Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aydyn
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
36 ms
·
541.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
I'm not disputing that. What does that have to do with whether a human brain is inherently intelligent?
542.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
I literally just followed suit. Don't like the response, don't lead. You're being hypocritical.
543.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
> I also think these sort of behaviors are damaging their brand, which is certainly Apple's most valuable asset - which is to say that I think they're acting in an irrational way, because of the amount of money at stake. I thin
544.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
This is sophomoric. First of all, muscle memory is not contained in your muscles or "distributed" throughout your body but is known to reside in your cerebellum and basal ganglia. The nerves going down to your muscles are simply a
545.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
So a brain is only "intelligent" in certain (but infinite) contexts as opposed to intelligence as an inherent property of a brain? If so, your definition of "intelligence" is incomplete. What are those contexts? Can you
546.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
{{fart noises}}
547.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
Philosophy aside, the point is there's no mechanism to distinguish grifters from non-grifters in academia. The proposal "staking professional reputation" requires reputation to be an accurate measurement of competency.
548.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
A brain is intelligent regardless of where it is, so long as it's "powered" so to speak.
549.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
What you're saying makes the issue sound even worse. > It's not a perfect system, but it works reasonably well as long as most of the reputable experts deserve their reputation. I don't understand why you'd think this
550.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
There's a subtle circularity problem with your proposal in that "professional reputations" are largely based on those same scientific metrics, which we know are gamed. The ability of even other scientists outside a field to p
551.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
You're good, sorry dropped the /s
552.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
To mine crypto ofc. Why do you think?
553.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
You did not address it nor did you correct your incorrect claim.
554.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
The point is your claim is wrong by the text you yourself linked to . The data, assuming we just go by what you linked, IS decisive. It shows you are wrong.
555.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
Interesting that you address a completely different point and (poster!) in response to what was written by me. Regardless of what GP wrote, you made a claim as well.
556.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
9/10 Some of you really need to up your game. I do think discerning AI from real photo will be an important skill in the upcoming years. A lot of the artifacts should be obvious (Spoilers below) ########### 1. Glasses completely and ut
557.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
> Evidence that board diversity benefits firms, however, has been mixed. A 2015 meta-analysis of 140 research studies of the relationship between female board representation and performance found a positive relationship with accounting r
558.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
There are solar powered christmas lights. That seems more much more practical.
559.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
its absurd because its not going to happen. Its magical thinking to expect the general population to live past their daily life and understand these issues.
560.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
But self driving has improved. Maybe not as fast as people would like but its clearly better than it was 5 years ago.
561.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
How about a million k.
562.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
like for what like? give an example.
563.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
Model 3 was 30K for the longest time after tax credits and Model Y not too much more. Citing a price of 50K is a massive strawman.
564.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
Then dont buy a 50-60K EV? buy one thats 30K or less?
565.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
clicks and clout chasing
566.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
There are lots of datasets where applying multiclass LR makes sense. Image classification isn't it.
567.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
It does "work like that", this is literally my field. Evolution is a random walk where organisms higher up on a fitness landscape are more likely to survive. Over time, the probability of climbing the fitness landscape approaches
568.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
You missed the point. What's the barrier to stop simple organisms from developing into more complex and eventually intelligent systems? There's no delineation between "intelligent" and "simple" life. It's
569.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
> To me, that doesn’t equate to corporate scam. To me, it is misguided at worst. Sure, then discuss that to start with? Don't tone police GPs thoughts. > We may disagree, but that doesn’t mean I am trolling you. I don’t assume yo
570.
▲
by
aydyn
3y ago
From a cellular perspective, human cells are not really more complex than smaller multi-cellular organisms like amoebas. Give the huge advantage that intelligence has for natural selection in complex environments, why would intelligent life
More ›