bangaladore

8 ms·

61.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
Looks like a serious competitor to Unity. Modern C# is really easy to pick up for beginners (that's actually how I started learning programming back around 2010). What does monetization look like? Can you ship standalone games? Source
62.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20251125224147/https://blog.trai...
63.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
> but for the hobbyist it makes no difference if the processor on the Arduino is an Atmel or an ARM. I don't think anyone was arguing they cared about Atmel vs ARM. In fact, the point of Arduino is to make that not even something a
64.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
Yes, their MCU offerings are. And I generally think that Micropython is a better "modern" Arduino. But most people know them for their Linux boards. And that's what OC was talking about.
65.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
RPi is not a good analog compared to Arduino. The main feature of classic Arduino boards has always been a thin abstraction layer on bare metal. RPi is not that at all. (As mentioned by the other commenter, I'm referring to their Linux
66.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
Part of the issue with the "slogan" is Cursor/XYZ jank IDE is already "for files". "Cursor for data" seems slightly better in my opinion. You are clearly using "Cursor" as something to draw fami
67.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
Nitpick: Cursor for Files makes approximately zero sense to me given what I see here. Feedback: Supporting an enterprise air gapped solution of this clearly has huge value. It really doesn't matter where the data is stored if the index
68.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
Probably still can't get past a Google Captcha when on a VPN. Do I click the square with the shoe of the person who's riding the motorcycle?
69.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
Someone might be wondering why someone might have different URLs. One example is anyone under sovereign clouds (eg. GCC, GCC-High) which use different URLs (and TLDs) across the board (eg outlook.office365.us)
70.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
That's due to Electron, not Chromium. Which is exactly why VSCode has a near parity version that runs on the web, under any browser engine. Saying VSCode is based on Chromium doesn't make any sense.
71.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
To the downvoter: VSCode -> Electron (essentially purpose specific web browser) -> Chromium news.ycombinator.com -> General Purpose Web Browser -> Chromium
72.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
Every year NASA has a 50% chance of winning the Superbowl- even on Earth! Either they win or don't. /s
73.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
That's like saying news.ycombinator.com is based on Chromium. VSCode runs on chromium, like any website you visit when using a Chromium browser.
74.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
I disagree. All photos have an exposure time; that's an inherent property of them (think film). Compositing images digitally on top one another is not an inherent property of photos. You can double expose film, and I think that's
75.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
On a Reddit thread somewhere, the OP mentioned the sun is taken as a mosaic, where the picture taken with just the person is a very small FOV which excludes the paramotor.
76.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
I'm not sure I agree that OCs argument was focused on knowing that you were hosting illegal material that is encrypted. I'd argue that no-where in jiggawatt's comment is that argued. I think that's your argument, which i
77.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
In my experience most chips released in the past 10+ years ship with C++ compilers. Quite frankly I'm not sure why you wouldn't given that most are using GCC on common architectures. The chip vendor doesn't have to do any wor
78.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
The area under that curve is quite a bit less than 50B.
79.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
You might want to look into what GCHQ, DGSE, and BND (as examples) actually do. Europe is not some surveillance-free zone.
80.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
If this were the case nobody would ever offer file hosting services (eg. Google Drive). Do you have any case history to show any company getting prosecuted for unknowingly hosting encrypted blobs of illegal material? Obviously if they have
81.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
Yes. Using another machine, record the screen & programmatically move mouse. At that point you have to look at heuristics (assuming the input device is not trivially detectable vs a legit one). However, that can obviously only be used f
82.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
DMA is "easy" to patch. No reason to allow a device to have arbitrary memory access. Just require use of IOMMU. FaceIT essentially has countered most modern cheats including those using DMA. https://www.faceit.com/
83.
by bangaladore 11mo ago
Unless you made a typo here-- Apple's equivalent to this is Mac Mini, which has soldered CPU, GPU and RAM (and also the SSD as its not soldered, but it's not standard).
84.
by bangaladore 1y ago
> I.e.: If the security/privacy guarantees really are as advertised, then ipso facto someone could store child porn in the system and the provider couldn't detect this. But what they would be storing in this case is not illegal
85.
by bangaladore 1y ago
A company of what country would you prefer? Everyone likes to dunk on the US, but I doubt you could provide a single example of a country that is certainly a better alternative (to be clear I believe many of the west up in the same boat).
86.
by bangaladore 1y ago
Memory safety is a very small concern for most cryptographic implementations (e.g Side Channel attacks). Rust solves essentially none of the other concerns.
87.
by bangaladore 1y ago
Yup, I really like their microcontrollers (which quite frankly nowadays what's the difference between an SOC and some of these more capable MCUs), but my comment was specifically relating to their "Linux" capable boards.
88.
by bangaladore 1y ago
Yes, thank you for the correction.
89.
by bangaladore 1y ago
Title critique: RaspberryPi is not an SoC vendor. They take proprietary SOCs from Broadcom, use proprietary firmware and build a product around it. They obviously upstream what they can, but they fundamentally are a system integrator, not a
90.
by bangaladore 1y ago
> Automatic secret detection: Scans for API keys, passwords, and tokens before committing Surely this is done on-device right? Or is the prompt asking the LLM if there are secrets in the changes. Arguably I trust Github / Gitlab &#x

More ›