Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
b112
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
451.
▲
by
b112
6mo ago
Hanging a comment here, not directly replying. Indeed. I see things like this: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jan/27/i... Where the current Iranian government is slaughtering its ow
452.
▲
by
b112
6mo ago
That's the starting point? That's what we document as acceptable? Better to document risk, than lie to brave volunteers. And they knew the risk, and wanted to go. So I see zero issues here.
453.
▲
by
b112
6mo ago
Clarity, I see I wrote tractor above once. Here lawn mowers are often called lawn tractors.
454.
▲
by
b112
6mo ago
It really depends on the size of the unit I think. When you get over 50", it seems to me you can really tell 480p vs 1080p, especially if you watch lots of 2160p content. If your TV is under 50", I don't think you'd not
455.
▲
by
b112
6mo ago
Having equity doesn't mean they can buy it, and regardless, that doesn't mean Visa/MC will work for free, or the banks/payment processors. Too many charge backs from an account, and that's the result. It's unc
456.
▲
by
b112
6mo ago
Tractor? The comment I am replying to was for a lawn mower.
457.
▲
by
b112
6mo ago
Yes, exactly.
458.
▲
by
b112
6mo ago
This is where small claims court can have a HUGE impact. Where I live, in small claims: * Lawyers are not allowed * There is no forced discovery. Sue John Deere, and they cannot ask for endless documents * There is no way to assign costs o
459.
▲
by
b112
6mo ago
There's a misunderstanding here. I'll make it clearer. The "Unless you're big cheese" is the company you're doing the charge back against. If a company, such as Anthropic has too many chargebacks? Visa/M
460.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
Unless you're big cheese, too many disputes can get a company cut off. Disputes aren't free to mediate, there's a cost to handle each one. Visa/MC can block a company, happens for lots of reasons.
461.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
They didn't ssy they did trust their claims.
462.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
And yet you have not even remotely addressed how this translates to every US government job being a morally / ethically bankrupt job . You wave your hands about, and cite far flung examples of how it could be, then there is not here
463.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
Nobody said Trump is literally Hitler. But literal Hitler did exist, so it all becomes a question of where do you personally draw the line?. For you, it seems to be somewhere between Trump and Hitler. For me, it's somewhere before Tru
464.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
Wild. This makes me even more interested in playing. Thanks
465.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
Giant indeed. How large was it, I couldn't even zoom in enough on my phone to get good detail.
466.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
> To paint every job which requires a clearance as morally bankrupt, to paint working for the government to be morally bankrupt, is frankly disgusting. Sometimes you don't know the exact nature of the task until after you've g
467.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
First, referencing "Nazi" has an age old tradition of immediately meaning you lose the debate. That's back to old Usenet and mailing list ethics. Regardless, absolutely, yes, I would take a job in Nazi Germany which required
468.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
It's contextual though, and pragmatic seems different to me than correct. For example, if you have $20 and a leaking roof, a $20 bucket of tar may be the pragmatic fix. Temporary but doable. Some might say it is not the correct way to
469.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
If you can't trust a company, don't use their api or cloud services. No amount of external output will ever validate anything, ever. You never know what's really happening, just because you see some text they sent you.
470.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
even if you lack sufficient scruples to be willing to pursue it in the first place. What an absurd thing to say. As a Canuck, I may even spend some days wondering if I'll have to defend my country from the US, but I can clearly see
471.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
This is what the internet used to be about, just people ... connecting with people, without all the hassle of big business in the way.
472.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
Yes, imagine being in breach of contract if you apply for a mortgage, and they ask "What do you do" and "How much do you make a year" and "Can we see a pay stub (or income tax info)". Such clauses are inane bey
473.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
If humans can prove that bespoke human code brings value, it'll stick around. Value to who, and which type of value? Will that defining value be purely economic in nature? While it be purely defined by mega-corps, and their percepti
474.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
It's literally in the bowl you were just sitting in. I'm not sure where the inspection plate goes. Is this an AI saying this? Is the rest of the thread AIs? Is this all made up. What's happening!? I thought learning abou
475.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
The first thing to go in every major war, will be the reliably of electronic anything. What's wrong with ID cards and cash?
476.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
While the example your provide is reasonable fair, the comparison is not. For it to be fair comparison, the carrots would have to be grown by a foreign company, known for using unsafe growing practices, causing contamination. Eg, poison ca
477.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
Worse, soon fewer and fewer people will taste good food, including even higher and higher scale restaurants just using pre-made. As fewer know what good food tastes like, the entire market will enshitify towards lower and lower calibre food
478.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
The burden of proof is predicated upon a well established economic terms. You want to refute those century+ old definitions? Alter them? Then yes, you have to start the dance. And work at it. And convince the entire planet to change.
479.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
Yes, that's why I specifically mentioned it. If the best data you have is conjoined, then you must either figure it out, or ignore it. Do you know what percentage, exactly, are retired vs "giving uo"? No? Then when someone sa
480.
▲
by
b112
7mo ago
Same issue in my country with employment rates. Yes, some of those have been looking for work for so long that they slide from looking to "not looking" automatically. However at the same time, some of those people actually don&
More ›