Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bccdee
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
271.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
Oh, vim's keybindings are fine. But vim is missing LSP, completion, file pickers / fuzzy finding, surround operations, easymotion jumps, and displaying buffers in the tab line. Those need to be added with plugins. That's what
272.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
> And the way out is the same as with vim - just pick someone else who has done it I think the crucial thing here is that most people don't do it, because it works out of the box. You can change any of the keybindings and any of
273.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
> However, DDD has a strong object-oriented core The original 2003 DDD book is very 2003 in that it is mired in object orientation to the point of frequently referencing object databases¹ as a state-of-the-art storage layer. However, t
274.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
I think the "generic core" is often a SQL database or other such generic storage/analytics layer, while the "functional core" is the business logic that operates on the specific domain objects.
275.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
There's nothing procedural about binding return values to variables, so long as you aren't mutating them. Every functional language lets you do that. That's `let ... in` in Haskell.
276.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
Running a website that distributes information is not the same as selling drugs. That's why free speech is a right and free drugs are not. And, yes, there are some types of speech (libel, for instance) that merit special scrutiny. A we
277.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
Real-time GCs can only guarantee a certain number of deallocations per second. Even with a very well-designed GC, there's no free lunch. A system which manages its memory explicitly will not need to risk overloading its GC.
278.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
Human lives often depend on processes that can afford to be quite slow. You can have a real time system requiring only sub-hour latency; the "realness" of a real-time deadline is quite distinct from the duration of that deadline.
279.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
> I didn't consider the change from `std.fs.openFile` to `std.Io.Dir.openFile` to be meaningful, but I guess that is problematic for some reason? Because you explicitly said that existing code would continue to work without `std.I
280.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
Right, but that's option 1 (arrest them if they enter the uk).
281.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
I thought protobuf didn't expose any canonical binary encoding. Who's been using protobuf as a cryptographic protocol primitive?
282.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
> if you change my example to an entirely different one No, it's the same example. You said that, objectively, humans can only survive within certain temperature bands. I said that depends what you mean by "survive." Wheth
283.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
Are math and physics objectively provable? Hollywood celebrity Terrence Howard infamously thinks that 1×1=2. He's a math crackpot—someone with an irrational amateur theory about math or physics. Another famous example is the Time Cub
284.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
Interesting example! What role would you say clothing and housing play in "objective" survival? Humans can survive in space, given a space suit or capsule, and a small contingent of humans live in Antarctica by way of warm clothes
285.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
How do you know they aren't defocused, relative to other comparable private schools? Anyway, when people say screens affect focus, they don't mean that it's an inherent property of LCD displays. They mean the things people do
286.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
That it's being framed as "raising expectations" at all is very silly to me. "Raising expectations" costs nothing and requires no external support, yet we see no success stories about schools which raised expectatio
287.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
If you draw your test sample from private schools and $500/month apps, your conclusions are going to be pretty skewed.
288.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
Scaling to a lot of reads is relatively easy, but you get into weird architectural territory once you hit a certain volume of writes. Anything involving monitoring or real-time event analysis can get hairy. That's when stuff like kafka
289.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
> Yes it advanced extremely quickly The things that impress me about gpt-5 are basically the same ones that impressed me about gpt-3. For all the talk about exponential growth, I feel like we experienced one big technical leap forward an
290.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
> The phrase "traumatically over-X" is extremely rare. There are plenty of "over-x" phrases in English associated with trauma or harm. Do a web search in quotes for "traumatic over{extension/exertion/st
291.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
I don't know. It's a classic LLM-ism. "Traumatically over-X" is probably a common enough phrase. The prmpt says, "I don't know what labs are doing to these poor LLMs during RL," so the model connects that
292.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
> Saying "fuck you" to someone who gave you something amazing for free, because he's not giving you as much as you want for free I don't have a problem, on principle, with paywalling new features. I don't like i
293.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
It also depends what the "most important papers" actually are. What is it that makes something a breakthrough? Suppose I'm analyzing a species of bacteria with some well-known techniques and I discover it produces an enzyme w
294.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
Okay yeah, I broadly agree. I'm not sure we can easily determine the difference between constructive conceptions of victimhood that foster change and reactionary conceptions of victimhood that cement cycles of violence though, especial
295.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
> I don't think four year olds demonstrating the ability to read several levels above their grade level is 1.) rare and 2.) a talent you can realistically tease out from over-parenting at that age. Sure, but shouldn't those kid
296.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
heritable /'hɛrɪtəbəl/ adjective capable of being inherited But if you want to use your definition, that's fine too. I can tell you right now that whether a person has performed in a violin concert can be a
297.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
> You are talking about everything else except the subject: "heritability". Did you miss the part where the kid does not inherit my having performed a violin recital? "Demonstrated abilities" are not heritable, becaus
298.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
> No, it should not. Try to explain why you believe that. Uh, okay. Let's do a thought experiment: Suppose I take some violin lessons and acquire an as-yet-undemonstrated ability to play the instrument. Later, I perform at a violin
299.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
"Demonstrated ability or achievement" is not highly hereditable. The word "demonstrated" should make that obvious. If I learn to play guitar and then have a kid, that kid will not know how to play guitar. Aptitudes may b
300.
▲
by
bccdee
1y ago
> merit is highly hereditable That's a foolish statement on its face. "Merit" quantifies whether someone deserves something, and it depends both on the deserved thing and the rubric for judgment. Some forms of merit are fa
More ›