Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bagder
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
HTTP/2 connection coalescing
(daniel.haxx.se)
4 points
by
bagder
10y ago
|
0 comments
32.
▲
by
bagder
11y ago
-x is already in there, which is the short version of --proxy...
33.
▲
Content over HTTP/2
(daniel.haxx.se)
2 points
by
bagder
11y ago
|
0 comments
34.
▲
by
bagder
11y ago
The usage share there referred to stats from Mozilla and Firefox 36, where HTTP/1.0 is seen in 1% of all HTTP responses compared to 10% for HTTP/2. / Daniel - author of those slides
35.
▲
by
bagder
12y ago
That's excellent to hear, thanks! If you have a public URL with such a statement I'd link to it from the post... (hint hint) =)
36.
▲
by
bagder
12y ago
Yes it is indeed by the author of curl! (me ;-)
37.
▲
by
bagder
12y ago
curl has a --libcurl option which you can add to a curl command line, and then it'll generate a libcurl-using C code template for that same operation...
38.
▲
by
bagder
12y ago
It all depends on how you count and what a "user" is of course, but this little list helps to give a picture: http://curl.haxx.se/docs/companies.html
39.
▲
by
bagder
12y ago
I believe they originally come from the libwww-perl project? According to wikipedia it was first released with perl 4.0036, which was in Februrary 1993, but I can't find out if it included GET and HEAD etc already then...
40.
▲
by
bagder
12y ago
Those were the early days of HTTP, so no, people didn't really get a lot of HTTP "manually" like that. We used other existing tools to get gopher and ftp though. When I started my work on httpget in 1996, I didn't know a
41.
▲
Curl, 17 years old today
(daniel.haxx.se)
420 points
by
bagder
12y ago
|
95 comments
42.
▲
TLS in HTTP/2
(daniel.haxx.se)
93 points
by
bagder
12y ago
|
33 comments
43.
▲
by
bagder
12y ago
As the author of the document - thanks!
44.
▲
by
bagder
12y ago
Sorry, but that doesn't make a lot of sense. Pipelining is far from a replacement for HTTP/2 as the document explains a bit. Besides, Safari already supports SPDY because of this.
45.
▲
by
bagder
12y ago
This doesn't drive the standards process in any particular direction, this is just a broken implementation that doesn't adhere to the current standard draft!