baby

16 ms·

391.
by baby 1y ago
The google folding pro works really well
392.
by baby 1y ago
Until you use one
393.
by baby 1y ago
Im a long time Apple person and in the last year I moved to Android just for the folding phone. It's just too good to pass honestly
394.
by baby 1y ago
Same here, I got excited thinking it was a folding phone on the left
395.
by baby 1y ago
Not me, I was hopping for a folding iPhone
396.
by baby 1y ago
Trend is towards screen real estate now, with folding phones
397.
by baby 1y ago
Same question here. Why would I buy this instead of folding phones that provide a tablet-like screen on demand?
398.
by baby 1y ago
IMO it's underwhelming considering folding phones have been out for many years now and we still don't have a folding iPhone. What are the PMs doing at Apple.
399.
by baby 1y ago
I just wanted a folding iPhone.
400.
by baby 1y ago
Sure but if you see something in front of you but LIDAR says "nope I can see 500m away" then you know LIDAR is right
401.
by baby 1y ago
I would say it cost less money, running a bank is a massive cost, entire cities like London, New York, and HK are built around the banking world.
402.
by baby 1y ago
It wouldn't surprise me if SEPA was running a BFT consensus protocol under the hood to ensure security
403.
by baby 1y ago
You are missing the "trust" element of a blockchain. A blockchain essentially allows you to run a distributed database where the different actors don't trust one another. Tradfi is built on trust of entities (can I trust this
404.
by baby 1y ago
It's not a consensus mechanism in the rigorous sense, it's more similar to a reliable broadcast protocol (less powerful)
405.
by baby 1y ago
Reth is basically a decentralized database, do you mean that they could have done without the EVM?
406.
by baby 1y ago
A cryptocurrency is basically a distributed database, except that you are getting different actors who don't necessarily trust one to run it cooperatively.
407.
by baby 1y ago
Your protocol has to use a consensus mechanism if you want to reliably make progress, and be able to recover if you make mistakes, this is exactly what a blockchain solves
408.
by baby 1y ago
I'll attempt an answer: Today, if you want to transact between businesses or retail (folks like you and I), you need to find a route between the two entities' banks. This route might take several hops, passing through some central
409.
by baby 1y ago
I think there are two issues, that maybe we should point out to help the debate: - As a user sometimes I want to sideload legitimate applications (the question now is why can't these apps get approved on the appstore?) - As a user some
410.
by baby 1y ago
BTW I remember not being excited by csszengarden and I knew one guy being excited about it. I'm still not excited tbh, I miss flash and photoshop heavy websites.
411.
by baby 1y ago
Who misses csszengarden
412.
by baby 1y ago
Not trying to be mean but I would expect comments on HN on these kind of stories to be from people who have used AI in IDEs at this point. There is no AI integration that runs automatically on a codebase.
413.
by baby 1y ago
From my experience using deepwiki what it generates is not deceptive garbage
414.
by baby 1y ago
They did it the right way for a very long time and yet people keep buying iPhones, I think I would do the same if I were them, users clearly don't seem to care about openness and freedom to use their devices however they want. I mean,
415.
by baby 1y ago
If the people who uber/taxi end up basically pooling in these vans then it's a win
416.
by baby 1y ago
With AI?
417.
by baby 1y ago
Wouldn't it make public transportation better? You could have mini vans basically acting like public taxis that would try to maximize capacity and minimize path traveled
418.
by baby 1y ago
I saw a waymo yesterday and was wondering what it was doing here!
419.
by baby 1y ago
Sum types is the one big thing missing IMO, the language got a LOT of things right otherwise
420.
by baby 1y ago
It doesnt let you change to chatgpt, thats my biggest issue with the Gemini integration.

More ›