Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bauruine
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
181.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
https://archive.is/ahqeC
182.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
It's a tug of war. Disney could route their traffic via their T1s where the Australian ISPs also have to pay to receive the traffic. Who can pay longer? And if there is a working market of ISPs the ones with peering or caches in their
183.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
If an exchange tries to squeeze it's participants they can just do a PNI or create their own. An exchange in it's simplest form is just a switch after all.
184.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
This auto configuration mechanism is called stateless address autoconfiguration (SLAAC) so "Your OS disable IPv6 SLAAC" or something like that in your favorite search engine should give you the answer. After that you should be abl
185.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
>Please provide me the level of documentation you are looking for, but for an IPv4 network. Could help to get an idea what you see as "hobbyist level". Setting up IPv6 has been pretty straight forward on plain Ubuntu as a route
186.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
There are millions of people using IPv6 without knowing it. The ISP has everything preconfigured and if you use a third party router it's normaly one or two options to set. And it just works like for IPv4.
187.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
I don't think that exists and I can't imagine how a IPv6 translation layer with internally IPv4 addresses should work. What exactly do you want to do?
188.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
Going IPv6 only is a pain for sure but why not do dual stack and upgrade one by one and get comfortable with it first?
189.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
True but the "state owned ISP" in Switzerland only has XGS-PON hardware. So Init7 could only provide 25Gbit/s in the parts of the network thats not PON.
190.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
IPv6 is backwards compatible to IPv4 but not the other way around. If you have a solution how to address a 128bit IPv6 address with the 32bits available on v4 I'm sure many people are eager to talk to you. It's just not possible.
191.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
It's not PON thats why they are able to provide 25 Gbit/s. And they choose 25 Gbit/s because the switches for it where only slightly more expensive than the 10 Gbit/s version would have been. They did a talk about it som
192.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
There are some services that have a different resource record in DNS like email (MX) or use SRV records like XMPP but else yes you are forced to either use a different hostname (like www. and ftp. and mail.) or do it port based with NAT lik
193.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
Why is it so painful for you? As someone that has been running everything dualstack for over a decade I'm seriously interested where people are struggling with it. The only pain I've ever seen is in corporate networks where all th
194.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
IPv6 is compatible with IPv4 there are millions of devices with only an IPv6 address that work just fine.
195.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
I live near it and there is also a data center just next to the cryo facility [0] that was built around the same time. I sometimes jokingly say they are related and are training an AI with the frozen people. [0] https://www.googl
196.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
Some enterprise software I guess? I have native IPv6 since 2010 and can't remember a single software that crashed because of it.
197.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
You can also do recurring donations. Running a Snowflake proxy is basically free if you don't pay for internet traffic so it's a very cheap and low work way to help censored people.
198.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
How do you "find" them? You can just download the list with all exit node IPs. https://check.torproject.org/torbulkexitlist
199.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
hn has two servers at m5hosting which according to their FAQ [0] "IPv6 support is currently available for Dedicated Servers or Colocation." so you ask support, they assign you a prefix and you add a few IPs from that prefix. done.
200.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
There is also a standalone (go) version [0] that can be deployed on a server. "one of the main advantages of standalone Snowflake proxies is that they can be installed on servers and offer a higher bandwidth and more reliable option fo
201.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
No only if you explicitely enable it in the config file.
202.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
>I'd expect us all to be dead almost instantly Not an expert at all but from what I've read you'd expect wrong. Even if they could create a black hole out of the Matterhorn it would be so small, less than a hydrogen atom,
203.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
A less controversal site, at least on hn, may be wikileaks https://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2010/12/07/visa-m...
204.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
Whenever I read something like this I look my access and sshd logs for abuse IPs and check if they are Tor exit nodes. The Tor traffic is always negligible like 100 failed ssh logins out of 170k are from Tor exit nodes. Or 670 out of 400k f
205.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
The negative health effects of PFAS are completely irrelevant if the alternative to this "bad blood" is death.
206.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
The people that received your blood have most likely "destroyed" alot of their own which most likely also contained PFAS thats why they need yours. No need to deliberately throw away perfectly good blood.
207.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
>There's some research out of Australia indicating blood donation is effective at removing it from the body. Great. Another reason to regularly donate blood. And you don't even have to pay 399$!
208.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
This "list" thing sounds like FUD when you read articles with a titel like "U.S. Intelligence Has Amassed 'Sensitive and Intimate' Data on 'Nearly Everyone'" https://gizmodo.com/u-s-i
209.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
50$ for unmetered 1Gbps is 0.000147964$ per Gigabyte. AWS charges like 0.02$ per Gigabyte or 6758$ per Gbps. Somehow people think the later is justified while the first is the biggest ripp off. Can somebody explain this to me?
210.
▲
by
bauruine
3y ago
When did you last try Tor? The DDoS [0] has ended and it's now pretty fast again. I'm watching a 4k youtube video over Tor right now. Also the next version implements traffic splitting [1] which should improve performance even mor
More ›