aydyn

40 ms·

721.
by aydyn 4y ago
Reputable sources say that "California will burn down" and "NYC will be under water"? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Unless OP is just using hyperbole to make a point, in which case maybe they shouldn&
722.
by aydyn 4y ago
Those are just buzzwords thrown in to make their article sound more impactful and progressive. Every author does this (yes, literally every author). Who cares. What about their tech?
723.
by aydyn 4y ago
This is extremely tame shit, and I'm offended that wikipedians think that this is remotely close to being a decent list of true creepy pasta.
724.
by aydyn 4y ago
That's fine, my mistake. You should charitably interpret it as "your response doesn't align with the GP comment."
725.
by aydyn 4y ago
I think your criticism demonstrates a willingness to only criticize one side of an argument, the one you happen to disagree with. You ask for a charitable interpretation of OP, but don't give a charitable interpretation of the response
726.
by aydyn 4y ago
Intent and beliefs are not the same thing.
727.
by aydyn 4y ago
Nonsense. That is what they were saying.
728.
by aydyn 4y ago
> In other western democracies, freedom of speech isn't paramount. What you say matters and you can be held responsible for it and the harm you cause. I understand, but that's not what you said in GP.
729.
by aydyn 4y ago
> Whether or not an arrest is warranted is another debate, but the it's important to highlight the context of the group who made the image to understand their motivations behind creating the image, and what it implies about people w
730.
by aydyn 4y ago
Or did a huge amount of work on a project, didn't get properly credited or worse, had their credit stolen by some other employee. When there's little correlation between amount of effort and advancement as is very often the case,
731.
by aydyn 4y ago
Whether their findings are novel or not, it is clearly laden with technobabble. It seems you are the one less familiar with academic writing?
732.
by aydyn 4y ago
Mice are physiologically small humans with tails and fur. Findings in mice are very relevant to humans.
733.
by aydyn 4y ago
polygenic risk scores are composed of massive number of loci, so direct gene editing (ala crispr) is not feasible.