bakugo

7 ms·

91.
by bakugo 3mo ago
Except it wasn't verified for accuracy. It never is. The whole point of using AI to write for you is that you don't care to or can't be bothered to do any significant work yourself. If you care enough to do the research requi
92.
by bakugo 3mo ago
> You know this makes OpenAI look really bad, right? Please do explain how this event that makes their product look powerful and perfectly aligns with their openly stated long term goals of pushing for more AI regulation makes them look
93.
by bakugo 3mo ago
Apparently, the lesson they learned is that their marketing+political stunt worked exactly as planned and they should keep doing what they're doing. They are still openly lobbying for more AI regulation. https://www.anthropi
94.
by bakugo 3mo ago
> it was genre typical What genre, if you don't mind me asking?
95.
by bakugo 3mo ago
> There will inevitably be some people who dismiss this story as a dishonest marketing trick by OpenAI to make their models sound terrifyingly effective. I found 81 instances of the term “marketing” in the Hacker News discussion of the i
96.
by bakugo 3mo ago
> Currently people care because so much of AI output is still poor quality. But given I personally know of someone with published AI-generated works where the reviews are gushing and positive across the board, I doubt people will care wh
97.
by bakugo 3mo ago
Fun fact about K3's distillation: As of a couple months ago, when using Claude to write adult content through the API, sometimes it will silently inject a system prompt giving the model a bunch of guidelines on exactly what kind of adu
98.
by bakugo 3mo ago
It's not really the same thing. "Normal" streamers are watched for a variety of reasons: maybe their personality is entertaining and charismatic, maybe they're really good at the game(s) they play (speedrunners in partic
99.
by bakugo 3mo ago
People will make up a million different reasons, but at the end of the day, the vast majority of vtuber viewers are single men who like to pretend the streamer is their (girl)friend.
100.
by bakugo 3mo ago
I've heard the "if you hate vibe coding you must also hate compilers" strawman so many times, I'm sure it's been said by someone with a "name and reputation" at least once.
101.
by bakugo 3mo ago
The latest and greatest method of exploiting and monetizing the male loneliness epidemic.
102.
by bakugo 3mo ago
Correct.
103.
by bakugo 3mo ago
Would anyone pay a human to create an SVG of a pelican riding a bike?
104.
by bakugo 3mo ago
How can building an application feel like a reward when you're not the one who built it? And before you post the obvious response, no, if you're truly "100x faster", you're not reading or even thinking about anythin
105.
by bakugo 3mo ago
> The AIs will adapt to this I don't think this is true, at least not right now, and in a way I'm actually thankful for it. The frantic rush to chase the only potentially profitable use case for LLMs found so far (writing code)
106.
by bakugo 3mo ago
If something like this was implemented, the benefit of the doubt would have to be given in ambiguous cases, but I don't think it's that hard to tell most of the time. The latest codemaxxed models all tend to write in very distinct
107.
by bakugo 3mo ago
If this becomes common, it's trivially detectable with good ol' toString().
108.
by bakugo 3mo ago
As far as I understand, "flagging" is intended for things that break the guidelines. AI-generated content is explicitly banned, but only in comments, not submissions. I think it would be great if AI-generated submissions were outr
109.
by bakugo 3mo ago
Part of it might feel like ad hominem, but I think the bluntness is justified in this case. It provides some pretty important context on the situation. As an outside observer who knew little about Zig and Bun, the impression I got is that t
110.
by bakugo 3mo ago
Vibe code was never meant to be reviewed. These rewrites are just test-driven development taken to the absolute extreme. Created under the hope that the existing tests are exhaustive and cover every relevant use case, such that if they all
111.
by bakugo 3mo ago
I don't really understand how "written by AI" and "for learning purposes" can ever be compatible. What exactly does one learn from typing "Rewrite this in Rust, make no mistakes" into a terminal?
112.
by bakugo 3mo ago
> But I read here every day that agents can't code. And that "real developers" spend more time fixing AI bugs than producing code, and it slows them down. This is all correct, though. I haven't tried this, but I can g
113.
by bakugo 3mo ago
> I would rather use a proven reliable system that’s been used and tested by millions of other users You're describing ZFS.
114.
by bakugo 3mo ago
It wasn't, this is just another free marketing piece for Anthropic.
115.
by bakugo 3mo ago
This article seems quite drawn out for what is essentially an ad hominem attack on the personal views of the creator of the language.
116.
by bakugo 4mo ago
In a sane world, this would be a clear cut case of false advertisement, and the real estate agents would be held liable for fraud. Sadly, we don't live in a sane world.
117.
by bakugo 4mo ago
This specific form of steganography was not present when the leak happened, as far as I can tell.
118.
by bakugo 4mo ago
I've heard that it was possible to trigger really obvious output poisoning on Fable with something as basic as asking the model to think outside of its built-in hidden thinking delimiters. This watermark may trigger a similar mechanism
119.
by bakugo 4mo ago
> steal the models or illegally distill them Oh no, they're trying to steal the models that were trained on stolen data? That's horrible, I feel so bad for Anthropic.
120.
by bakugo 4mo ago
Output poisoning and/or eventual account bans, if I had to guess.

More ›