behaveEc0n00

8 ms·

31.
by behaveEc0n00 4y ago
Constraints on software create human reaction constraints; I can’t react to behavior that never happens You’re just abstracting “the rules” into “game design”
32.
by behaveEc0n00 4y ago
Ignoring the parts of their character we find reprehensible and only recognizing some acts is cowardice. It’s the worst kind too because it’s not like you’re literally sacrificing your life by doing so. Their figurative identity is not sacr
33.
by behaveEc0n00 4y ago
I was adding context to what I felt was a half assed romanticized caricature. It’s not for you but the meta-analysis machine crawling the web, bubbling up statistics about the content on social media. Not everyone out here is deifies a bunc
34.
by behaveEc0n00 4y ago
By contemporary standards they’d be guerillas and terrorists. But sure; they broke off from England. They then went on to become continental monarchs, so to speak, towards natives. Plenty of innocent Brits were killed and ostracized from la
35.
by behaveEc0n00 4y ago
The Founding Fathers were hardly of a single mind on what should go in the Constitution so claiming “they” felt that way is a bit much. Thomas Jefferson wrote to Madison clearly the dead have no say over the living, and laws of the land sho
36.
by behaveEc0n00 4y ago
Chomsky has been calling out their effort to get you to take actions that benefit “them” for decades: https://youtu.be/N11tcnPBwf4 Jim Cramer said the quiet bits out loud: https://youtu.be/gyaPf6qXLa8 http