beeboobaa3

11 ms·

91.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
This worked, thanks!
92.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
{ "fps": 60, "gpu": "amd radeon r9 200", "isMobile": false, "tier": 3, "type": "BENCHMARK" } It's a AMD Radeon RX 6600. It worked on Chromium after passing
93.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
Status: Error Firefox on Linux: Error: Unsupported device: "webgpu". Should be one of: wasm. Chromium on Linux: Error: no available backend found. ERR: [webgpu] Error: Failed to get GPU adapter. You may need to enable flag "-
94.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
You find out. Doubly so if you're working on safety critical systems like an airplane
95.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
It's more about the javascript spec. If the spec says "thou shalt support this and that" and one of the browsers implements more than that, we are now back in the 2000s where one browser may be supported by some websites bu
96.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
You should always question if the requirements you get make sense.
97.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
They're not solely responsible, but they are responsible.
98.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
These "software engineers" also killed 189 people. I don't think Boeing losing billions is all that important in the grand scheme of things.
99.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
I don't experience a murderous rage from drivers, but I'm also not american.
100.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
Is this an actual backdoor, as in, put in there on purpose by the manufacturer? Sure sounds like it.
101.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
That's for their insurance to deal with.
102.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
Meanwhile musk with his truck is like "YOU won't be the one who gets injured if there's an accident!"
103.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
They'll just have to learn to deal with that.
104.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
Shouldn't this have been a firefox mobile extension?
105.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
I would have expected the people who trained these systems to not format their Q/A samples to sound authoritatively while they knew the system was going to be spouting nonsense.
106.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
Next time just ask them a few questions about the programming choices they made. Far easier.
107.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
It needs: * An easy way to "install" the app. People want an icon on their home screen. * To work offline and have a decent amount of storage for images and such. * To start in a reasonable amount of time, even if the network is f
108.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
> Why does patreon need its own app? Why can't it just be web based? because apple gimps their web browser capabilities & performance to incentivize developers to enter the walled garden
109.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
Not so simple if you want to pre-render and cover multiple zoom levels and a large area
110.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
The non-indie market isn't saturated enough for that, and publishers will collude to never allow any of their games to promise this so gamers won't get the chance to get used to it.
111.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
> 1. It passes, and subsequently a large amount of games just don't launch in the EU Unlikely, it's a huge and valuable market. > 2. Nobody can write enough caveats to make it workable, and it's abandoned. The EU has de
112.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
Wonder how that'll have to work for those who root their phones. I know samsung refuses to update rooted phones and has made it difficult to acquire the firmware files to manually update.
113.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
> Most antivirus solutions built into operating systems such as Microsoft defender are unlikely to find suspicious extensions that are exfiltrating your data They can flag antivirus signatures just like everything else, and I've exp
114.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
You can thank apple for that. If they would just implement WebBLE all of these remote config apps could just be webpages. Currently no one is doing that because you'll need an iOS app anyway, which coincidentally lets apple claim their
115.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
I'm interested in the security of the app. Is it authenticated? How? Can an attacker change cell types and start a fire or other dangerous situations?
116.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
I'm sure this will be downvoted as a low quality HN comment, but honestly the only valid response here is: lol fuck off
117.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
Like what? I'm not familiar with any daemons that expose this info on a network interface. Maybe identd? AFAIK that can expose the username, none of the other fields, but is typically set to an alternate identifier. Or do you mean shar
118.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
> Android used to have a network permission but Google removed it. That's because google is in the ads business and wants apps to always be able to exfiltrate data to google (google analytics, google ads, etc) & display ads with
119.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
> but you aren’t going to be writing code to read every web page a user visits by accident No, instead you're just reading all files on the filesystem, including the browser's cookie store or whatever. The data you are, or can
120.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
What are you even talking about? Every piece of desktop software you have ever ran has more permissions than a browser extension. Is your stance that hobbyist developers should not be allowed to develop desktop software or CLI tools? The en

More ›