bbbbb5

12 ms·

61.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
No, unfortunately not. For that I just use an USRP to alert on nearby TETRA handsets, not super reliable though. There are UK companies with a similar commercial products https://www.targetblueye.co.uk https://www.pyt
62.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
These are absolutely game-changing while driving, makes spotting cop cars a breeze.
63.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
Those sites are fake. Just like the sites selling weapons are fake. The sites selling credit card dumps with pins are fake. The sites selling hitman services are fake. If they find some idiot willing to send them money to "buy a child
64.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
>Do you really want to visit this site? I'm fascinated because I track things like this for a living, but have never heard of anything similar to what was described here.
65.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
Maybe? Never seen it, curious if you have links to share.
66.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
Go on then, link this "dark web" website where they sell people. What do you even mean by "dark web"? Stuff like this definitely doesn't exist on the onionland.
67.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
> there are actually online marketplaces, similar to how Amazon is for goods, to sell humans! This should be easy to prove. Closest I can think of is some Telegram groups you might find in places like Syria, but that hardly warrants the
68.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
https://www.nordicsemi.com/products
69.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
Accelerationism is also bad, yes. A rather nihilistic way of looking at things.
70.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
There are tradeoffs to cowardice, yeah.
71.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
Yes, the article does not give a clear answer. However, simply looking at the text of the CFAA leaves little doubt that you'd be in violation if Netflix clearly communicates that you aren't allowed to log in with someone else&#x27
72.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
> Regular crooks don't get the same treatment of walking out of jail before actually paying posting the bond money. Usually with a 10% fee for the bondsman Bail bondsmen basically do not exist in federal courts. But sure, regular cr
73.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
If you read the last line of my previous comment you will find a short-form refutation. Here's a longer explanation by a former federal prosecutor, current criminal defence attorney https://www.serioustrouble.show/p&#x2
74.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
Yeah, my main point is that it remains far from clear as to how the government would approach a situation like the 2016 DAO hack. >“Exploiting a smart contract” isn’t a specific offense, and some instances might be legal. Exactly, there
75.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
It's worth noting that the indictment seems to focus on very specific technical details of how this hack happened, rather than trying to suggest that hacking smart contracts would be broadly illegal. It seems that exploiting a smart co
76.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
This seems like a particularly twisted take. Poor people get excessively long sentences so SBF should too? What a messed up line of thinking. A healthy take would be "Hopefully everyone gets a reasonable sentence, SBF included"
77.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
This has been refuted over and over again by people who aren't entirely clueless. What's even supposed to be the logic here? Where do you think that "$250M" figure comes? Why are you assigning some special meaning to it?
78.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
The FBI is a completely different entity which exists below the congress, the FBI can't really threaten you with the congress.
79.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
How come? Assuming multiple people have had access to the keys, it's hardly a given that you'd be caught. Just use Tails or similar to transfer the money to a wallet you control, and don't touch it until many years later when
80.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
It takes forever for DVLA to remove a car and they'll leave a notice first (unless it's UK registered and untaxed)
81.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
>but at least in my experience, when opening a bank account in person, they do diligent checks Most banks don't even have UV lights, not that fake IDs don't usually have decent UV markings anyway. Hardly very diligent. >for
82.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
If Netflix changes their mind and adds a banner on the login page telling you otherwise, it suddenly becomes unauthorised access.
83.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
As far as I understand, it probably is https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/12/take-two-ninth-circuit...
84.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
This seems like a clear-cut example of unauthorised access, at least if Netflix chooses to clearly communicate that you aren't allowed to use someone else's account. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/compu
85.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
You don't see how that's an appeal to authority, I don't see how my comment violated the site guidelines. I wasn't name-calling or swiping at anyone, I was merely refuting the parents appeal to authority.
86.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
No plates=/=untaxed. Councils do not have power to remove untaxed vehicles, DVLA would have to do it (they won't).
87.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
Breached.vc is not a scammy site. Writing "raidforums" does not increase pagerank.
88.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
> actually useful identity cards It costs like 100 euros to buy a fake ID that'll work at any bank in Germany. This is a bizarre trope oft-repeated on HN by techies who think that banks actually verify chipped ID cards, they do not.
89.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
>Their scams are purposefully asinine. It's not profitable to spend time and effort into tricking the wise into an unwise act. It's far more profitable searching for the unwise to act in kind. So when you throw your hands up as
90.
by bbbbb5 4y ago
Can't edit comments that old, but I feel like my first sentence was perfectly appropriate given the parents appeal to authority ("I built telecommunications systems / software for some time").

More ›