baddash

5 ms·

31.
by baddash 4mo ago
i haven't finished either, but once i do i can send you a message or something. my email is on my profile if you wanna exchange contact info
32.
by baddash 4mo ago
i'm working on something similar, not a full agent harness but an agentic workflow app so i can learn too. if you're interested in sharing it would be awesome to take a look. i can share my project too!
33.
by baddash 4mo ago
cool, sorry if i missed this but what initially inspired you to make alint?
34.
by baddash 4mo ago
Look into Haier's RenDanHeYi philosophy. One of my ambitions is to adopt that model when I start a company, and I think it is awesome and the future. BTW, seems like we think similarly regarding this. Wanna exchange contact info? my em
35.
by baddash 4mo ago
Not from simply looking at the answer. From knowing the answer and reverse-engineering or understanding how to arrive at that answer in the first place. It's not always the best way of learning, but it definitely is a great way to lear
36.
by baddash 4mo ago
Even though it seems radical, I think the right approach is to simply allow the students to use AI to its full potential, to generate answers, code, whatever. The onus should be on the instructor to make sure that the student ends up actual
37.
by baddash 4mo ago
I'm not talking about AI technology we use as the next generation of tooling. I am talking about new, possibly multiple intelligent species emerging which are superior to humanity.
38.
by baddash 4mo ago
awesome thank you
39.
Ask HN: What could happen if human beings become obsolete?
6 points by baddash 4mo ago|5 comments
40.
by baddash 4mo ago
i think we are all beating around the bush and not addressing the root issue: AI could obsolete human beings in the future. what i'm not seeing is discussion or exploration of different branches or paths that could occur once that happ
41.
Architectural Katas(architecturalkatas.com)
1 points by baddash 4mo ago|0 comments
42.
by baddash 4mo ago
glad i gave that disclaimer to my advice then lol. my question then is, how long will that happen with AI psychotic upper management?
43.
by baddash 4mo ago
This honestly makes me feel ambivalent, as on the one hand, it is awesome that it is pushing creatives to be more original, but on the other hand it does threaten these types of creatives who have invested time into making this their liveli
44.
by baddash 4mo ago
what you described is not how originality works. think about how in music, when an artist comes out with something original and awesome, and then everyone starts copying it and creating their own derivative works, like Jimi Hendrix or somet
45.
by baddash 4mo ago
I also define "slop" in a similar way. However, I specifically define it as creations that lack soul or originality. And can actually have a high degree of quality in some aspects, as you can see with some AI generated art and mus
46.
by baddash 4mo ago
then it isn't a slop fork machine anymore is it? i was under the impression that the best the SFM would get is generating... how do I say this? high quality low quality work. Basically, the ability to cheaply produce quality work, char
47.
by baddash 4mo ago
well... shit
48.
by baddash 4mo ago
I argue the opposite, that originality will actually become more valuable. Think about it: everyone has characterized AI slop, as slop. Which means that we negatively value it in terms of originality. Combine that with the fact that there w
49.
by baddash 4mo ago
This psychosis you keep referring to will only end up punishing the ones who subscribe to it wouldn't it? Since it's out of touch with reality. If that's indeed the case, then it sounds like an opportunity to get ahead of the
50.
by baddash 4mo ago
That's good to know, because all I really go off of is what I see posted online which is most likely skewed towards the polarizing takes (been unemployed for a while). Sounds like some positive news though, and I hope that these tools
51.
by baddash 4mo ago
people need to reframe coding agent usage. i see a lot of framing in zero-sum terms where it's either all dev or all agent, and then people start dooming and glooming over the latter. in reality it's like that one post on here a f
52.
by baddash 5mo ago
same, my fat ass is ultra curious
53.
by baddash 5mo ago
in before every project manager on planet earth makes a "guess we don't need you devs anymore haha" joke during morning standup
54.
I Gave My OpenClaw Agent a Physical Body(wired.com)
3 points by baddash 5mo ago|1 comments
55.
by baddash 5mo ago
there's literally results in the screenshot they have, and when i do it
56.
by baddash 5mo ago
I don't mean to be some annoying contrarian or something, but couldn't it be the case that if the govt was investing someone who was planning a terrorist attack, then notifying the person being investigated could work against stop
57.
by baddash 5mo ago
You don't have to care, and I'm not really sure why you thought I think that. And yeah, people post their opinions on message boards. He posted his opinion, and I posted what I thought about it. What's the issue exactly? I&#x
58.
by baddash 5mo ago
It might be a purposefully sensationalist framing in order to increase KPIs. It works because a lot of people have strong opinions things without thinking much.
59.
by baddash 5mo ago
My thoughts as someone who doesn't know much about these types of things: 1. Terry Albury calling this list the "Panopticon" could have merit since he's a former FBI agent. However, I'd have to research more into hi
60.
by baddash 5mo ago
This is also what I was thinking... how did this article get so many upvotes when it has some glaringly weak points?

More ›