bborud

24 ms·

331.
by bborud 2y ago
I was responding to the following > I guess when it's your censors in power, big government is fine and dandy. Perhaps I misunderstood, but my point was that scientific truth should under no circumstances be subject to political poi
332.
by bborud 2y ago
I think it depends a bit on what markets we're talking about. Multi-material capability is mostly something I see hobbyists use. I rarely see it in an industrial setting. And before people say that Prusa and Bambu printers are for th
333.
by bborud 2y ago
If you are talking about REST here, expect an angry mob outside your door soon. URIs that have inherent structure and meaning? Burn the heretic! :-)
334.
by bborud 2y ago
Have you tried the buf.build tools? Especially the remote code generation and package generation may make life easier for you. a couple of links https://buf.build/protocolbuffers/java?version=v29.3 https://
335.
by bborud 2y ago
I tend to prefer RESTish rather than RESTful since RESTful almost suggests attempting to implement Fielding's ideas but not quite getting there. I think the subset of approaches that try and fail to implement Fielding's ideas is
336.
by bborud 2y ago
One thing that plagues almost all API solutions where you have to generate code is that the vast majority of code generators are bad, and often the code they generate is ugly. I've never understood why so many code generators are so fi
337.
by bborud 2y ago
Since you mention Maven I'm going to make the assumption that you are using Java. I haven't used Java in quite a while. The last 8 years or so I've been programming Go. Your experience of gRPC seems to be very different from
338.
by bborud 2y ago
When I call WASM functions the types I have available to me are i32/64 and f32/64. There are not other options. Not even byte arrays. If I need to pass strings, structs, bytes etc I have to allocate memory inside the WASM instan
339.
by bborud 2y ago
The fascinating thing about JS/TS UI frameworks is that they seem to grow out of a frustration with all the complexity, heaps and heaps of oddball syntax, implicit behaviors and things that need to happen in a particular order or thing
340.
by bborud 2y ago
It would be interesting to know how many people buy printers with AMS or other multi-material capability. How big of a selling point is it really?
341.
by bborud 2y ago
I ThouYS may have a point. It seems to me that Prusa were tempted to go after the prosumer/pro market and invested a lot of time and engineering horsepower into higher spec machines (Prusa XL, HT90) and resin printers (SL1S). A lot of
342.
by bborud 2y ago
> This serves only to enrich our American tech monopolies I suspect many people see that as a worthy cause. They may not understand what it implies, but dammit, they don’t want none of that foreign spyware.
343.
by bborud 2y ago
I understand what you think you are seeing and that you are probably not alone in this. But you haven’t managed to convince me that there is a «cohesive coalition». I think people who believe that this is what they see may have gotten a bit
344.
by bborud 2y ago
I was hoping for someone to share a bit of insight on why they think so. (I too suspect it will not achieve the desired outcome, but I had hoped someone could shed some light on the particular conditions in Spain rather some default answer)
345.
by bborud 2y ago
“White men are evil” does not turn everyone else into a “cohesive political coalition”.
346.
by bborud 2y ago
I never understood why people bought Sonos products. They were fairly poor in terms of usability even before any shenanigans. My first and only Sonos ended up in a rubbish bin (well recycling bin) when it turned out it couldn’t reliably Pla
347.
by bborud 2y ago
Would it work or would it just make things worse?
348.
by bborud 2y ago
> Many on the left believe that non-whites are a cohesive political coalition What percentage of what group is “many on the left”? This does not sound plausible to me.
349.
by bborud 2y ago
No, there isn't. It is just other versions of the same problem with people pretending it is somehow different. People generally like to complain about NULL/nil whatever, but they rarely think about what the alternatives mean and
350.
by bborud 2y ago
This is one law that would stand an exactly zero percent chance of ever passing the US congress. For the simple reason that those who would stand to potentially lose money over such a law own the law makers. I'm sorry, but the legislat
351.
by bborud 2y ago
It isn't "from who" (well, "from whom") it is "from what". They appear to be set to move more power to the executive branch from the other branches of government while at the same time undermining both ind
352.
by bborud 2y ago
No, it isn't about a big cash-out. It is about the thing people crave once they have more money than they can physically spend on things that are fun: power.
353.
by bborud 2y ago
Most of us don't see the need to do something until after it is done.
354.
by bborud 2y ago
What makes you think, for instance, Go concurrency is harder to teach than async/await?
355.
by bborud 2y ago
The comments remind me of the Judean People’s Front scene from Life of Brian. Everyone has their solution to the problem - so there is no solution.
356.
by bborud 2y ago
CSP is simpler. Simpler is easier to get right. I used to write a lot of asynchronous servers in C up until a couple of decades ago. I found it easy. Most people didn't. We have better ways of doing things today.
357.
by bborud 2y ago
> Single source of truth. So to get a single source of truth we make, presumably, the same truth have more sources. I think I know what you mean (sources as in standards organizations, not individual standards), but I also think that peo
358.
by bborud 2y ago
No aspect of this is good for anyone. First, standards you have to pay to obtain are a really, really bad thing. Second, I wish more effort would go into designing standards and implementations that aren't such an endless time sink whe
359.
by bborud 2y ago
Why is Google not policing this? Liability concerns?
360.
by bborud 2y ago
Yes, but are we to assume that 1.45 billion people are without agency?

More ›