baq

20 ms·

601.
by baq 6mo ago
Anecdotally it’s the exact opposite for me: gpt 5.4 is leagues ahead of opus for the kind of backend work I do. Opus keeps making stupid mistakes while overengineering the irrelevant parts. However when I have to work on the backoffice ui
602.
by baq 6mo ago
Wait till you try codex so you don’t have to keep saying ‘don’t be lazy’
603.
by baq 6mo ago
and the code is in the training set, so you can trivially[0] ask an LLM to summon it back either from memory or just by asking it to revert the removal commit. [0] not trivially if you want to validate if it works
604.
by baq 6mo ago
I have! Thanks
605.
by baq 6mo ago
substation...? more like an SMR
606.
by baq 6mo ago
1000 charges 10-80% for a passenger car at 300-400 km per charge is 300 000 - 400 000 km of fast charge driving. I'd say it's perfectly fine for most people?
607.
by baq 6mo ago
you've never tried to use gemini 3 I guess - that thing was so unreliable it might as well not be offered; there's also a reason why everybody here is excited for claude and codex, but not really for antigravity. that said, I actu
608.
by baq 6mo ago
SQL Server is an amazing RDBMS. Expensive as hell, too.
609.
by baq 6mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification
610.
by baq 6mo ago
Yes, in that sense, technically correct. I postulate in practice this won't matter since the space of use cases is so large if Kimi released the absolutely best model at everything they wouldn't be able to serve it (c.f. Mythos).
611.
by baq 6mo ago
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/networking#mir...
612.
by baq 6mo ago
> But the problem is, they have no moat I disagree very strongly with this, both anecdotally and in the data - subscriptions are growing in all frontier providers; anecdata is right here in HN when you look around almost everyone is talk
613.
by baq 6mo ago
Enshittification 101, codex is undergoing the same thing on a 3 month lag.
614.
by baq 6mo ago
$20B ARR or so reported added in Q1 doesn’t sound particularly bad, they’ll raise effective prices some more while Claude diffuses into the economy, sounds like a money printer. The issue is they’re compute constrained on the supply side to
615.
by baq 6mo ago
Not OP - my two issues with tailscale today: - breaks wsl mirrored network to the point a reboot is needed (not sure how much of this is on windows, though) - break dns randomly on an Debian system to the point I have a watchdog timer syste
616.
by baq 6mo ago
> I do not understand the appeal of the workflow of working on separate things in parallel, then splitting it off into branches/commits. Your repo is small and/or your CI is fast. You’ll understand in a big repo or when CI has
617.
by baq 6mo ago
Why would you like git and not jj is beyond me, this must be something like two electric charges being the same and repelling themselves. It’s the same underlying data structure with a bit different axioms (conflicts allowed to be committed
618.
by baq 6mo ago
Would you please think of the shareholders
619.
by baq 6mo ago
Actually it’s more relevant than ever since agents trivially parallelize work, but it still needs to be validated together. You can work on individual branches in worktrees and have the ‘megamerge’ in yet another.
620.
by baq 6mo ago
If your CI pipeline takes hours and it has good reasons to you start to do things like this.
621.
by baq 6mo ago
nice try mr FBI agent
622.
by baq 6mo ago
Always has been, it’s literally saas; the slight difference is that the lowest tier subscriptions at the frontier labs are basically free trials nowadays, too
623.
by baq 6mo ago
it is finitely better today and will be better still. this doesn't mean it's better at everything a human driver can do, it's just better on average. the jagged frontier is real and a very important safety consideration; neve
624.
by baq 6mo ago
> They did point out, with numbers, that the SF scene is a lot smaller than would ordinarily be expected. ‘Assuming no correlation’. In reality the correlation is probably an epsilon away from 1 in this case.
625.
by baq 6mo ago
Nothing ever happens eh?
626.
by baq 6mo ago
What protection? What privacy? Smoke and mirrors, mostly. NAT is a firewall with extra steps. IPv6 reduces complexity. Privacy (illusion of it, anyway, just like in ipv4 NAT) is handled by private addresses. …and if you really want to, NAT
627.
by baq 6mo ago
What firewalling? You don’t have an ipv4 firewall?
628.
by baq 6mo ago
The agents are already learning to manage agents, if it’s relevancy you’re looking for you might want to take up plumbing instead.
629.
by baq 6mo ago
Talking to computers and expecting computers to answer coherent English was science fiction 4 years ago. Don’t lose faith
630.
by baq 6mo ago
This isn’t necessarily a bad thing. I know a little css and have zero desire or motivation to know more; the things I’d like done that need css just wouldn’t have been done without LLMs.

More ›