Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
azuanrb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
91.
▲
by
azuanrb
10mo ago
You're comparing a language with a framework. Better comparison would be Rust (with your choices of libraries) vs Ruby (with your choices of libraries). If you want to compare with Rails, you need to compare with battery included Rust
92.
▲
by
azuanrb
10mo ago
Available since few weeks ago. > Claude Opus 4.5, our frontier coding model, is now available in Claude Code for Pro users. Pro users can select Opus 4.5 using the /model command in their terminal. Opus 4.5 will consume rate limits
93.
▲
by
azuanrb
10mo ago
Per successful tasks. The result are mixed. Like you mentioned, it can be cheaper but only in some use cases. I'm only on the $20 plan. If I use Opus and it's not as efficient for my current tasks, I'll burn through my limit
94.
▲
by
azuanrb
10mo ago
I’m on the Lite plan. For coding, I still prefer Claude because the models are simply better. I mainly use CLI tools like Claude Code and OpenCode. I’m also managing a few projects and teams. One way I’m getting value from my GLM subscripti
95.
▲
by
azuanrb
10mo ago
I generally prefer Sonnet as comparison too. Opus, as good as it is, is just too expensive. The "best" model is the one I can use, not the one I can't afford. These days, by default I just use Sonnet/Haiku. In most cases
96.
▲
by
azuanrb
10mo ago
Part of it is because Ruby imo, have a very nice syntax. With type annotation, it's becoming "ugly", a lot more verbose. It's no longer English-like. I do agree type have some advantages, but we need to get the DX right.
97.
▲
by
azuanrb
10mo ago
I've been dealing with this in 2 ways: 1. Put bunch of bank statements pdf in a folder, give a deterministic output for each pdf. Then ask Claude Code to do whatever I want. Good enough. 2. My preferred approach is similar to above but
98.
▲
by
azuanrb
10mo ago
You still need ridiculously high spec hardware, and at Apple’s prices, that isn’t cheap. Even if you can afford it (most won't), the local models you can run are still limited and they still underperform. It’s much cheaper to pay for a
99.
▲
by
azuanrb
10mo ago
You can also use z.ai with Claude Code. My workflow: 1. Use Claude Code by default. 2. Use z.ai when I hit the limit Another advantage of z.ai is that you can also use the API, not just CLI. All in the same subscription. Pretty useful. I&#x
100.
▲
by
azuanrb
10mo ago
> mostly web developers who care about this in the first place. I’m not sure what you mean by this. We care about our users and how they use our websites. JavaScript is everywhere and has been the de facto frontend standard for the past
101.
▲
by
azuanrb
10mo ago
Which LSP are you using? I'm using both solargraph and ruby-lsp and both works fine by me (in neovim). Although those who really care about LSP support usually will use RubyMine IDE instead. Some of my colleagues are going that route,
102.
▲
by
azuanrb
10mo ago
Being open does not magically make everything better. People are willing to pay for Claude Code for many valid reasons. You are also assuming I have never used OpenCode, which is incorrect. Claude is simply my preference. I see all of these
103.
▲
by
azuanrb
10mo ago
How are you guys running it? Is it via RunsOn, Ubicloud? We just moved ours to Blacksmith since I still don't want to manage the worker ourselves yet. But with this change, we might be looking into cheaper, better alternatives if there
104.
▲
by
azuanrb
10mo ago
Not OP, but I feel the same way. Cost is just one of the factor. I'm used to Claude Code UX, my CLAUDE.md works well with my workflow too. Unless there's any significant improvement, changing to new models every few months is goin
105.
▲
by
azuanrb
10mo ago
I gave it a try a few months ago. Unfortunately, my experience was not that great. I was hosting it on Synology through Docker and found that the iOS client was a bit buggy and quite slow. Synology Photos completed the initial sync in a few
106.
▲
by
azuanrb
11mo ago
Tried it few days ago, and came to same conclusion myself. In a way, it's like Ansible but simpler for some use cases.
107.
▲
by
azuanrb
11mo ago
It varies from person to person because everyone uses search differently. Someone I know swears by it and loves it. I tried it for three months using only Kagi and it didn’t feel worth it to me, so I went back to Google. Your experience mig
108.
▲
by
azuanrb
11mo ago
I have Clara BW and Libra Color. Clara: - Small form factor. Super convenient to read and bring it anywhere. - No issue to read any materials imo. Libra: - It's slightly bigger and heavier. - I find it easier to read books with
109.
▲
by
azuanrb
1y ago
In my case, all photos are stored in Synology, then run nightly backup to Backblaze.
110.
▲
by
azuanrb
1y ago
I've migrated from Synology Photos. It's pretty seamless, since Immich now supports External Library. I use Docker Compose in Synology, so basically all I have to do is just mount existing Synology Photos folders to Immich. Works
111.
▲
by
azuanrb
1y ago
I run it locally all the time. Nothing catastrophic happened so far.
112.
▲
by
azuanrb
1y ago
Thanks, I’ll check out Perplexity. We seem to be using a similar stack. I’m also on Rails 8 with Stimulus, Hotwire, esbuild, and Tailwind. Playwright MCP has been a big help for frontend work. It gives the agent faster feedback when debuggi
113.
▲
by
azuanrb
1y ago
Have you tried context7 MCP? For things that are not mainstream (like Javascript, Typescript popularity), LLM might struggle. I usually have better result with using something like context7 where it can pull up more relevant, up to date exa
114.
▲
by
azuanrb
1y ago
Similar experience. Although, recently just tried Claude Code and it seems to be a pretty good upgrade (both Sonnet and Opus). I'd suggest you to give it a try if you haven't. For UI, Playwright MCP helps a lot. And since it can r
115.
▲
by
azuanrb
1y ago
Unfortunately that's the reality. I'm into Doctor Who but in Asia it's pretty much impossible to watch it through any legal means.
116.
▲
by
azuanrb
1y ago
Mainly because of the dynamically typed nature of the language. Not limited to Ruby/Rails. My colleagues used RubyMine because of this. I'm using Neovim with LSP, it's ok but nowhere near Go for example.
117.
▲
by
azuanrb
2y ago
For individual transactions, it's not really reliable, unfortunately. But for monthly reporting, they do have it, so that could be the next step. There's an app here that does something similar, but it doesn’t seem to be actively
118.
▲
by
azuanrb
2y ago
In my country (Malaysia), most banks only export bank and credit card statements as PDFs, with no standard format for displaying the data. Since most of my transactions are cashless, I want a way to track my spending habits. I don't wa
119.
▲
by
azuanrb
2y ago
You're correct. You need a server, so Vercel approach with serverless are not applicable here. As for the hosting, any VPS should be fine. I host mine on Digital Ocean. You can use Kamal to setup for database too. Or if it's simpl
120.
▲
by
azuanrb
2y ago
On Rails homepage, it says from “Hello World” to IPO. The idea is that Rails should help you maintain a lean stack by default. You can stick with Postgres for pretty much everything: caching, background jobs, search, WebSockets, you name it
More ›