|0 comments
205.
Dot-Com or Bust: Why Nobody Cares About Your Domain Name Extension(cmswire.com)
2 points by bhartzer 6y ago|0 comments
206.
Google's Search Monopoly Harms People(twitter.com)
3 points by bhartzer 6y ago|0 comments
207.
Extortionist Journalist Picks a Fight(geoffolson.com)
1 points by bhartzer 6y ago|0 comments
208.
by bhartzer 6y ago
What actually happened is that a bunch of domain names were stolen at network solutions. Many of which start with the letter P. Perl was just one of them. We probably will never know how it was done, as network solutions won’t say, and they
209.
by bhartzer 6y ago
Nah, ransom is not usually the goal by domain thieves. They steal them to make a quick buck by reselling them.
210.
by bhartzer 6y ago
I don’t think it’s really an attack on the domain Perl.com. Rather, Perl was just one of the domains stolen at the same time as others. I’m aware of at least half a dozen or so domains that were stolen at the same time, by the same domain t

More ›