azangru

6 ms·

61.
by azangru 7mo ago
> something that's pretty much standard and common practice Is it? How many people publish to their sites small texts that they then syndicate to Twitter/Bluesky/whatever? How many people publish videos to their sites and
62.
by azangru 7mo ago
If they blocked RT, they can block 4chan if they so choose. Why would they expect a company that does not target the British audience to have any concern for British laws?
63.
by azangru 7mo ago
7.24 seconds until html finished loading (could be due to a HN hug, but still) 4.0 MB transferred
64.
by azangru 7mo ago
The first random page it returned to me was this — https://gaultier.github.io/blog/how_to_make_your_own_static_... — which was about building one's own static site generator, which I really liked. I did not realis
65.
by azangru 7mo ago
"Do you wanna develop an app?" — Glootie
66.
by azangru 7mo ago
> Are people using react for non-SPA’s? Imagine a page that loads html during the first load, and then performs client-side routing during subsequent navigations. Is it an SPA? Is it not an SPA?
67.
by azangru 7mo ago
Probably wasn't supposed to either :-)
68.
by azangru 7mo ago
> TypeScript also was specifically designed so engine could strip types and execute result code. These build tools should not exist in the first place. Was it? Have you forgotten namespaces and enums?
69.
by azangru 7mo ago
Could you give examples of the modern frameworks that you have in mind?
70.
by azangru 7mo ago
Why would you need LibreOffice to write in Markdown? That would be, like, one of the slowest Markdown editors out there.
71.
by azangru 7mo ago
> Why is this an international movement? Suddenly, simultaneously, all over the Western world? Sometimes kids hurt themselves through the use of the internet. And their parents lash out to blame someone [0]. And mainstream media pick up
72.
by azangru 7mo ago
> First impression is that's really his writing. He's a professional writer. Thing is it's like trying to be a professional writer. I am not suggesting that this isn't his writing. What I was wondering was whether the
73.
by azangru 7mo ago
Is it a style like his that LLMs have been copying lately? "It was cold out, but none of us were cold." "In that moment, there was nothing to do. Nothing to improve. Nothing to fix. It was perfect." "We’ve all seen
74.
by azangru 7mo ago
> it is a lot nicer and I am honestly wondering if Scrum is even necessary when you're only with 4-5 devs. Scrum is so woefully misunderstood. It makes sense for small teams (yes, those 4-5 devs), if — and that's a big if — the
75.
by azangru 7mo ago
> So I built a real website. That was two weeks ago. Is Google supposed to have drastic updates to its index over 2 weeks?
76.
by azangru 8mo ago
> You might say well, it's on the Cloudflare blog so it must have some merit I would instead say that it is written by James Snell, who is one of the central figures in the Node community; and therefore it must have some merit.
77.
by azangru 8mo ago
What was it specifically about the style that stood out as incongruous, or that hindered comprehension? What was it that made you stumble and start paying close attention to the style rather than to the message? I am looking at the two exam
78.
by azangru 8mo ago
Never heard of them either. But the link in the title is to Jack Dorsey's tweet. Now him I have heard of. Didn't know he was involved in that company too.
79.
by azangru 8mo ago
Here's what opening that site without an ad blocker feels like: https://images2.imgbox.com/cc/f9/gX6o2Jfu_o.png Must be very conducive to reading
80.
by azangru 8mo ago
> but grammar privilege? That's certainly a first. Here is what I don't understand, and what is not addressed in the post. After you get a response from your boss that reads, "K let circle back nxt week bout it . thnks&quo
81.
by azangru 8mo ago
> RXJS is also 18 MB This is impossible. I think you are off by about a factor of 1000.
82.
by azangru 8mo ago
RxJS has an intrinsic diamond problem (multiple events fired when several sources update simultaneously), which led to occasional glitches. Signals are guaranteed not to have that problem. This is a strong argument in their favor. But yeah;
83.
by azangru 8mo ago
> Letting google implement a new language for the web would probably result in something even worse than javascript. Why? Javascript was famously written in ten days, was intended for casual scripting, and has not made up its mind whethe
84.
by azangru 8mo ago
> It (and also React) gets worse if you add a state system like RxJS. I don't understand this sentiment. Client-side applications often have a need for global state. It could be as simple as whether the user is logged in, or as comp
85.
by azangru 8mo ago
I think digressions about React dilute the message. Ok, we get it, react bad; but what is the actionable message here? What are the robust alternatives? There is a section on how changes to react (the introduction of hooks and of the concur
86.
by azangru 8mo ago
> The separation is already there I wonder how you would map these three onto M, V, and C :-)
87.
by azangru 8mo ago
> And the new framework is so niche it's now hard to hire for it. Why do you need to specifically "hire for a framework"? Wouldn't any front-end developer be able to pick up any front-end framework (unless it's o
88.
by azangru 8mo ago
I think the parent wants to separate the V from the M/C. If you smuggle signals inside of components to avoid prop drilling, you would be coupling the M/C and the V. I suppose that's not what the parent has in mind.
89.
by azangru 8mo ago
If you move the data (the M and the C) entirely out of react, and only pass it in via props, there would be only one place — the root react node — where the props could get into react. Is this what you have in mind? Or are you envisioning m
90.
by azangru 8mo ago
> The browser ... wasn’t architected to run applications. Could you explain this? What prevents the browser from running applications? How should it have been architected otherwise if running applications was the goal?

More ›