bananapub

7 ms·

91.
by bananapub 1y ago
no you don't, you can just run https://github.com/joohoi/acme-dns anywhere, and then CNAME _acme_challenge.realdomain.com to aklsfdsdl239072109387219038712.acme-dns.anywhere.com. then your ACME client just talks
92.
by bananapub 1y ago
it's not really a "case for" anything, to my eye it's mostly that as companies get bigger they are more willing (and able) to just spaff $10m up a wall on something very stupid like a .com domain to replace the domain th
93.
by bananapub 1y ago
gogs existed, gitea forked from it, gitea made some corporate structure change some people didn't like, they forked forgejo, codeberg is a hosted instance of forgejo.
94.
by bananapub 1y ago
that's old thinking, the new thinking is just make it irrelevant if you're a bank or not (see "shadow banking") and let you do whatever. another good example - a company is offering national sports betting, in violation
95.
by bananapub 1y ago
gpt-5 doesn't "think" anything, and all LLMs routinely return incorrect things in their output, which is why you're meant to have a human who knows what they're doing review it before doing anything with it/was
96.
by bananapub 1y ago
it truly is astonishing how idiotic or malicious so many of the posters on HN are in the face of this. yes, actually, it is bad if a bunch of racist lunatics are personally in charge of things, and increase their personal power to make arbi
97.
by bananapub 1y ago
yes, everyone who cares about code quality should do that, that was what I'm talking about - even after automated tests, and automated linting, 10k is a huge amount of code for one person to coherently review each day.
98.
by bananapub 1y ago
huh? he would be extremely pleased to pay for (and have to listen to the complaints of) far fewer programmers.
99.
by bananapub 1y ago
how are you even meant to review 10k lines of code a day?
100.
by bananapub 1y ago
it's a pretty reasonable position for someone to think "a company now sells a service that lets you generate fake porn of any human" is a bad thing and shouldn't be allowed, regardless of whether you make people jump thr
101.
by bananapub 1y ago
opencode, but note that all the self-hosted llms are much worse at coding than claude code with opus/sonnet. there's also claude-code-proxy to make claude code use other models.
102.
by bananapub 1y ago
> This collection features battle-tested subagent definitions following best practices and industry standards Amazing there’s been time for battles and best practices and industry standards in the like weeks since Anthropic added this fe
103.
by bananapub 1y ago
huh? Claude Mad is tens of hours of opus a month, or you can pay per token and have unlimited. Or did you mean “I wish it was cheaper”?
104.
by bananapub 1y ago
regular anecdata: it works great, at first I used to go back to Google a few times a month if Kagi didn't find something I was sure existed, but either Kagi got better or the web and/or Google got worse, because I don't go ba
105.
by bananapub 1y ago
hopefully we all remember Amdahl's law and reflect on how much time a software engineer actually spends on the "typing code" part of the job of "delivering software that solves some business need".
106.
by bananapub 1y ago
yes, so it is Trump policy to have the federal government cost more by paying for more contractors, as well as perform it's functions worse.
107.
by bananapub 1y ago
perhaps this a good moment for you to engage in some reflection and consider that perhaps some people have put more thought in to "how do we replace passwords" than you did in making a single hacker news comment? you: > A singl
108.
by bananapub 1y ago
(out of interest: did you ever write web apps before ~2010 or so? the answer to your question seems so obvious to me I'm not even sure where the confusion could come from, unless you've only ever written web apps that are "J
109.
by bananapub 1y ago
another side to this is how it's encouraging people to believe that the only way to get ahead is by more or less scamming. you can easily look at the world as a youngish person and see that getting ahead means affiliate marketing, or
110.
by bananapub 1y ago
did they not provide a copy of the CMS to the Internet Archive??!
111.
by bananapub 1y ago
not something one gets to say very often, but you're insufficiently cynical, tptacek. killing this means cutting of swathes of simple, orderly funding. what remains is donations etc, which is far less regular, and requires work to get
112.
by bananapub 1y ago
well, also it means that you can arbitrarily prosecute people, and it means Intuit etc will just give you, as a congressperson, bribes.
113.
by bananapub 1y ago
that's an insane pov. is it really your sincere proposition that after an American presedential election, there should be no expectation of anyone to criticise the winner, no matter what they do? really?
114.
by bananapub 1y ago
uh, no, the president has just claimed that the uni was not horrible enough to pro-palestine protestors and so he'll be randomly withholding federal money until they bend to his pathetic will and permanently destroy the independence of
115.
by bananapub 1y ago
I continue to find it fascinating that essentially none of the public American elite actually have any values at all. for all the whinging about "free speech" and "free markets" and "freedom from government",
116.
by bananapub 1y ago
still amazing to see no opposition from any Republican to the actual takeover of the actual government by the worst rich people in the world.
117.
by bananapub 1y ago
is there any news? the website has no information and doesn't really highlight anything other than their launch at a conference in 2022.
118.
by bananapub 1y ago
[2022]
119.
by bananapub 1y ago
their point is that lots of things everyone thinks of as "OS" things like "tcp" and "doing file IO" can just be done in user space by some new program without the processes that make use of these facilities kno
120.
by bananapub 1y ago
why is it strange? they're making it look slick and powerful and scifi and cool, as a - extremely successful - marketing gimmick.

More ›