Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
benbjohnson
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
38 ms
·
391.
▲
by
benbjohnson
15y ago
I'm not sure why everyone is surprised. Adobe has just come out with a slew of new HTML5 products (Muse, Edge) and they already have Dreamweaver which is typically used for HTML editing. Adobe doesn't have a strong future with Flash but the
392.
▲
by
benbjohnson
15y ago
It's amazing that a format with a formal specification can be so poorly thought out.
393.
▲
by
benbjohnson
16y ago
Thanks for following! As for the platform, Grapevine is a modular platform that will pull in messages, group them into topics and then periodically send out a notification for the most popular topic. Topics are limited by a window so topics
394.
▲
Show HN: Trending GitHub Repos by Language with Grapevine
6 points
by
benbjohnson
16y ago
|
4 comments
395.
▲
by
benbjohnson
16y ago
I'd like to add something to your list: Adding an entirely new vocabulary to learn. Velocity, story points, etc. I don't mind learning new things but most of these terms are just the repackaging of existing ideas.
396.
▲
by
benbjohnson
16y ago
I actually wasn't involved in much open source in the past but I've been contributing something nearly every day for the past couple of months because of GitHub. Another great contribution from GitHub is the way it's founders help push bett
397.
▲
Standalone GitHub Wiki Hosting with Smeagol
(smeagolrb.info)
1 points
by
benbjohnson
16y ago
|
0 comments
398.
▲
by
benbjohnson
16y ago
That's awesome how it shows the comments and code side-by-side. The only downside is that I have to describe the functionality while I'm writing code instead of beforehand. Thanks, adorton.
399.
▲
by
benbjohnson
16y ago
I have a couple issues with Steak: 1. It seems to take something that's already pretty straightfoward (RSpec) and just adds a couple keywords. 2. You're writing code when you should be describing features. Trying to remember where to put an
400.
▲
by
benbjohnson
16y ago
I would love to see some way to relate test cases with sections of the README. That way you could see code coverage of your README. It's difficult to retroactively write a README after you've written your code but it can also be difficult t