Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bbstats
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
121.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
None of this is that bad.
122.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
mean crypto utility is basically zero. mean AI utility is decent.
123.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
Very first nerf I ever saw ran fine on consumer hw at 60fps in VR. And gaussian splatting for polycam is on their website now (was frontpage of HN yesterday too)
124.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
So dramatic lol
125.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
Pretty useful if you get a positive though
126.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
because it's incredibly easy to use, and numpy and pandas are written in python.
127.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
past != present
128.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
OTOH true intelligence can still poorly compress things.
129.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
I would say compression has some congruency with intelligence.
130.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
I read it that way! :)
131.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
The point is that it's not pre-existing Linux users.
132.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
I...do not prefer this syntax.
133.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
GPT5?
134.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
Probably dog / chimp, no?
135.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
If you don't have a lot of money this is true. I think the opposite happens if you are rich.
136.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
We have some where I live (Flytrex in Durham). It's a pretty fun and occasionally useful novelty but - FAA regulations mean a driver has to come watch it deliver the food so - not quite ready for prime time.
137.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
These are not problems.
138.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
This remains to be true of the Star Wars trilogy...
139.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
I can't work out my core with my body weight?
140.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
Yes it absolutely was.
141.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
From the article "It’s absolutely ridiculous,” Tzanetos said. “This is a once-in-a-lifetime kind of thing.”
142.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
No
143.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
Seems fine still. I use Poe.
144.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
When you find the minima of your validation curve, rarely if ever is your test loss lower than your training loss. I don't think this necessarily means you're overfitting.
145.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
Yes
146.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
"it's a mouthpad" "you mean mousepad??" "no, MOUTHpad"
147.
▲
by
bbstats
3y ago
seems logical in that you can train on more poses/colors/shapes/angles/lighting conditions. but also we could assume that there's a more direct/elegant improvement than using a generative model?
148.
▲
by
bbstats
4y ago
Calling chatgpt a Markov chain is like calling a weather forecast linear regression.
149.
▲
by
bbstats
4y ago
This is... extremely ugly.
150.
▲
by
bbstats
4y ago
Clickbait headline
More ›