Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bawolff
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
25 ms
·
751.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
Is the idea that this is for situations you can't set `ulimit -s` ? This seems like a lot of work when you could just increase the stack size instead.
752.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
In the past when i tried just using image magick's built in -kmeans for this, i found chosing the second most prominent colour often looked really good. The primary was too much of the same thing.
753.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
If they were going to do it, it would probably look a lot like Ukraine's spiderweb attack. However if they were going/able to do it, they probably wouldn't warn everyone and ruin the element of surprise, they would just do it
754.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
So... did they have backups? Wipe all data kind of seems like the best kind of cyberattack if you have backups. No data falling into wrong hands, no left behind rootkits, no ransome threats etc
755.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
> The answer: A drone. The damage, little to none. I'm sure that will be a real comfort to all the people who have died from drone strikes.
756.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
> Where did you pull Greece from? They hit cyprus, Greece seens to be a plausible estimate of the outer edge of their range.
757.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
There is a big difference between iranian agents sneaking onto us homeland and conducting an attack vs just inspiring a sympathetic person to commit a violent act.
758.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
I'd point out that "terrorist attack" isn't really well defined here from an international law perspective afaik. I guess what you are trying to say is it would be a war crime?
759.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
In which case why is this a news story? They have already been doing that since the war began (rip AWS data centers in UAE and Bahrain)
760.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
One of the reasons not to start wars with other countries is it gives them the right to blockade your ports.
761.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
It seems kind of unlikey to me. Cyber attacks are unlikely to meaningfully change the result of the war, so it would kind of just be a waste from the china/russia perspective. They so far havent lifted a finger to do anything for iran
762.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
Did iran provide a warning before striking the Ras Tanura oil refining facility? I dont recall seeing that in the news but i might have missed it.
763.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
I guess i should say, nobody holds back out of being nice. If they hold back its because of some strategic benefit, such as rationing the weapons for the long haul. What is the strategic benefit here of not attacking? The warning is unlikel
764.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
Is a cyberattack a military action? Like if you take over a control system to open a dam, sure i'd buy that as counting. But say ddos'ing a website? Its hard for me to picture that as counting as an armed attack. > Traditionall
765.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
Pretty sure if they were capable of that then they would just do it instead of threatening to do it. Nobody in the middle of an existential war threatens to attack more - they just attack with everything they've got. After all, they al
766.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
> homomorphic encryption chip speeds operations 5,000-fold 5000 * 0 is still 0. I joke, but i think relative numbers like this are very misleading as FHE is starting from such an absurdly slow place. Still, this is pretty cool and there
767.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
Quantum computing is cool, but a lot of the people who were hyping it last year were absolute charletons. They were promosing things that quantum computers couldn't even do theoretically let alone next year. Even the more down to earth
768.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
Honestly i think he was remarkably polite given the sort of crap we are talking about.
769.
▲
WikiFlix – freely licened/public domain movies uploaded to Wikipedia
(wikiflix.toolforge.org)
5 points
by
bawolff
8mo ago
|
1 comments
770.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
I randomly stumbled upon this today and thought it was cool so thought i would share.
771.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
I'm sorry, but that sounds like it would be a debugging nightmare when it doesn't work right.
772.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
> Many won't care unless you show them an actual study Why are the pro AI people so obsessed with proving the AI skeptics wrong. Is AI is working for you? Great. Go make great things. Isn't that the point after all? Who cares w
773.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
It wasnt just that he was in his official residence, he was having a high level meeting with other senior members of the Iranian government. It seems likely the war started early (normally america strikes in the middle of the night) simply
774.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
> Prior to this, any admin had that ability until it was taken away due to English Wikipedia admins reverting Wikimedia changes to site presentation (Mediaviewer). You're mixing up events. Superprotect is unrelated to the IAdmin sep
775.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
Almost certainly not AI due to the age of when it was written. However its a very simple script. I think its certainly within the realm of AI to write a short script that makes a few api requests.
776.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
Its misinformation that the malicious script loaded that domain. The malicious script did have a url with that domain in it, but it wouldnt load javascript from it (possibly due to a programming mistake/misunderstanding by the author,
777.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
> Restricting it to "interface admin" only is a fairly recent change. Its been 8 years!
778.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
Fyi they released an official statement: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation/Product...
779.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
You mean like SRI? That's not really what happened here, so its not really relavent.
780.
▲
by
bawolff
8mo ago
Nothing was rolled back in the db sense, i think people just used normal wiki revert tools. It also never effected wikipedia, just the smaller meta site (used for interproject coordination)
More ›