baalimago

5 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by baalimago 4mo ago

   It most certainly will replace software engineers. What's missing is, as the article suggests, the "Delivery" bit. But that's not the realm of software engineers, that's the realm of DevOps/SRE/Cloud engin
2. 62.▲
   by baalimago 4mo ago

   This got me thinking about the "simulation theory": If our universe is simulated, it must be possible to snapshot the entire state for one iteration (however time now is quantized, open question). "... From here, it is a smal
3. 63.▲
   by baalimago 4mo ago

   I can't justify a pricetag like that when deepseek v4 pro is $0.003625/1M for cache hit, $0.435 for cache miss and $0.87 /1M tokens for output. For the token cost of explaining some task to Fable, deepseek v4 pro is able to s
4. 64.▲
   by baalimago 4mo ago

   I'm missing the concurrency model.
5. 65.▲
   by baalimago 4mo ago

   I don't understand why Google does this. If I can run this locally, why would I need a subscription or use any inference provider, including Google..? Scorched earth tactics to make anthropic and openai IPO fail?
6. 66.▲
   Show HN: Wd-41, hot-reload webserver for static sites(github.com)

   2 points by baalimago 4mo ago|0 comments
7. 67.▲
   by baalimago 5mo ago

   Perhaps best to simply declare indefinite-mortem
8. 68.▲
   by baalimago 5mo ago

   Great, so now chefs are being replaced too..!
9. 69.▲
   by baalimago 5mo ago

   Hey at least Copilot AI Model Providers have 100% uptime, so there's that
10. 70.▲
    by baalimago 5mo ago

    One day I wish to be in a stable enough place that it's possible for me to pursue activities like these. It's a true privilege
11. 71.▲
    by baalimago 5mo ago

    Good! Now please remove dependency of alphabet + apple for bank apps, and we're golden.
12. 72.▲
    by baalimago 5mo ago

    What happened to gemini 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4..?
13. 73.▲
    by baalimago 5mo ago

    Do we really need another one of these..?
14. 74.▲
    by baalimago 5mo ago

    Oh boy will this be dated in 2 years
15. 75.▲
    Clone Yourself into Agents(lorentz.app)

    1 points by baalimago 5mo ago|0 comments
16. 76.▲
    by baalimago 5mo ago

    Lack of extensive standard library, for one. But yeah Java is pretty great. Spring boot/quarkus especially
17. 77.▲
    by baalimago 5mo ago

    I read this, as my computer crashed while compiling a 1000 dependency CRUD rust app, for the fourth time today. Then I take a deep breath.
18. 78.▲
    by baalimago 5mo ago

    Captcha suggestion: force users to write something offensive/vulgar (we have a few "banned words"). Or to take a stance in Israel/Palestine. Whatever the response is, it'll unlikely be from an LLM.
19. 79.▲
    by baalimago 5mo ago

    Genius! Automate the flow for making customers spend money.
20. 80.▲
    by baalimago 5mo ago

    Yeah it's just a semantic pet peeve. Let me ask you this: What is a "Language Model", if this is a "Large Language Model"? Inversely, if a 1.5B model is "Large" then what is the recent 1T param models? &qu
21. 81.▲
    by baalimago 5mo ago

    Train your LM from scratch* I doubt you have a machine big enough to make it "Large".
22. 82.▲
    by baalimago 6mo ago

    My solution to this is to have leveled alerts. Some are... recommendations, the ones which you look at with a glance to get a heads up about something being wrong. These are the ones which OP would claim cause alert fatigue, most likely. Th
23. 83.▲
    by baalimago 6mo ago

    Conclusion from reading HN comments: very few used the calculator to actually calculate anything
24. 84.▲
    by baalimago 6mo ago

    Well, sort of. Imagine the case where it first scans the repo, then "intelligently" creates architecture files describing the project. The level of intelligence will create a varying quality of summary, with varying need of deep-s
25. 85.▲
    by baalimago 6mo ago

    Worth the 100% price increase over GPT-5.4?
26. 86.▲
    by baalimago 6mo ago

    "Benchmarks" aside, do anyone actually use these image models for anything?
27. 87.▲
    by baalimago 6mo ago

    Ah, my bad. I thought that was the source, but seems like the DB I found the high quality versions was elsewhere. Search for the "PIA number" of the images to find the high-res versions, example: https://www.nasa.gov&#x
28. 88.▲
    by baalimago 6mo ago

    If you're into this, check out the Apollo 11 gallery[1]. Contains very high-quality images from the actual trip, including "not so common" pictures from the moon. [1]: https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/apollo-
29. 89.▲
    by baalimago 6mo ago

    Sounds like a merge-conflict nightmare
30. 90.▲
    by baalimago 7mo ago

    You can tell it's an AI by it not becoming utterly by playing the "game". I could personally not stand any more than the first level.