benatkin

47 ms·

781.
by benatkin 2y ago
Indeed, it does deal with the message loss. I was momentarily confused because in my many thousands of bullet chess games on Lichess I haven't had much of any message loss that can be attributed to Lichess's servers (but plenty wh
782.
by benatkin 2y ago
Outline is used for :focus and :focus-visible, so box-shadow is nice to have for hover so you don't have to repurpose the outline for it.
783.
Writing WordPress Posts in Vim(stevenjaycohen.com)
2 points by benatkin 2y ago|0 comments
784.
The Lean Dating Manifesto(pixelmetry.com)
3 points by benatkin 2y ago|3 comments
785.
by benatkin 2y ago
> requires the use of RPC That's gRPC, which luckily isn't the kind of RPC that a lot of computer scientists don't like, just like the Object Oriented Programming in Rust isn't the kind of OOP that a lot of computer s
786.
by benatkin 2y ago
> I'm not judging "open source leaders" more harshly On purpose, no. But it's a question of interest. People seem to have a lot of interest in going after open source tech leaders that they don't have for going a
787.
by benatkin 2y ago
That's LibreWolf.
788.
by benatkin 2y ago
I wouldn’t be surprised if that hash fragment is sent to URL previews in otherwise encrypted chats. I did that too in my own program and it felt wrong. https://codeberg.org/macchiato/encshare-app I think I’ll change it
789.
by benatkin 2y ago
I see a pattern of open source leaders being judged more harshly than proprietary software leaders. I think it’s because of a feedback loop. It started before the current crop of social media. People saw they could criticize Theo de Raadt m
790.
by benatkin 2y ago
Ubuntu patches all the time. WordPress could have done exactly the same with patches! Good idea. Sometimes a patch isn’t enough so there is something like SilverWolf. That’s kinda like ACF/SCF.
791.
by benatkin 2y ago
I’ll use npm as an example. When someone not at npm runs npm publish, their npm client sends a request for their package to be published, which to me shows that the person isn’t the publisher because they aren’t requesting for themselves to
792.
by benatkin 2y ago
wordpress.org isn’t an intermediary, they’re the publisher, so they can’t be in the middle, and they can’t be MITM Now, the owner of a package could do a supply chain attack (with a very short chain which is why I think the concept is overh
793.
by benatkin 2y ago
It could incidentally be closed source, then. I stand corrected. Sometimes devs & teams of devs wait until their code is finished to put it online. I tend not to – most of my unfinished code open source code is online. I understand the
794.
by benatkin 2y ago
> The wordpress foundation (and wordpress.org) is not independent enough from Matt & Automattic I see people call for this, and I'd like to see that energy used to call for antitrust against Facebook, which grew at the same time
795.
by benatkin 2y ago
> Automattic is an irrational actor They're more human than the WP Engines of the world, though.
796.
by benatkin 2y ago
I don't see it catching on that this is a "supply-chain attack" (from the article, but what came to mind when you said that it seems pretty damning). It isn't an attack because it's done deliberately by the owner (y
797.
by benatkin 2y ago
The title heavily implies that Mozilla's is closed-source. It isn't: https://github.com/mozilla/send Actually since it says forked it implies that Mozilla maintains a closed-source version. No, it was cancell
798.
by benatkin 2y ago
Nice detailed article. However, in these two places it doesn't seem clear that it was just the Slack account that was deactivated. Here: > Javier Casares shared that his account was deactivated after he asked a series of questions i
799.
by benatkin 2y ago
We never had the code actually. That code is of no use to me without a proper license.
800.
MicroPython Playground in WebAssembly Unicorn.js CPU Emulator(micropython.org)
3 points by benatkin 2y ago|0 comments
801.
Compiling Bigloo Scheme to WebAssembly(blogs.igalia.com)
15 points by benatkin 2y ago|0 comments
802.
Awesome Container Tinkering(github.com)
8 points by benatkin 2y ago|0 comments
803.
by benatkin 2y ago
I disagree, which is why I left my comment. The bytes didn't disappear in a way that justifies the headline on HN IMHO because there was a very clear explanation of where they went.
804.
by benatkin 2y ago
This is clickbait. The process exiting without unflushed output doesn't mean disappearing bytes. The bytes were there but the program left without them.
805.
by benatkin 2y ago
> If they’re willing to do this, I wouldn’t trust any plugins hosted on WordPress.org. I wouldn't be surprised if the original author of ACF trusts WordPress more. His last commit was more than 3 years ago and he hasn't shown u
806.
by benatkin 2y ago
> The abbreviation “WP” is not covered by the WordPress trademarks This goes with my view that Matt is technically correct almost all the time, which is the best kind of correct. https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/90999
807.
by benatkin 2y ago
Ah, I see the point about SSR. Yes, frameworks like React and Vue make it less obvious how to do non-framework SSR. However, they don't make it impossible. You can have React and Vue render on an individual element and not the whole do
808.
by benatkin 2y ago
Here's my quick rebuttal, as someone who likes/uses parts of Web Components but knows it's no panacea. ChatGPT could improve on it I'm sure. > 1. No Need for Node.js: Keeping Development Simple You can have code that
809.
by benatkin 2y ago
From my perspective those are tenths of a cent. Stripe has integer values for cents. Am I wrong here? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35326710/stripe-currency...
810.
by benatkin 2y ago
It was open source for about 10 years. They built themselves a name by being open source. Then they went and changed their license to a non-OSI-approved license. https://blog.sentry.io/relicensing-sentry/ Not everyone

More ›