bagxrvxpepzn

4 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by bagxrvxpepzn 1y ago

   He joins a proven unicorn at its inflection point and then leaves mere days after hitting his vesting cliff. All of this "learning" and "experience" talk is sopping wet with cynicism.
2. 32.▲
   by bagxrvxpepzn 2y ago

   > The C++ steering committee are the real extremists that are holding back the entire software industry because of a sacred cow and a free pass to externalize that cost onto the rest of us in terms of significantly less secure software.
3. 33.▲
   by bagxrvxpepzn 2y ago

   > What I don't understand is why you demand that C++ evolution be halted in a clearly suboptimal position so you don't need to change your processes. I don't demand that C++ evolution be halted. I support the current traje
4. 34.▲
   by bagxrvxpepzn 2y ago

   > Do you prefer the uncertainty of silent miscompilations and undefined behavior to upfront compiler errors? Yes because then I don't have to spend hours writing esoteric spaghetti code to prove something to the compiler that is tri
5. 35.▲
   by bagxrvxpepzn 2y ago

   To the people who work on C++ standards: I approve of the current C++ trajectory and please ignore all of the online noise about "the future of C++." To anyone that disagrees severely with the C++ trajectory as stated, please just