belter

30 ms·

571.
by belter 1y ago
That comparison collapses instantly. Physics has invariants...Economics does not. You can’t rerun the economy under controlled conditions, so “experiments” are mostly natural or quasi experiments...statistical patchwork with fragile assumpt
572.
What Did He Know?(youtube.com)
5 points by belter 1y ago|0 comments
573.
Stronger Adaptive Attacks Bypass Defenses Against LLM Jailbreaks(arxiv.org)
2 points by belter 1y ago|0 comments
574.
by belter 1y ago
It is not falsifiable because it is not a hypothesis but a framework for recognizing science. Rejecting Popper for that is like rejecting reasoning itself because you can’t run a control experiment on it...but then one turns into an economi
575.
by belter 1y ago
> There is no "engineering" here. Maybe Blahgineering? "The words "blah blah blah" increase AI accuracy" - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45524413
576.
by belter 1y ago
Science is not about where you test hypotheses, but how. Astrophysics builds falsifiable models and checks them against reality like spectra, gravitational waves, etc... When predictions fail, theories change. If these were economists, they
577.
by belter 1y ago
Physics can test those hypotheses under controlled conditions...
578.
by belter 1y ago
They are not pretending to be sciences.
579.
by belter 1y ago
Sorkin Coin: https://youtu.be/26WMF7Xdb0E?t=659
580.
by belter 1y ago
Predictable...but are those aholes wrong...? :-) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44013692 Economics violates Popper demarcation criterion. Economic theories can't be falsified because you can't run controlled
581.
Ross Sorkin on similarities between Wall Street today and 1929's markets(youtube.com)
2 points by belter 1y ago|1 comments
582.
by belter 1y ago
They need their own AI bubble... https://x.com/jasonfurman/status/1971995367202775284
583.
by belter 1y ago
In my village we call those Tesla Coils... https://youtu.be/fLiji1YgDGU
584.
The Thriller Writer Who Took on a Tech Giant(nytimes.com)
1 points by belter 1y ago|1 comments
585.
by belter 1y ago
https://archive.is/w8gYp
586.
by belter 1y ago
Did you look at VSCodium ? https://vscodium.com/
587.
by belter 1y ago
For a while the language will be named PIthon
588.
by belter 1y ago
So the moderator of this Reddit group, has a company who directly competes with Bootcamps. What are Reddit policies on moderators competing commercial interests? Could one person moderate r/azure while working for aws ?
589.
by belter 1y ago
https://archive.is/cmAdY
590.
by belter 1y ago
Another proof only dumb criminals get caught ... "US Court Orders OpenAI to Retain All ChatGPT Conversations, Even Deleted Ones" - https://hackernoon.com/us-court-orders-openai-to-retain-all-...
591.
Jensen Huang says H-1B changes would've prevented his family from immigrating(cnbc.com)
12 points by belter 1y ago|6 comments
592.
Billionaire tech investor says 'valuations in AI are at a bubble'(cnbc.com)
7 points by belter 1y ago|1 comments
593.
New Organic Molecules Found in Old Cassini Data(universetoday.com)
2 points by belter 1y ago|0 comments
594.
by belter 1y ago
I have heard this before, but my experience when working as Consultant, is that Customers will do a lot of diligence before accepting a substitute. Maybe these are Contractors and not Consultants? ;-)
595.
by belter 1y ago
Revenue is flat last three years, profits halved, margins crushed and there will be no profits without the EV credit...Valuation still priced like 2021... Meme stock...
596.
by belter 1y ago
> If you speak with AI researchers, they all seem reasonable in their expectations. An extraordinary claim for which I would like to see the extraordinary evidence. Because every single interview still available on YT form 3 years ago ..
597.
Jeff Bezos says AI is in a bubble but society will get 'gigantic' benefits(cnbc.com)
292 points by belter 1y ago|642 comments
598.
by belter 1y ago
So they are losing money but will make it on volume? :-)
599.
Drone sightings disrupt Munich airport(dw.com)
3 points by belter 1y ago|0 comments
600.
by belter 1y ago
One less principal engineer signing bonus ...:-)

More ›