Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
baldfat
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
98 ms
·
871.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
The more the cells the higher the chance for a mutation? The older we get the more opportunity for cell mutation?
872.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
> The reason being is that they are the best tool for the job.... They have a flat and clear response which is what you want when mixing. Did you not read how these things are not flat and not clear in any range besides the mids in the
873.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
I was a sol-20 kid
874.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
> A lot of the programs I read them over and thought that I could do the same thing in significantly less Python code. My racket code is usually many time smaller then my Python code. The nice thing about Racket/Lisp is you can just
875.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
I loved it when they didn't say what basic it was for. My dad ended up meeting a author of a few of the programs and he said, "Oh I never got that basic program to ever run." My dad was like my 9 year old fix it and walked aw
876.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
I really liked going through Realm of Racket with my 11 year old daughter. It pretty much is the same format. It made me miss the days of typing code from a book and hit run. (Well run never really worked then it was hours of debugging but
877.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
> ICQ got merged into the AIM network after AOL acquired ICQ. ICQ is still its own separate network. You could communicate between the two but ICQ will outlive AIM :)
878.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
Making your mouse a dust collector is key. I use qutebrowser for internet Ranger.py for file manager I also use a tiled window manager (i3) The only time I use the mouse is when I am doing creative work (video editing, graphics or music pro
879.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
https://www.norfolkwinters.com/vim-creep/
880.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
BUT they sound different and will mess up your mix. If your use to the Genelec direct sound you get a full range reference where problems stick out like a sharp stick in your ear. That is why people stick with them and don't use the ne
881.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
But I am talking about people in small studios. Since around 1998 or so the recording studio was revolutionized and 90% of studios are very small one bedroom or basement size spaces. My "all the time" is going from the late 1980s
882.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
I was trying to understand where the remark of me not understanding what I read. The article was not about them being "good" technically besides that if they sound good on a NS10 they will sound good on anything?
883.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
But that isn't saying that they were clear. It was because they were skewed in a way that would show ONE place that was also unique to older audio technology. That is not the issue with 20 year old speakers or the way people listen to
884.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
Those "speakers" are not meant to be a primary sound source, but I have heard some phones from HTC that sounded MUCH better than NS10.
885.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
Genelec are amazing speakers. They are the definition of reference. They are clean and they can be loud. They started out about the same time as the NS10 (1978) by the early 1980s they were the definition of the reference speaker. https:&#
886.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
I read and even quoted text? I don't get where I didn't read the article when I have few quotes from different parts?
887.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
> You clearly haven't read the article. The NS10 is an exceptionally good speaker in certain respects that are not immediately obvious and that convey vital information about a mix. How so? They were "GOOD?" Where did I mi
888.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
> Love or hate the Yamaha NS10, this unassuming little speaker has found a place in the studios of many of the world's top producers. We trace its history, and investigate why a monitor whose sound has been described as "horrib
889.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
> Will the ongoing merger of Chez with Racket make the latter a clear winner in the Scheme camp? Academically they have all the super giants of Scheme. It is now within the past few years with the renaming to Racket that the success stor
890.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
I start from stupid since I was 8 on Programming Languages. I taught myself Assembly and Pascal before I was a teenager. I learned Racket and Smalltalk to be a better problem solver. I ended up becoming a MUCH better programmer due to these
891.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
I am super excited for Chez. If we see the speed we are look at a possible doubling in speed. There is certainly a reason why he has stuck with Gambit and not my beloved Racket. This seems perfect for using Racket's macros. I just don&
892.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
That lie? They on the other hand recommended that people install anti-virus programs till that got pointed out. https://www.cnet.com/news/apple-suggests-mac-users-install-a... I hate that it is okay to lie. Of course a
893.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
It is going to bot created I am afraid to say. My city has good local coverage, a wee bit biased but it is local people in a School Board meetings and City Meetings at least. Google is funding the creation of software that writes local new
894.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
> Google Search is now "opt out"? No, not at all. It just doesn't let you get free articles behind the pay wall. So now you can either avoid the pay wall websites or you just block them.
895.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
These news paid sources are usually only valuable for local content. My local news paper' only redeeming value is it is local but it isn't $4 a week valuable.
896.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
Block the paid wall sources so you are not annoyed anymore. I have CNET blocked due to their CBS and CES Fiasco and never unblocked them. https://news.google.com/news/u/0/settings/sources?hl=en
897.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
You block the sources in your Google News feed. https://news.google.com/news/u/0/settings/sources?hl=en
898.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
Well there are different tools to clear up a audio track. $50 will get Audio Cleaning Lab. If I was home I would do a quick auto clean and then hand scrube the file. http://www.magix.com/us/audio-cleaning-lab/detai
899.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
That means if they had access to the gate we can change that to our taste. Hope that is an option in the function.
900.
▲
by
baldfat
9y ago
I have HIGH hopes that flatpak or snap will gain traction in Linux. This would in turn move Mac OS and Windows to a more container type system. (Mac OS is by far the closest right now)
More ›