bengale

22 ms·

241.
by bengale 5y ago
It also massively reduces the value for thieves since even the parts become worthless.
242.
by bengale 5y ago
Yeah that all sounds very familiar.
243.
by bengale 5y ago
At the last large traditional place I was at it seemed a lot like the upper management types had put these gatekeepers in place so they had people that would pander to them. The amount of times one of them told me they couldn't tell th
244.
by bengale 5y ago
Isn’t this largely the point of gmail? It’s a data collection tool isn’t it?
245.
by bengale 5y ago
My solution for this is a headless Linux box under my desk and remote vscode and ssh from my MacBook. Best of both worlds so far for me. I did try and use Linux full time but the UI drove me up the wall so I’m back comfortable in macOS but
246.
by bengale 5y ago
This generally my take on this too. When I see posts like this I’m never sure if I’m envious of the free time to faff about like this, or have pity that they have nothing better to do.
247.
by bengale 5y ago
Yes, for the upgraded plans you can export data from all private channels and direct messages. It also doesn't notify users when this happens. You can't watch the chats in real time or anything. People should assume communication
248.
by bengale 5y ago
Yeah, we saw the real start of our growth when we hired a dedicated sales and marketing person. They didn’t take any equity and they weren’t even that expensive (ignoring commission). I’m not sure it would have made sense to bring them on a
249.
by bengale 5y ago
Alfred seems live fine alongside spotlight too.
250.
by bengale 5y ago
Yeah but I know its more of a nostalgia thing. I wouldn't trade my iPhone for one, but I would love them to have been able to exist side by side.
251.
by bengale 5y ago
I’m not sure if it’s something I want to get into but I don’t really agree. All I was saying is a policy supported by a large majority, proposed by this government, had to be walked back because of their inability to control the back benche
252.
by bengale 5y ago
Just goes to show how weak this current government is. Polls show 60% approve of the idea, with 27% opposed. Yet they still can't get their own policy done due to infighting in the tory party.
253.
by bengale 5y ago
I have my hottub at 40C which is hot when you get in but comfortable to sit in for a while.
254.
by bengale 5y ago
I'm surprised Ray-Ban were willing to attach their brand to this.
255.
by bengale 5y ago
I would assume you'd also need to have some sort of armed forces too, otherwise whichever country wants you data can sail over with their Navy and take it.
256.
by bengale 5y ago
I've yet to hear a good argument for them.
257.
by bengale 5y ago
Why would it seem likely that our bodies have a way to deal with a man made substance?
258.
by bengale 5y ago
6 years in the UK.
259.
by bengale 5y ago
I hope this means they wont renew their agreement with Sky in the UK when that expires. I don’t want a Sky subscription but would like to sign up for HBO max over here.
260.
by bengale 5y ago
I feel we're circling the same issues here so I'll leave it after this. But what you're saying is the point I'm making, many clouds have been doing this for a decade and we've not seen the issues you're worried
261.
by bengale 5y ago
It's not an example though. Putting aside a lack of news report we'll assume it's true, it's got nothing to do with cloud scanning for images. A picture of someones children wouldn't trigger these systems at all.
262.
by bengale 5y ago
Ok so your fear is someone will target your grandparents with child porn? If this was such a major problem why has no-one been targeted like this in the last decade when everyone else was scanning for it?
263.
by bengale 5y ago
> So someone might forward you your personal pics from your meeting with them and its pixels might get edited by the messenger app you use to save the picture into your photos to specifically collide its hash with a csam image, while to
264.
by bengale 5y ago
But they won't be my private photos, the only way it gets to the point where a human see's them is that I have a bunch of child porn uploaded into iCloud, or someone puts a bunch of these grey blob images into my library. Neither
265.
by bengale 5y ago
I don't think they will. They already scan it all in the cloud, and the benefit of doing it on device is for user privacy, that's not something google gives a shit about.
266.
by bengale 5y ago
Yeah I can't decide on this one. Part of me thinks this can't be happening, and that someone would have realised. But there's been a couple of occasions that go beyond the "creepy coincidence" ads to something that
267.
by bengale 5y ago
I don't understand why this is a concern. Someone would need 30 or so child porn images to generate these. Then they'd need to create these grey blobs and send them to the target. The target would need to save them in their photo
268.
by bengale 5y ago
It would need to have 30 collisions before anything even took place, which realistically isn't going to happen.
269.
by bengale 5y ago
Oh I see. Yeah we use google mail for our business and I use fast mail, both with custom domains.
270.
by bengale 5y ago
No they are different things. CSAM detection is looking for specific images from a database before upload to iCloud photo library: https://www.apple.com/child-safety/pdf/CSAM_Detection_Techni... The child protecti

More ›