aydyn

30 ms·

421.
by aydyn 2y ago
Are you serious? The entire nation was fully captivated this election cycle.
422.
by aydyn 2y ago
This exchange is like a microcosm of the educated elite trying to talk to ordinary people.
423.
by aydyn 2y ago
> Ironically, the Democrats had a much more comprehensive policy position of course. Given all the buzz around Project 2025, thats certainly not perceptually true _even to democrats_. If Trump really had less comprehensive policy positio
424.
by aydyn 2y ago
It wasnt just Harris but the entire media and entire democratic establishment fabricating claims of Trump doom. The best thing Kamala could have done is to downplay that rhetoric and focus on issues. If she did that, I believe she wouldve w
425.
by aydyn 2y ago
Given that this is a repeat of 2016, it wont wear off and they wont be ashamed. Yeah the crowd that touts itself as highly intelligent and techno-savvy apparently cant learn simple lessons.
426.
by aydyn 2y ago
You could try better arguments?
427.
by aydyn 2y ago
seems like liberals collectively forgot about it
428.
by aydyn 2y ago
Not you all, you specifically. And for your rhetoric too.
429.
by aydyn 2y ago
There are certainly vocal and well spoken conservatives here, but by and large this site skews massively liberal. I mean just read this threads comments, ffs.
430.
by aydyn 2y ago
I meant that the pandemic was something that did change things and wasnt "more or less the same". But that has little to do with Trump.
431.
by aydyn 2y ago
GP is indistinguishable from a bot. Treat him that way.
432.
by aydyn 2y ago
Also don't blatantly exaggerate and lie in journalism: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/01/politics/donald-trump-liz-che...
433.
by aydyn 2y ago
No, you downvoted immediately and you responded to other posts so your excuse of not watching HN is simply an untruth. Your posts here tend to be vacuous, so your response was expected.
434.
by aydyn 2y ago
No response, thought so.
435.
by aydyn 2y ago
What is your effective solution then?
436.
by aydyn 2y ago
Sounds promising but still needs to be independently validated. Its always wise to take AI medical research with a grain of salt.
437.
by aydyn 2y ago
can you give a brief example? Very intrigued.
438.
by aydyn 2y ago
neither is yours but okay
439.
by aydyn 2y ago
sir, its a browser
440.
by aydyn 2y ago
cool I also like to send msft extra telemetry /s
441.
by aydyn 2y ago
Okay but counterpoint: it doesnt actually make any difference whatsoever. The fact that you dont make an actual argument proves it.
442.
by aydyn 2y ago
Sorry, but I mean objectively it is not. Its a gimmick, not a UI defining feature. You are using the exact same tools I am: chromium. Chromium but with more invasion of privacy.
443.
by aydyn 2y ago
None of those things are anything close to killer features much less reasons to switch. Verticle tabs, seriously?
444.
by aydyn 2y ago
They are talking about the user experience. Charging from a Tesla supercharger is completely frictionless. From a non-Tesla charger... have you ever tried it?
445.
by aydyn 2y ago
Are you serious? Doctors are often on call 24/7 and do significantly more work than the average C-suite, yet you're complaining about a two hour work day? The lack of self awareness is astounding.
446.
by aydyn 2y ago
> Mathlib defines cos x = (exp(ix)+exp(-ix))/2 I am not understanding why you think this is at all relevant. Its like saying a^2 + b^2 = c^2 is not geometric because it doesnt make reference to triangles. But at the end of the day,
447.
by aydyn 2y ago
> Lean's mathlib defines pi precisely the way I've described it - cos is defined via exp, and pi is defined as the unique zero in [0,2] Which, _again_ is a taylor series. A function having a taylor series does not argue against
448.
by aydyn 2y ago
Any function can be defined as a taylor series. That is not at all an argument against its geometric nature.
449.
by aydyn 2y ago
What do you mean? Cos is an inherently geometric function.
450.
by aydyn 2y ago
Youre right, you should be sorry. Dont be that guy.

More ›