bhartzer

35 ms·

361.
by bhartzer 8y ago
Yes, you do need to hire a good domain attorney that is well versed in tld applications. Last time I considered a new tld you are looking at about $500k in total costs, such as application, atty fees, and marketing fees. That’s if it doesn’
362.
by bhartzer 8y ago
Most likely the registry won’t let you buy trademarked domains if you can’t prove you have the trademark. There is a period set aside for tm holders. I would stay far away from any brand or tm domains at any time. You will eventually lose t
363.
by bhartzer 8y ago
You can get multiple domains if you can justify it.
364.
Edit My Ex – Remove Your Ex from Your Photos(editmyex.com)
11 points by bhartzer 8y ago|9 comments
365.
Wix ‘SEO Wiz’ Stars in Big Super Bowl Ad, Fumbles with SEO Community(searchenginejournal.com)
1 points by bhartzer 8y ago|0 comments
366.
A New Domain Authority Is Coming Soon: What’s Changing, When, and Why(moz.com)
2 points by bhartzer 8y ago|0 comments
367.
by bhartzer 8y ago
The biggest problem nowadays, though, is that we're building sites more and more that aren't crawlable by the search engines. Basic site structure and usability issues plague many sites. A good SEO will fix those issues. It's
368.
by bhartzer 8y ago
If those domains actually had content on them and are still live sites, then yes, it could be worth keeping. As long as you keep the site(s) live. But just because a domain name is 10-12 years old, if it never had content and links, doesn&#
369.
by bhartzer 8y ago
Mass distribution of press releases became an outdated, spammy technique about 5 years ago. Not considered white hat by any stretch of anyone's imagination.
370.
by bhartzer 8y ago
>> carefully reading the google documents which return when you do the obvious searches on how to improve SEO are very clear: do some structural work, be very clear about your sites underlying page relations, proffer keywords which co
371.
by bhartzer 8y ago
When you moved to HTTPs, and the site tanked, then most likely it's due to a bad HTTP/HTTPs migration. I see that all the time, and there's a lot more involved to migrating to HTTPs then you'd think. The biggest problem
372.
by bhartzer 8y ago
If you're an "SEO guy" you should know that any SEO techniques that clearly violate Google's Webmaster Guidelines are not "white hat SEO". For example, specifically take a look at the line that says, "Link
373.
Inspect URLs for Google Search Console Accounts You Don’t Have Access To(ohgm.co.uk)
1 points by bhartzer 8y ago|0 comments
374.
by bhartzer 8y ago
We have the same issue here in North Texas... apparently because of centurylink. The sheriffs office is blaming centurylink.
375.
Lessons Learned from Teaching Professionals about DevOps in New Zealand(allengeer.com)
2 points by bhartzer 8y ago|0 comments
376.
by bhartzer 8y ago
It would definitely be a tough project--but here in the USA we have PACER, so in theory it could be done. I'm not sure about New Zealand, though.
377.
by bhartzer 8y ago
>>Google's claim is that they were not notified of the granted name suppression Yes, that's correct. But Google's policy, as far as I know, is that they publish the information and then, if presented with a court order,
378.
Google Illegally Revealed Murder Suspect's Name via Mass Email(bbc.com)
10 points by bhartzer 8y ago|5 comments
379.
If You Can't Build a Bot Then Fake It(theguardian.com)
5 points by bhartzer 8y ago|0 comments
380.
Distraught Mom Letter to Amazon Claims Daughter Alexa Is Constantly Bullied(nbcnewyork.com)
4 points by bhartzer 8y ago|3 comments
381.
by bhartzer 8y ago
It comes down to management. Management needs to understand how SEO/Marketing/Digital Marketing works and they need to know how to scale it properly. It takes a lot of internal training and knowledge of that industry. There are a
382.
Ensuring Your Domain Migration Goes Smoothly(oncrawl.com)
4 points by bhartzer 8y ago|0 comments
383.
by bhartzer 8y ago
This from employees of the company that argued (successfully) in a United States court that no one has a reasonable expectation of privacy when connecting to any Google service. Sorry, Googlers, you need to get your priorities straight.
384.
by bhartzer 8y ago
There's so much wrong with this report, it can be confusing to many people. For example, some of what they're calling "SEO" really has nothing to do with SEO. It should be checking: - if the page is crawlable - if there
385.
by bhartzer 8y ago
As we move towards using more not-COMs and “dot whatevers”, right now it’s actually better to use a www since many non-technical people may not know that alphabet.xyz is a domain name. So in any offline marketing I’d definitely add www to t
386.
by bhartzer 8y ago
>> At least in the early 2000s having a page on a high authority(however you define it) domain automatically guaranteed higher rankings. I totally agree. And in all of those cases, the page that is on that "high authority domain&
387.
by bhartzer 8y ago
Actually, it's never been "a thing". Domain Authority is just a concept that was created by Moz--a metric. This is an interesting read: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/domain-authority/246515/ &
388.
by bhartzer 8y ago
That's what we would like to believe, but the concept of domain authority doesn't exist. (Just because a page is on a certain domain name it should rank... is false). I'd put my bet on links (that are hidden), link ghosting,
389.
by bhartzer 8y ago
The concept of domain authority has been proven, time and time again, that domain authority just doesn't exist. Here's a recent explanation: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/domain-authority/246515/
390.
by bhartzer 8y ago
This is just pointing out a site that's ranking--the title of the post doesn't go with the content of the post. The "how" isn't revealed. Regardless, most likely there are links involved, and there actually be canon

More ›